Prescribing for Children and Adolescent – 2025 PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTION BELOW 4 REFERENCES ZERO PLAGIARISM Psychotropic drugs are commonly used for children and

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Prescribing for Children and Adolescent – 2025

PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTION BELOW

4 REFERENCES 

ZERO PLAGIARISM

Psychotropic drugs are commonly used for children and adolescents to treat mental health disorders, yet many of these drugs are not FDA approved for use in these populations. Thus, their use is considered “off-label,” and it is often up to the best judgment of the prescribing clinician. As a PMHNP, you will need to apply the best available information and research on pharmacological treatments for children in order to safely and effectively treat child and adolescent patients. Sometimes this will come in the form of formal studies and approvals for drugs in children. Other times you may need to extrapolate from research or treatment guidelines on drugs in adults. Each individual patient case will need to be considered independently and each treatment considered from a risk assessment standpoint. What psychotherapeutic approach might be indicated as an initial treatment? What are the potential side effects of a particular drug?

For this Assignment, you consider these questions and others as you explore FDA-approved (“on label”) pharmacological treatments, non-FDA-approved (“off-label”) pharmacological treatments, and nonpharmacological treatments for disorders in children and adolescents.

Reference:

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015). Off-label drugs: What you need to know. https://www.ahrq.gov/patients-consumers/patient-involvement/off-label-drug-usage.html

To Prepare

  • Your Instructor will assign a specific disorder for you to research for this Assignment.
  • Use the Walden library to research evidence-based treatments for your assigned disorder in children and adolescents. You will need to recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating this disorder in children and adolescents.

The Assignment (1–2 pages)

  • Recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating your assigned disorder in children and adolescents.
  • Explain the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. What are the risks and benefits of the FDA-approved medicine? What are the risks and benefits of the off-label drug?
  • Explain whether clinical practice guidelines exist for this disorder and, if so, use them to justify your recommendations. If not, explain what information you would need to take into consideration.
  • Support your reasoning with at least three scholarly resources, one each on the FDA-approved drug, the off-label, and a non-medication intervention for the disorder. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

WK 2 NRNP 6635 DISCUSSION – 2025 Discussion The Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence Based Rating Scales Assessment tools have two primary purposes 1 to

by

Nursing Assignment Help

WK 2 NRNP 6635 DISCUSSION – 2025

Discussion: The Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales

Assessment tools have two primary purposes: 1) to measure illness and diagnose clients, and 2) to measure a client’s response to treatment. Often, you will find that multiple assessment tools are designed to measure the same condition or response. Not all tools, however, are appropriate for use in all clinical situations. You must consider the strengths and weaknesses of each tool to select the appropriate assessment tool for your client. For this Discussion, as you examine the assessment tool assigned to you by the Course Instructor, consider its use in psychotherapy.

Photo Credit: [shironosov]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

To Prepare:
  • Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide regarding psychiatric assessment and diagnosis.
  • Consider the elements of the psychiatric interview, history, and examination.
  • Consider the assessment tool assigned to you by the Course Instructor.
By Day 3 of Week 2

Post a brief explanation of three important components of the psychiatric interview and why you consider these elements important. Explain the psychometric properties of the rating scale you were assigned. Explain when it is appropriate to use this rating scale with clients during the psychiatric interview and how the scale is helpful to a nurse practitioner’s psychiatric assessment. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)

American  Psychiatric Association. (2013). Section I: DSM-5 basics. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., pp. 5–29). Author.

Carlat, D. J. (2017). The psychiatric interview (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 34, Writing Up the Results of the Interview

Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 5, Examination and Diagnosis of the Psychiatric Patient
Chapter 6, Classification in Psychiatry
Chapter 31, Child Psychiatry (Sections 31.1 and 31.2 only)

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1995). Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents. https://www.aacap.org/App_Themes/AACAP/docs/practice_parameters/psychiatric_assessment_practice_parameter.pdf
 

American Psychiatric Association. (2016). Practice guidelines for the psychiatric evaluation of adults (3rd ed.). https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.books.9780890426760

Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2017). Classification in psychiatry. In Kaplan and Sadock’s Concise Textbook of Clinical Psychiatry (4th ed., pp. 1–8). Wolters Kluwer.

Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2017). Psychiatric interview, history, and mental status examination. In Kaplan and Sadock’s Concise Textbook of Clinical Psychiatry (4th ed., pp. 9–15). Wolters Kluwer.

Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2017). Medical assessment and laboratory testing in psychiatry. In Kaplan and Sadock’s Concise Textbook of Clinical Psychiatry (4th ed., pp. 16–21). Wolters Kluwer.

Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

Classroom Productions. (Producer). (2015). Diagnostic criteria [Video]. Walden University.

MedEasy. (2017). Psychiatric history taking and the mental status examination | USMLE & COMLEX [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5KwDgWX8L8

Psychiatry Lectures. (2015). Psychiatry lecture: How to do a psychiatric assessment [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRiCntvec5U

 USE 6 RESOURCES/REFERENCES FROM THE SCHOOL LEARNING RESOURCES.

Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal – 2025 Develop a 2 4 page proposal for a policy that should help to improve health

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal – 2025

 

Develop a 2–4-page proposal for a policy that should help to improve health care and outcomes for your target population.

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Cost and access to care continue to be main concerns for patients and providers. As technology improves our ability to care for and improve outcomes in patients with chronic and complex illnesses, questions of cost and access become increasingly important. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you must be able to develop policies that will ensure the delivery of care that is effective and can be provided in an ethical and equitable manner.

SHOW LESS

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.
    • Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
  • Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.
    • Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high quality outcomes.
  • Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.
    • Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
  • Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
    • Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
    • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

CONTEXT:

 As a master’s-prepared nurse, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice with which to advocate for policy developments. As a nurse leader and health care practitioner, often on the front lines of helping individuals and populations, you are able to articulate and advocate for the patient more than any other professional group in health care. This is especially true of populations that may be underserved, underrepresented, or are otherwise lacking a voice. By advocating for and developing policies, you are able to help drive improvements in outcomes for specific populations. The policies you advocate for could be internal ones (just within a specific department or health care setting) that ensure quality care and compliance. Or they could be external policies (local, state, or federal) that may have more wide-ranging effects on best practices and regulations. 

Questions to Consider:

 

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

SHOW LESS

Assessment 2 will build on the health issue, vulnerable population, and position that you started to develop in the first assessment. For Assessment 2, you will develop a proposal for a policy and a set of guidelines that could be implemented to ensure improvements in care and outcomes.

  • What are the relevant best practices from a population health standpoint (cultural competence, disease prevention, and interventions) for your chosen health issue and vulnerable population?
    • How are these best practices relevant to your chosen health issue and vulnerable population?
      • Do the best practices make any reference to standards of care or benchmarks that should be achieved?
    • How could these best practices be leveraged to help inform or develop a policy and guidelines to improve care and outcomes for the vulnerable population you are working with?
  • How could technology be used to identify health concerns or collect data that could help health care practitioners determine which health care issues to focus on in a population?
    • What are the relevant laws, regulations, or policies for employing any of the technology you might find useful?
  • What type of policy and guidelines would be most likely to ensure improvements in care and outcomes related to your chosen health issue and vulnerable population?
    • Are there any policies in existence that could help inform your own policy development?
    • How might your proposed policy and guidelines influence the way in which care is accessed?
    • How might your proposed policy and guidelines influence the amount of access that is available?

 

Scenario

The analysis of position papers that your interprofessional team presented to the committee has convinced them that it would be worth the time and effort to develop a new policy to address your specific issue in the target population. To that end, your interprofessional team has been asked to submit a policy proposal that outlines a specific approach to improving the outcomes for your target population. This proposal should be supported by evidence and best practices that illustrate why the specific approaches are likely to be successful. Additionally, you have been asked to address the ways in which applying your policy to interprofessional teams could lead to efficiency or effectiveness gains.

Instructions

For this assessment you will develop a policy proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for the health care issue and target population you addressed in Assessment 1. If for some reason you wish to change your specific issue and/or target population, contact your FlexPath faculty.

The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

  • Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
  • Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
  • Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes.
  • Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
  • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example, linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Additional Requirements

  • Length of proposal: 2–4 double-spaced, typed pages, not including title page or reference list. Your proposal should be succinct yet substantive.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that supports the relevance of or need for your policy, as well as interprofessional considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
  • APA formatting: Use the APA Style Paper Template linked in the Resources. An APA Style Paper Tutorial is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your analysis.

Grading Rubric:

1-  Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population. 

Passing Grade:  Proposes a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population. Acknowledges potential difficulties and discusses how those challenges will be met. 

2-  Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population. 

Passing Grade:  Advocates the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population. Impartially considers contrary data and opposing viewpoints. 

3-  Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes. 

Passing Grade:  Analyzes the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes. Identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the analysis). 

4-  Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. 

Passing Grade:  Communicates proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Identifies specific strategies or approaches used to ensure clear communication. 

5-  Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style 

Passing Grade:  Integrates relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Citations are free from all errors. 

