The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities.

This assignment consists of both an interview and a PowerPoint (PPT) presentation.

Assessment/Interview

Select a community of interest in your region. Perform a physical assessment of the community.

1. Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide.”
2. Interview a community health and public health provider regarding that person’s role and experiences within the community.

Interview Guidelines

Interviews can take place in-person, by phone, or by Skype.

Develop interview questions to gather information about the role of the provider in the community and the health issues faced by the chosen community.

Complete the “Provider Interview Acknowledgement Form” prior to conducting the interview. Submit this document separately in its respective drop box.

Compile key findings from the interview, including the interview questions used, and submit these with the presentation.

 describing the chosen community interest.

Include the following in your presentation:

1. Description of community and community boundaries: the people and the geographic, geopolitical, financial, educational level; ethnic and phenomenological features of the community, as well as types of social interactions; common goals and interests; and barriers, and challenges, including any identified social determinates of health.
2. Summary of community assessment: (a) funding sources and (b) partnerships.
3. Summary of interview with community health/public health provider.
4. Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion.
5. A conclusion summarizing your key findings and a discussion of your impressions of the general health of the community.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA format ting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

 

Assignment Content

1. Review your leadership structure, and identify the process by which you can propose a policy change and how that proposal would navigate through leadership to get approved.

   Identify a policy in your organization that you think could be created or amended to improve organizational governance, operations, or compliance with federal or state regulations.

   Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper that outlines your policy proposal ideas in which you do all of the following:

   • Provide an analysis of how your policy change would improve the organization.
   • Evaluate what changes in the organization would need to be made to implement the policy change.
   • Explain how you would advocate for your policy change while using the approval processes in your organization.
   • Cite 3 reputable references to support your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality).

     Format your assignment according to APA guidelines. 

      https://s3.amazonaws.com/blackboard.learn.xythos.prod/300502SF160441/19882034?response-cache-control=private%2C%20max-age%3D21600&response-content-disposition=attachment%3B%20filename%3D%22APA.UOPX.SamplePaper.UndergradandMasters.pdf%22%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27APA.UOPX.SamplePaper.UndergradandMasters.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20200928T120000Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAYDKQORRYTKBSBE4S%2F20200928%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=d1fbe4f65b2e07357abc5ea3b1f4ea47ac33aacfc6bd877063dfc16d13809126

Research and write a report on : diabetes

The body of your paper must be 2-3 pages in length (not including reference list).  Your report should contain:

1. A thorough description and background of the topic – causes, disease risks, treatments, etc.
2. A detailed explanation of nutrition and dietary recommendations for individuals concerned about the topic.
3. Minimum of 2 references required (but no more than 5).

APA style reference

 

Assignment

Part 1: Comprehensive Client Family Assessment

Use Major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder or any other mood disorder

Create a comprehensive client assessment for your selected client family that addresses (without violating HIPAA regulations) the following:

• Demographic information
• Presenting problem
• History or present illness
• Past psychiatric history
• Medical history
• Substance use history
• Developmental history
• Family psychiatric history
• Psychosocial history
• History of abuse and/or trauma
• Review of systems
• Physical assessment
• Mental status exam
• Differential diagnosis
• Case formulation
• Treatment plan

Part 2: Family Genogram

Develop a genogram for the client family you selected. The genogram should extend back at least three generations (parents, grandparents, and great grandparents).

Rubric:

 

Quality of Work Submitted:

The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.–

Excellent (90-100) 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)Good (80-89) 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Fair (70-79) 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.–

Excellent (90-100) 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Good (80-89) 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Fair (70-79) 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.–

Excellent (90-100) 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Good (80-89) 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Fair (70-79) 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.–

Excellent (90-100) 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Good (80-89) 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Fair (70-79) 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.–

Excellent (90-100) 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)Good (80-89) 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Fair (70-79) 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–

Excellent (90-100) 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Good (80-89) 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Fair (70-79) 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 5 (5%)

Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–

Excellent (90-100) 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Good (80-89) 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Fair (70-79) 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Poor (0-69) 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)