In order to formulate your evidence-based practice (EBP), – 2025 In order to formulate your evidence based practice EBP you need to assess your organization In this assignment you will

by

Nursing Assignment Help

In order to formulate your evidence-based practice (EBP), – 2025

 

In order to formulate your evidence-based practice (EBP), you need to assess your organization. In this assignment, you will be responsible for setting the stage for EBP. This assignment is conducted in two parts: an organizational cultural and readiness assessment and the proposal/problem statement and literature review, which you completed in NUR-550.

Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment

It is essential to understand the culture of the organization in order to begin assessing its readiness for EBP implementation. Select an appropriate organizational culture survey tool and use this instrument to assess the organization’s readiness.

  1. Develop an analysis of 250 words from the results of the survey, addressing your organization’s readiness level, possible project barriers and facilitators, and how to integrate clinical inquiry, providing strategies that strengthen the organization’s weaker areas.
  2. Make sure to include the rationale for the survey category scores that were significantly high and low, incorporating details or examples. Explain how to integrate clinical inquiry into the organization.
  3. Submit a summary of your results. The actual survey results do not need to be included.

Section B: Proposal/Problem Statement and Literature Review

In NUR-550, you developed a PICOT statement and literature review for a population quality initiative. In 500-750 words, include the following:

  1. Refine your PICOT into a proposal or problem statement.
  2. Provide a summary of the research you conducted to support your PICOT, including subjects, methods, key findings, and limitations.

 

P: The lower SES population diagnosed with diabetes type 2.

I: Analysis of the current SES barrier health disparities impedes the provision of quality health care facilities.

C: Promoting equality in the provision of health care procedures to patients with diabetes from the lower SES population.

O: Deliver improved quality of healthcare to the lower SES population to attain the healthy people goal 2020.

This research shows health disparities and determinants regarding those individuals who have diabetes. This PICO is modifiable and open to exploring.

 My PICO was based on the Socioeconomic Status (SES) and geographical location. the disparities in the health care system, with a specific focus on SES and how it affects the access and availability of quality care. In general, the SES can be classified by one’s education, earnings, and occupation. They live in rural and undeveloped regions where there is a lack of medical support, education, and job. Health disparities place a tremendous strain on the community of health care and on culture. Evidence shows that lower SES is associated with the increased health disparities in diabetes patients among U.S. populations. In addition, the collection of data and information among high-risk diabetes groups is appropriate to tackle the health problem in the United States. I provided an intervention that utilized appropriate financing and donation programs would encourage health interventions from distinct ethnic and racial groups to treat diagnosed patients. People have different beliefs and attitudes about individuals with diabetes. Diabetes incidence is different among the various ethnic groups. Appropriate projects need to be developed to eliminate lower SES health disparities.(Healthy People 2020, 2018) 

General Guidelines:

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Note: After submitting the assignment, you will receive feedback from the instructor. Use this feedback to make revisions for your final paper submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Comparison Paper Theories- Dorothy Johnson: Behavioral Systems Model and Virginia Henderson: Definition of Nursing (Due 24 hours) – 2025 1 Minimum 8 full pages Follow the 3 x 3 rule minimum

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Comparison Paper Theories- Dorothy Johnson: Behavioral Systems Model and Virginia Henderson: Definition of Nursing (Due 24 hours) – 2025

 

1) Minimum 8  full pages (Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum three paragraphs per page)

              

2)¨******APA norms, please use headers

          All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraphs

          Bulleted responses are not accepted

          Dont write in the first person 

          Dont copy and pase the questions.

          Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph

3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks) 

********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)

4) Minimum 5 references per part not older than 5 years

5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question.

Example:

Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX

Q 2. Health is XXXX

__________________________________________________________________________________

 Dorothy Johnson: Behavioral Systems Model and Virginia Henderson: Definition of Nursing 

1. An introduction, including an overview of both selected nursing theories

2. Background of the theories

3. Philosophical underpinnings of the theories

4. Major assumptions, concepts, and relationships

5. Clinical applications/usefulness/value to extending nursing science testability

6. Comparison of the use of both theories in nursing practice

7. Specific examples of how both theories could be applied in your specific clinical setting

8. Parsimony

9. Conclusion/summary

Maternity Nursing – 2025 1 A 35 year old G1P0 is 20 weeks gestation with a past medical

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Maternity Nursing – 2025

 

#1  A 35 year old G1P0 is 20 weeks gestation with a past medical history of hypertension.  Her pregnancy has been uneventful; however, at today’s appointment, her blood pressure was 150/100mmHg at first check and 15 minutes later was still 136/90 mmHg.  She is also complaining of light-headedness and palpitations.