Discussion post – 2025 After reviewing the Psychosocial Care of the Elderly source found in the Learning Materials

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Discussion post – 2025

After reviewing the Psychosocial Care of the Elderly source found in the Learning Materials in Module 3, discuss surprising facts about the psychosocial care of the aging. Did you originally consider any of these as myths, when in reality they are based on evidence? How can nurses influence attitudes among caregivers and the public about aging? 

5-3 FINAL PROJECT MILESTONE TWO: POPULATION, 2 Page APA – 2025 I Population In this section of your final project you will summarize key elements of the

by

Nursing Assignment Help

5-3 FINAL PROJECT MILESTONE TWO: POPULATION, 2 Page APA – 2025

I. Population: In this section of your final project, you will summarize key elements of the research study and analyze the population impacted by the
health issue.
A. Summarize the people, places, and times represented in the research study to provide context for yourreport.
B. Describe three social and behavioral determinants strongly associated with the public health issue in the research study. Be sure to cite specific
examples from the research study to support your description.
C. Describe three known disparities associated with the health of the specific population. Be sure to cite specific examples from the research
study to support your description.
D. Explain how the identified social and behavioral determinants relate to the disparities you identified, and explain yourreasoning.
II. Health Issue:
F. Using your research and analysis, draw connections between the population and public health issue. Consider where you identified common
elements, what you learned about the public health issue by studying the population, and what you learned about the population by studying
the public health issue.

proportion of women in Congress – 2025 Research the proportion of women African Americans Native Americans Hispanic Americans Asian Americans

by

Nursing Assignment Help

proportion of women in Congress – 2025

 Research the proportion of women, African Americans, Native Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans and openly gay or lesbian members of Congress.

  1. Reflect on what these patterns say about the nature of representation.
  2. Why do some groups tend to be underrepresented in Congress?
  3. Why do you see a trend in which more women and minorities are being represented?
  4. Do you think the underrepresentation of women and minorities affect Congress’s business?
  5. How might we as a people address this situation and strive towards equal representation? Make sure to cite sources used.
  • Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to textbook if cited)

nursing – 2025 Develop a personal philosophy and framework acknowledging professional and accrediting agency competencies relating to the role and scope of practice

by

Nursing Assignment Help

nursing – 2025

  

Develop a personal philosophy and framework acknowledging professional and accrediting agency competencies relating to the role and scope of practice of the family nurse practitioner.

nursing

Description

Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

Instructions

Develop a personal philosophy and framework acknowledging professional and accrediting agency competencies relating to the role and scope of practice of the family nurse practitioner. Identify a nurse theorist that you align your current/ planned practice and how they provide the foundation for this philosophy development.

Describe the type of educational courses and professional requirements required for APRN professional certification and licensing within the state that you will practice.

Identify the precise application process for your certification exam, your state regulations for application for prescriptive authority/practice, and issues related to APRN practice within your state.

Evaluate and discuss APRN roles and prescriptive privileges and impact on client safety and care https://essaypandit.com/essay-papers/

Compare the differences between prescriptive authority, credentialing, and clinical privileges and how each of these impact client safety and care

Evaluate the development of the advanced practice nurse role from a global perspective.

Assignment Guidelines:

1200 – 1500 word paper (not including the cover page and references)

Required APA 7th edition for references and citations

Include a minimum of 6 scholarly references (does not include text or websites) and the majority of references must not be older than 5 years

Demonstrate analysis, https://theeliteessaywriters.com/blogessays/ evaluation and synthesis of information (see the rubric for specifics)

Estimated time to complete:  6 hours

Rubric

NU 626 Unit 2 APNs and State Regulations Rubric

NU 626 Unit 2 APNs and State Regulations Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 45 pts

5

Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context, audience, and purpose that is responsive to the assigned task(s) and focuses all elements of the work. 41 pts

4

Demonstrates adequate consideration of context, audience, and purpose and a clear focus on the assigned task(s) (e.g., the task aligns with audience, purpose, and context). 36 pts

3

Demonstrates awareness of context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., begins to show awareness of audience’s perceptions and assumptions). 31 pts

2

Demonstrates minimal attention to context, audience, purpose, and to the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., expectation of instructor or self as audience). 27 pts

1

Little to no description of purpose and contents of paper. 0 pts

0

Not attempted

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Development 45 pts

5

Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer’s understanding, and shaping the whole work. 41 pts

4

Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to explore ideas within the context of the discipline and shape the whole work. 36 pts

3

Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop and explore ideas through most of the work. 31 pts

2

Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop simple ideas in some parts of the work. 27 pts

