Professionalism and Social Media – 2025 Social media plays a significant role in the lives of nurses in both their professional

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Professionalism and Social Media – 2025

Social media plays a significant role in the lives of nurses in both their professional and personal lives. Additionally, social media is now considered a mainstream part of the process for recruiting and hiring candidates. Inappropriate or unethical conduct on social media can create legal problems for nurses as well as the field of nursing.

Login to all social media sites in which you engage. Review your profile, pictures, and posts. Based on the professional standards of nursing, identify items that would be considered unprofessional and potentially detrimental to your career and that negatively impact the reputation of the nursing field.

In 500-750 words, summarize the findings of your review. Include the following:

  1. Describe the posts or conversations in which you have engaged that might be considered inappropriate based on the professional standards of nursing.
  2. Discuss why nurses have a responsibility to uphold a standard of conduct consistent with the standards governing the profession of nursing at work and in their personal lives. Include a discussion of how personal conduct can violate HIPAA or be considered unethical or unprofessional. Provide an example of each to support your answer.
  3. Based on the analysis of your social media, discuss what areas of your social media activity reflect Christian values as they relate to respecting human value and dignity for all individuals. Describe areas of your social media activity that could be improved.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

W3Q1 – 2025 Watson s Caring Theory a grand theory and conceptual model in nursing is

by

Nursing Assignment Help

W3Q1 – 2025

Watson’s Caring Theory, a grand theory and conceptual model in nursing, is the underlying framework for United States University College of Nursing’s programs.  Identify a middle-range theory within her conceptual model. Clearly identify how she defines the concepts and propositions between them. Report them to the class using the form “psychosocial development (Concept A) progresses through (Proposition) stages (Concept B)”. Psychosocial development and stages are examples and NOT required for the assignment. Using the readings for the week, discuss why her work is considered a grand theory.

Expectations

Initial Post:

  • Length: A minimum of 250 words, not including references
  • Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA format from within the last 5 years
  • Due 5/13/21

mod 4 dictation assignment – 2025 Please go to the following web address https adfs rasmussen edu adfs ls wa wsignin1 0 wtrealm urn 3aextranet 3aportal wctx https 3a 2f 2fportal rasmussen edu 2f layouts 2f15 2fAuthenticate aspx 3fSource 3d 252F wreply https 3a 2f 2fportal rasmussen edu 2f trust 2fdefault aspx Please sign in with the

by

Nursing Assignment Help

mod 4 dictation assignment – 2025

 

Please go to the following web address:

https://adfs.rasmussen.edu/adfs/ls?wa=wsignin1.0&wtrealm=urn%3aextranet%3aportal&wctx=https%3a%2f%2fportal.rasmussen.edu%2f_layouts%2f15%2fAuthenticate.aspx%3fSource%3d%252F&wreply=https%3a%2f%2fportal.rasmussen.edu%2f_trust%2fdefault.aspx Please sign in with the following information:

Username: [email protected]

Password: Addie!0823

Click on M120/HSC1531 Section 02 Medical Terminology (5.5 Weeks) – Online Plus – 2021 Spring Quarter Term 1, then click on Module 04 – Lymphatic, Cardiovascular, and Respiratory Systems and then click on Module 04 Dictation Assignment and complete that assignment. 

Kotter’s stage 7 and 8 – 2025 Evaluate how your identified organization has utilized Kotter s stage 7 and 8

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Kotter’s stage 7 and 8 – 2025

 

  • Evaluate how your identified organization has utilized Kotter’s stage 7 and 8 of consolidating changes to produce more change and anchored the new approaches within the organization. This should be approximately 700-1000 words.
    • Stage 7:  Consolidating Gains and Producing More Change
    • Stage 8:  Anchoring New Approaches in the Culture

Please use peer reviewed articles.

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification – 2025 This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information Assessment 2

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification – 2025

 This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 2); design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 3); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 4). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace. 

Please see attached documents

template, interview question, instructions

Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative – 2025 This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative – 2025

This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles and four boxes approach.

Based on the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and other required topic study materials, you will complete the “Applying the Four Principles: Case Study” document that includes the following:

Part 1: Chart

This chart will formalize the four principles and four boxes approach and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

Part 2: Evaluation

This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

Week 7: Reflection on Learning – 2025 Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to reflect on

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Week 7: Reflection on Learning – 2025

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to reflect on the weekly concepts learned in the course. 