     A.  What actions would you take as her nurse?

     B.  What change should this patient be encouraged to do?

     C.  What are the expected outcomes?

#2.  The patient is a 17 year old female who arrives to the emergency department in active labor with a questionable past of obstetrical history.  She indicates that she has had no prenatal care, does not remember her last menstruation period, and is evasive if this is her first pregnancy.  Blood work indicates she is Rh negative.

     A.  What are some concerns you as her nurse should be prepared for?

     B.  What teaching does this patient need?

     C.  What are the expected outcomes for this patient?

#3  A 15 year-old female has come to the urgent care complaining about nausea, vomiting, and feeling tired all the time.  Her complaints are vague, but the nurse is suspicious she may be pregnant when the girl mentions she is late for her period.

     A.  What nursing care will you provide to this young lady if she is pregnant.

     B.   What nursing diagnoses will apply to this situation?

     C.  What are some expected outcomes?

#4 A woman in labor has been progressing well with minimal difficulties.  The nullipara woman has been working with her coach, progressing through the process.  The fetal monitor has indicated that the fetus is in stable condition.  Suddenly, the monitor alarm goes off and exam reveals a possible prolapsed cord.

     A.  What steps should you take as her nurse?

     B.  What care does the mother and infant need?

     C. How would you evaluate that your interventions were helpful?

#5  Your patient is a petite 23-year-old G1P0 woman.  Prenatal assessment has determined that this woman will need a cesarean birth due to cephalopelvic disproportion.

     A.  What can this patient and you as the nurse do prenatally to ensure a safe delivery?

     B.  What potential risks and/or complications should the nurse be aware of and prepare for?

     C.  What postoperative care will this mother and/or infant need?

Week 7 Course Project: Argumentative Paper – 2025 Week 7 Course Project Argumentative Paper Submit Assignment Due Dec 13 by 11 59pm Points 185 Submitting a file upload

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Week 7 Course Project: Argumentative Paper – 2025

Week 7 Course Project: Argumentative Paper

Submit Assignment

  • Due Dec 13 by 11:59pm
  • Points 185
  • Submitting a file upload

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 15
  • Lesson
  • Completed Week 5 Source Evaluation Worksheet (included annotated bibliography)
  • Minimum of 5 scholarly sources

Introduction
This week, all the hard work you have done in researching your topic and issue will come to fruition in your argumentative paper. Once you feel you have got the final draft, try to put the paper aside, even for a few hours, and then read it again.

  • Did you address at least three aspects of the issue you chose?
  • Does each aspect have relevant and authoritative evidence in support of your point?
  • Have you included a view that is in opposition to your viewpoint, and have you answered that opposing view, pointing out its flaws in such a way as to refute it?

Edit your paper – look for wordiness, repetition, vagueness, ambiguities. Check the organization of the paper as a whole; make sure each paragraph maintains focus. After you are satisfied that the content of your paper is good, carefully proofread it and correct mechanical errors.

Here is a brief breakdown of the project so that you can plan your time in the course:

Week

Task

Week 1

Topic Selection

Week 3

Issue Review (both sides)

Week 5

Thesis & Annotated Bibliography (both sides)

Week 7

Argumentative Paper

Instructions
This week, you will complete your argumentative paper. Following the directions in assigned textbook reading on how write an argumentative essay on the issue you chose in Week 1. Be sure your essay contains the following:

  • An opening paragraph that states a clear thesis that is focused, plausible, and arguable and that gives direction and purpose to the paper
  • A fair-minded, balanced, and objective development of the pros and cons of the issue in a well-organized sequence of ideas, free of mechanical errors
  • Credible, reliable, and authoritative evidence in support of the points made
  • A strong conclusion that summarizes your views, reminds the audience of the issue and its importance, and shows in brief that you have successfully defended your thesis

Note

As you do your research, it is permissible to change your sources. Also, because of the recency and relevance of these issues, no sources older than 5 years should be used other than as historical information. Critical thinkers do the research first and then side with the preponderance of evidence. You might want to follow that principle.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 4-6 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page

Grading
This activity will be graded using the W7 Course Project Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

