The purpose of this assignment is to analyze how an organization’s quality and improvement processes contribute to its risk management program.

This assignment builds on the Risk Management Program Analysis – Part One assignment you completed in Topic 1 of this course.

Assume that the sample risk management program you analyzed in Topic 1 was implemented and is now currently in use by your health care employer/organization. Further assume that your supervisor has asked you to create a high‐level summary brief of this new risk management program to share with a group of administrative personnel from a newly created community health organization in your state who has enlisted your organization’s assistance in developing their own risk management policies and procedures.

Compose a 1,250‐1,500 word summary brief that expands upon the elements you first addressed in the Topic 1 assignment. In this summary brief, address the following points regarding your health care organization and its risk management program:

1. Explain the role of your organization’s MIPPA-approved accreditation body (e.g., JC, ACR, IAC) in the evaluation of your institution’s quality improvement and risk management processes.
2. Describe the roles that different levels of administrative personnel play in healthcare ethics and establishing or sustaining employer/employee-focused organizational risk management strategies and operational policies.
3. Illustrate how your organization’s risk management and compliance programs support ethical standards, patient consent, and patient rights and responsibilities.
4. Explain the legal and ethical responsibilities health care professionals face in upholding risk management policies and administering safe health care at your organization.
5. Relate how your organization’s quality improvement processes support and contribute to its overall journey to excellence.

In addition to your textbook, you are required to support your analysis with a minimum of three peer‐reviewed references.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

BS Health Sciences

3.3 Explain the ethical and legal responsibilities of health care professionals related to risk management assessment and policies.

Assignment is very simple. Doesn’t have to be a full page of information on each page just 5-7 bullet points on each page. Below I attached an example of a student who did their assignment on headaches that you can use to help you out.

For this project, you will complete a clinical case study analysis, research review, and PowerPoint video presentation about the pathophysiology of Chronic Pain OR Cancer-Related Pain OR Neuropathic Pain. (choose any of the three)

1. Your presentation should follow a case study SBAR format (situation, background, assessment, and recommendations).
2. You must include three (3) different medical-based evidence and/or research recommendations.
3. You must include at least three (3) scholarly sources in your overall presentation.

Your PowerPoint presentation should include the following slides:

• Introduction to the case or situation
• Background detail
• Clinical assessment
• Recommendations
• Application to future practice
• Reference slide: At least three (3) scholarly references supporting your ideas.

Week 4 Discussion: How Do the Top Dogs Do It? Learning from Example Toward Effective Drafting

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

• Textbook: pp. 469-494.
• Lesson
• Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)

Apply the following writing resources to your posts:

• Link (website): APA Citation and Writing  (Links to an external site.)

Initial Post Instructions

Main Post Paragraph 1: Evaluate an argumentative point
Choose a reading from the assigned pages in your textbook and note how the author addresses an argumentative point in the body of the article (in other words, not in the introduction paragraph(s) nor in the conclusion paragraph(s). Work to find a body point that demonstrates a range of strategies like logic, refutation, and author’s voice.

Then, please take the time to read and re-read the entire piece and your chosen section a few times, jotting down notes to help you, before composing a paragraph that addresses all of the following:

• In what ways do you see the author’s voice being used? How does the author’s own voice (not the sources’ voices) drive and frame the argument?
• What does the author use for support for the point? (for example, logic created by the author, sources, a combination?) Is this effective, in your view? Why or why not?
• Does the author use any logical fallacies? If so, name them and explain why they are fallacies. If not, explain why the author’s logic is solid.
• Does the form of this reading match the form of the writing we are learning: full essay paragraphs? If so, explain why and how. If not, explain why you think this particular piece of reading does not use academic essay format and what you might do to revise it. In other words, if there are many short paragraphs, could you put some together to form single paragraphs that are still driven by the author’s voice?

Main Post Paragraph 2: Practice Using Your Voice in a Full Body Paragraph Toward Your Essay
Referring back to the lesson, please compose and present a single, well-developed draft of one body paragraph for our argument research essay, paying special attention to making your voice the driving force and to using solid logic. Remember the parts of a good body paragraph for an argument essay:

• Composing a smooth, clear topic sentence in your voice that provides a transition and that asserts your topic for the paragraph
• Using your voice to introduce and present your evidence that supports your topic sentence
• Using logic in your voice to tie the evidence to your argumentative point
• Avoiding logical fallacies
• Using concession and rebuttal if you are presenting opposing viewpoints
• Ending strongly with your voice in an extended explanation of how all factors involved in this paragraph drive home your argument in this particular point
• Making sure to synthesize throughout, with clear connections between all evidence and all of your logic and assertions

Writing Requirements

• Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside scholarly source)
• APA format for in-text citations and list of references

Grading

Similarity is very important no more than 10%

Students will continue their research topic, in this paper students will perform a brief literature review on the topic (Will need at least 5 support articles) and provide the desired methodology for the project. Paper will be approximately 5-6 pages. 

Research phase 1 attached 

1. Brief literature review

2. Methodology and design of the study (Be detailed )

3. Sampling methodology

4. Necessary tools

5.   Any algorithms or flow maps created.

1. You will perform a history of a peripheral vascular problem that your instructor has provided you or one that you have experienced and perform a peripheral vascular assessment. You will document your subjective and objective findings, identify actual or potential risks, and submit this in a Word document to the drop box provided.

   Peripheral Vascular System Assignment

   PLEASE USE THE TEMPLATE!!!