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

CO1: Integrate evidence-based and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1,4)

CO2: Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve health outcome. (PO 1, 2)

CO3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth through a spirit of inquiry, scholarship, and service in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3, 4)

CO4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 5)

CO5: Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Requirements:

You will need to post your reflection here before you are able to see other students’ posts. 

Reflection: write 1-2 paragraphs reflecting on your learning for the week. Guiding questions are provided or you may write about what you felt was most significant to you for the week.

  1. In looking at the possible types of dissemination, which appeals to you most? Why?
  2. What steps could you take to share the results of your week 7 project in a professional setting?  

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal – 2025 In this assignment students will pull together the capstone project change proposal components they have been working

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal – 2025

 

In this assignment, students will pull together the capstone project change proposal components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. For this project, the student will apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Develop a 1,250-1,500 written project that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

  1. Background
  2. Clinical problem statement.
  3. Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient care in the changing health care system.
  4. PICOT question.
  5. Literature search strategy employed.
  6. Evaluation of the literature.
  7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized.
  8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures.
  9. Discussion of how evidence-based practice was used in creating the intervention plan.
  10. Plan for evaluating the proposed nursing intervention.
  11. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome.
  12. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created.

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Question Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use this feedback to make appropriate revisions to these before submitting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

1.1:     Exemplify professionalism in diverse health care settings.

2.2:     Comprehend nursing concepts and health theories.

3.2:     Implement patient care decisions based on evidence-based practice.

Cognition and the Neurologic System – 2025 Use the Episodic Focused SOAP Template and create an episodic focused note about the patient

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Cognition and the Neurologic System – 2025

Use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the  resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis, and justify why you selected each. 

Assignment 3 Rubric & Answers – Perry – 2025 Question Answers Possible Points Is the study population identified and described Are eligibility criteria specified

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment 3 Rubric & Answers – Perry – 2025

      

Question

Answers

Possible Points

  

Is the study population identified and   described? Are eligibility criteria specified? 

–

–

  

Study Population

5

 

Eligibility criteria

5

 

2.  

Dependent   variable

6

 

3.  

Independent   variable

6

  

What approach do the authors use to   establish content validity?

Content validity is the “degree to which an   instrument has an appropriate sample of items for the construct being   measured and adequately covers the construct domain.” To ensure a   “content-valid” instrument, researchers should start with a conceptualization   of the construct. This can be based on:

· First-hand   knowledge

· Literature   review

· Expert   consultations

· Preliminary   qualitative studies

6

  

What type of sampling plan was used?   Would an alternative sampling plan have been preferable? Was the sampling   plan one that could be expected to yield a representative sample?

–

–

  

Sampling plan. 

5

  

Alternative sampling plan

2

  

Sampling plan yielding representative   sample

2

  

If sampling was stratified, was a useful   stratification variable selected? If a consecutive sample was used, was the   time period long enough to address seasonal or temporal variation?

–

–

  

Stratification

1

  

Consecutive sampling

1

 

7.  

If   cluster sampling was utilized, what were the clusters and   how was sampling done within clusters? 

2

  

How were people recruited into the   sample? Does the method suggest potential biases?

–

–

  

Recruitment

4

  

Potential biases

4

  

Did some factor other than the   sampling plan affect the representativeness of the sample?

5

  

Are possible sample biases or   weaknesses identified by the researchers themselves?

5

  

Are key characteristics of the sample   described (e. g., mean age, percent female)? If yes, please provide detailed   information on sample characteristics.

12

  

Was the sample size justified on the   basis of a power analysis or other rationale?

5

 

13.  

What approach do the authors use to check   for internal reliability? 

5

 

14.  

What approach do the authors use to   establish interrater reliability?

2

 

15.  

What approach do the authors use to   establish test-retest reliability?

2

 

16.  

What approach do the authors use to   establish discriminant validity?

Discriminant   validity is “the ability to differentiate a construct from other similar   constructs.”

5

  

Does the sample support inferences   about external validity? To whom can the study results reasonably be   generalized?

–

–

  

External validity

5

  

Generalizability

5