W7 Course Project Grading Rubric – 185 ptsW7 Course Project Grading Rubric – 185 ptsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength5.0 ptsMeets length requirement0.0 ptsDoes not meet length requirement5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose & Focus10.0 ptsThe writer has made insightful and mature decisions about focus, organization, and content to communicate clearly and effectively. The purpose and focus of the writing are clear to the reader and the organization and content are well chosen, sophisticated, and/or persuasive. Has a highly developed, defendable thesis that provides focus and direction to the essay.8.5 ptsThe writer has made good decisions about focus, organization, and content to communicate clearly and effectively. The purpose and focus of the writing are clear to the reader and the organization and content achieve the purpose as well. Has a clear recognizable thesis that provides focus and direction to the essay.7.5 ptsThe writer’s decisions about focus, organization, or content sometimes interfere with clear, effective communication. The purpose of the writing is not fully achieved. Thesis is unclear OR is not focused6.0 ptsThe writer’s decisions about focus, organization, or content interfere with communication. The purpose of the writing is not achieved. Lacks a clear thesis0.0 ptsCompletely unfocused and/or disorganized. Purpose of writing is not achieved. No recognizable thesis10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Research/Evidence40.0 ptsSources are scholarly or of very high substantive quality where subject matter requires and no scholarly reference will serve the purpose, but all are current, authoritative, and relevant to topic.34.0 ptsMost sources are scholarly or of very high substantive quality where subject matter requires; but all are current, authoritative and relevant to topic.30.0 ptsSources are mostly substantive, even where subject matter does not require. All are relevant to the topic. One source outside of current range.24.0 ptsSources are substantive, even though scholarly sources are available and relevaant. Only one scholarly source. All are relevant to the topic. More than one source outside of current range.0.0 ptsPopular sources only and are not, therefore, authoritative, OR sources are not current, OR sources are not relevant40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasoning45.0 ptsSubstantial and well-reasoned development of ideas. All key assumptions are made explicit. Credible evidence is germane, and accurately analyzed and fair- mindedly interpreted. Displays strong critical thinking skills and habits of mind.38.25 ptsOffers solid reasoning. Most key assumptions are recognized or made explicit. Most inferences are accurate, most examples are on point.33.75 ptsOffers some supporting evidence. The case includes some examples that are too general, not interpreted, or not clearly relevant to thesis.27.0 ptsOffers simplistic, underdeveloped, circular, or irrelevant arguments.0.0 ptsIncludes fallacies, exaggerations, faulty reasoning, factual errors, biased statements, etc.45.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization30.0 ptsSequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs flow smoothly and coherently throughout the paper. The writer shows clear effort to assist the reader in following the logic of the ideas expressed. Develops a complete reasoning pathway that contains logical follow through, considers multiple points of view,and examines assumptions.25.5 ptsSequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs make the writer’s points coherent and easy to follow. Develops a logical reasoning pathway with minor gaps or leaps while addressing other points of view.22.5 ptsSentence structure and/ or word choice sometimes interfere with clarity and coherence. Needs to improve sequencing of ideas within paragraphs and transitions between paragraphs to make the writing easy to follow May contain some gaps in reasoning pathway; deals minimally with other points of view.18.0 ptsIneffective sentence structure, word choice, transitions, and/ or sequencing of ideas make reading and understanding difficult. Contains gaps and/or leaps in development and does not examine other points of view.0.0 ptsDisorganized; little or no sequencing of ideas; awkward and ineffective sentence structure; reading and understanding extremely difficult Undeveloped and/or does not examine other points of view.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Tone20.0 ptsMaintains objective and professional tone; uses professional vocabulary. The use of words, sentences, and punctuation creates a distinct and engaging voice, tone, and level of formality appropriate to audience, purpose, and genre.17.0 ptsUses objective and professional vocabulary. The use of words, sentences, and punctuation creates a consistent voice, tone, and level of formality appropriate to audience, purpose, and genre.15.0 ptsSome informality in vocabulary. The use of words, sentences, and punctuation creates an inconsistent voice, tone, or formality level that is occasionally inappropriate to the situation.12.0 ptsThe use of words, sentences, and punctuation shows a lack of awareness of the voice, tone, and formality level expected in academic writing.0.0 ptsInformal; uses slang or colloquialisms; fails to achieve tone and level of formality expected in academic writing.20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Punctuation, Spelling, Capitalization5.0 ptsVirtually free of punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.4.0 ptsOccasional punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.3.0 ptsMany punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors. Interfere with meaning in some places.2.0 ptsPunctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors that hinder communication.0.0 ptsSevere punctuation, spelling and capitalization errors.5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Sentence Structure10.0 ptsSentence structure is complex and powerful. The writer has used vivid, purposefully crafted, and varied sentence styles and lengths.8.5 ptsSentences are effective and varied in style and length.7.5 ptsSentences show limited variety in sentence style and length.6.0 ptsSentence structure is simple, without variety in sentence style and length.0.0 ptsSentence structures are awkward and/or unclear, impeding the clarity and flow of ideas.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Word Choice10.0 ptsThe writer displays a broad range of vocabulary, with effective, accurate, and contextually appropriate word usage.8.5 ptsThe writer displays a satisfactory range of vocabulary and accurate and appropriate word usage.7.5 ptsThe writer displays some varied word choice but language is mostly vague and needs more accuracy to properly convey ideas. Some errors of diction and usage are evident but do not interfere significantly with readability.6.0 ptsThe writer displays a limited range of vocabulary. Errors of diction and usage are evident and begin to interfere significantly with readability.0.0 ptsLimited vocabulary. Diction and syntax errors are evident and impede a clear reading of the text.10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format10.0 ptsIntext and reference citations in correct APA format with no errors.8.5 ptsIntext and reference citations in correct APA format with only occasional minor error.7.5 ptsInterfere with meaning in some places. Some major errors in APA format for intext, reference citations.6.0 ptsThe writer does not use APA format, presentation, or style (citations) for the assignment or APA formatting has many major errors.0.0 ptsNo intext citations to sources and/or no list of references in APA format10.0 pts
Total Points: 185.0PreviousNext

Thiateena – 2025 Your write up should contain three well developed paragraphs 450 500 words using APA formatting

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Thiateena – 2025

 

Your write up should contain  three well-developed paragraphs (450–500 words) using APA formatting, integrating two evidence-based resources to include clinical practice guidelines as well as the course textbook.

Read the scenario and answer the following questions:

Ophthalmic Disorders

V.S., age 12 Hispanic male, presents with a feeling that there is sand in his eye. He had a cold a week ago and woke up this morning with his left eye crusted with yellowish drainage. On physical examination, he has injected conjunctiva on the left side, no adenopathy, and no vision changes. His vision is 20/20. Fluorescein staining reveals no abrasion. He is allergic to sulfa.

Diagnosis: Conjunctivitis

  1. List specific goals of treatment for V.S.
  2. What drug therapy would you prescribe? Why?
  3. What are the parameters for monitoring the success of the therapy?
  4. Discuss the education you would give to the parents regarding drug therapy.
  5. List one or two adverse reactions for the selected agent that would cause you to change therapy.
  6. What would be the choice for second-line therapy?
  7. What over-the-counter or alternative medications would be appropriate for V.S.?
  8. What dietary and lifestyle changes should be recommended for V.S.?
  9. Describe one or two drug–drug or drug–food interactions for the selected agent.

Textbook:

 Woo, Terri Moser and Robinson, Marylou V. (2020). Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Nurse Prescribers. (5th ed.) Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company. 

W12 DQ ANP 650 – 2025 Instructions for Answer to 2 Question 1 After Each DQ question write down references 2 300 minimum words for every

by

Nursing Assignment Help

W12 DQ ANP 650 – 2025

  

Instructions for Answer to 2 Question

1- After Each DQ (question), write down references

2- 300 minimum words for every DQ, you can go up to 800 words but answer should be complete.

3- 2-3 Peer Reviewed/ scholarly references for each question

4- References should be within 4 years

5- I am in acute care nurse practitioner program.

6- The response to the DQ is expected to be a minimum of 300 words. A minimum of two peer reviewed/ scholarly  resources are expected. These need to be appropriate for a clinical professional to guide decisions about patient care. If a textbook is used for one of these responses, the other needs to be journal or professional-level website. The references need to be correctly formatted, as do the citations for those references.  “ Question words” don’t count towards 300 minimum count”

Week 2 Assignment: Searching and Evaluating Scientific and/or Mathematical/Analytical Resources (Weekly Written Assignment) – 2025 his week you will find three scholarly peer reviewed research articles on your topic Remember that next

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Week 2 Assignment: Searching and Evaluating Scientific and/or Mathematical/Analytical Resources (Weekly Written Assignment) – 2025

 

his week, you will find three scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles on your topic. Remember that next week you will submit a paper on Scientific and/or Mathematical/Analytical perspectives of inquiry, so use this week’s assignment to prepare materials and collect information for that purpose.

Use articles that will help you explain and describe scientific issues and/or statistical data or economic information related to your topic. You will analyze and evaluate these articles in your submission, which should include:

Three separate paragraphs, one for each of the three articles, each presenting:

  • A brief 3–4 sentence summary of the article (use in-text citations)
  • An explanation as to what makes this source credible (in the WCU Library go to Research Guides > Research Basics > Evaluating Resources)
  • An explanation of why the article will be useful in addressing your problem or issue

MUST USE CREDIBLE SOURCES FROM MY STUDENT PORTAL WHICH I WILL PROVIDE LOGIN INFO. 

Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child – 2025 The needs of the pediatric patient differ depending on age as do the stages of development and the

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Developmental Assessment and the School-Aged Child – 2025

The needs of the pediatric patient differ depending on age, as do the stages of development and the expected assessment findings for each stage. In a 500-750-word paper, examine the needs of a school-aged child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old and discuss the following:

  1. Compare the physical assessments among school-aged children. Describe how you would modify assessment techniques to match the age and developmental stage of the child.
  2. Choose a child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old. Identify the age of the child and describe the typical developmental stages of children that age.
  3. Applying developmental theory based on Erickson, Piaget, or Kohlberg, explain how you would developmentally assess the child. Include how you would offer explanations during the assessment, strategies you would use to gain cooperation, and potential findings from the assessment.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Critical Appraisal of Research – 2025 Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals conducted using appraisal tools to assign market values to

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Critical Appraisal of Research – 2025

 

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

To Prepare:

  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.
  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.
  • Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

Lab Assignment: Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions (NURS 6512: Advanced Health Assessment) – 2025 Properly identifying the cause and type of a patient s skin condition involves a process

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Lab Assignment: Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions (NURS 6512: Advanced Health Assessment) – 2025

Properly identifying the cause and type of a patient’s skin condition involves a process of elimination known as differential diagnosis. Using this process, a health professional can take a given set of physical abnormalities, vital signs, health assessment findings, and patient descriptions of symptoms, and incrementally narrow them down until one diagnosis is determined as the most likely cause.

In this Lab Assignment, you will examine several visual representations of various skin conditions, describe your observations, and use the techniques of differential diagnosis to determine the most likely condition.

To Prepare

· Review the Skin Conditions document provided in this week’s Learning Resources, and select one condition to closely examine for this Lab Assignment.

· Consider the abnormal physical characteristics you observe in the graphic you selected. How would you describe the characteristics using clinical terminologies?

· Explore different conditions that could be the cause of the skin abnormalities in the graphics you selected.

· Consider which of the conditions is most likely to be the correct diagnosis, and why.

· Search the Walden library for one evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed article based on the skin condition you chose for this Lab Assignment.

· Review the Comprehensive SOAP Exemplar found in this week’s Learning Resources to guide you as you prepare your SOAP note.

· Download the SOAP Template found in this week’s Learning Resources, and use this template to complete this Lab Assignment.

The Lab Assignment

Choose one This week you will be submitting your paper in SOAP format.  The template and the grading rubric for this format is located in the Course Info folder.  This is the format approved for this course, so please follow it.  You will be choosing one skin graphic to write your SOAP note. Need to organize your data in this format…..and under “S” you will need to ask your questions…but obviously your patient cannot answer you.  So….under “S”….list all of the questions that you would ask the patient from the template list, including Meds, Allergies, ROS, etc…….think about everything that you would need to know and ask to make a clinical decision.  The “O” is what the condition looks like.  This is the objective piece of the note…..you do not ask the patient questions here, it is just what you observe.    Be specific!!!  Describe the lesion ie:  size, location, characteristics, etc….  think of this as documenting directly in a patient’s chart.  A/P are your list of differentials with rationale on why you chose those diagnosis.  You list them from most likely to least likely.

· This week you will be submitting your paper in SOAP format.  The template and the grading rubric for this format is located in the Course Info folder.  This is the format approved for this course, so please follow it.  You will be choosing one skin graphic to write your SOAP note. Need to organize your data in this format…..and under “S” you will need to ask your questions…but obviously your patient cannot answer you.  So….under “S”….list all of the questions that you would ask the patient from the template list, including Meds, Allergies, ROS, etc…….think about everything that you would need to know and ask to make a clinical decision.  The “O” is what the condition looks like.  This is the objective piece of the note…..you do not ask the patient questions here, it is just what you observe.    Be specific!!!  Describe the lesion ie:  size, location, characteristics, etc….  think of this as documenting directly in a patient’s chart.  A/P are your list of differentials with rationale on why you chose those diagnosis.  You list them from most likely to least likely.