1

Little to no description of purpose and contents of paper. 0 pts

0

Not attempted

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting 25 pts

5

Demonstrates detailed attention to and successful execution of a wide range of conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task (s) including organization, content, presentation, formatting, and stylistic choices. 23 pts

4

Demonstrates consistent use of important conventions particular to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s), including organization, content, presentation, and stylistic choices. 20 pts

3

Follows expectations appropriate to a specific discipline and/or writing task(s) for basic organization, content, and presentation. 18 pts

2

Attempts to use a consistent system for basic organization and presentation. 15 pts

1

Lacks evidence of clear, organized, comprehensive writing. 0 pts

0

Not attempted.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 10 pts

5

Demonstrates skillful use of high-quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing. 9 pts

4

Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing. 8 pts

3

Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing. 7 pts

2

Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in the writing. 6 pts

1

Does not include both APA and In- Text Citations or In-text citations and references are not in APA format. 0 pts

0

Not attempted.

10 pts

Total Points: 125

PreviousNext

Instruction Files

The-description-of-2-2-of-homework_-43423.docx

20.5 KB

sample-of-2-2_-434221.docx

13.8 KB

The-scope-of-NP-of-CA_-43420.pdf

359.5 KB

nevada-np-scope_-434211.pdf

359.5 KB

Nursing Concept Analysis – 2025 Description of the Assignment This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of one concept

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Nursing Concept Analysis – 2025

 

Description of the Assignment 

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of one concept that is important and useful to the nurse practitioner role.  The concept for this assignment must be supported by a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application as demonstrated through the creation of a model case. Theoretical applications of the concept are also discussed. Non-nursing theories may not be used. Scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.  

Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.

Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is not allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance. Please note: the concepts of caring or cultural humility are not permitted for this assignment.

  • Adaptation
  • Burnout
  • Civility
  • Comfort
  • Compassion
  • Compassion fatigue
  • Competence
  • Empowerment
  • Engagement
  • Health
  • Leadership
  • Meaningfulness
  • Modeling
  • Noise
  • Pain
  • Palliative care
  • Quality of life
  • Resilience
  • Self-care
  • Sensory overload
  • Situational awareness

Criteria for Content 

  1. Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept
    • Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section only)
    • Support from nursing literature is required.

  2. Defining attributes:

  • A minimum of three (3) attributes are required.
  • Support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation:  An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept.  For this question, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed. 

  1. Antecedent and Consequence
    • 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.
    • 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
    • Support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation:  An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that happens before an event. An antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept. A consequence follows or is the result of an event.  The selected consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.  

  4. Model Case

  • 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:
    • Definition
    • All identified attributes
  1. Theoretical Applications of the Concept
    • Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.
    • Support from nursing literature is required.
  2. Reflection
    • Reflect on how the concept analysis findings apply to your advanced nursing practice, specifically as an NP.
    • Self-reflection may be written in first-person.

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. The worksheet should be typed, double spaced, and written in complete sentences. (Concept Analysis Worksheet) (Links to an external site.)
  2. Reference page and in-text citations must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual.
  3. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing Non-nursing theories may not be used.
  4. A minimum of 4 (four) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may not be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is not counted as one of the 4 required scholarly nursing references. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.
  5. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
  6. Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.
  7. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
  8. Please note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT 

Category 

Points 

% 

Description 

Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept 

20 

11 

  • Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY)  
  • Support from nursing literature is required.  

Defining Attributes 

25 

14 

  • A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.  
  • Support from nursing literature is required  

Antecedent & Consequence 

25 

14 

  • 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.  
  • 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. 
  • Support from nursing literature is required  

Model Case 

25 

14 

  • 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: 
  • Definition 
  • All identified attributes 
  • NP perspective  

Theoretical Applications of the Concept 

25 

14 

  • Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.  
  • Support from nursing literature is required.  

Reflection 

25 

14 

  • Reflect on how the concept analysis findings apply to your advanced nursing practice, specifically as an NP.  
  • Self-reflection may be written in first-person. 

Total CONTENT Points= [145 pts] 

ASSIGNMENT FORMAT 

Category 

Points 

% 

Description 

Paper Specifications 

10 

6 

A nursing theory was used. 

The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.  Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.   

Minimum of 4 scholarly nursing references 

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. 

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them. 

APA Format (current edition) 

10 

6 

References must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual.  

One deduction for each type of APA style error 

Citations in Text 

5 

3 

Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly. 

Writing Mechanics 

5 

3 

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual. 

Total FORMAT Points= [30 pts] 

ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 175 points 

Rubric

NR501NP WK3 Concept Analysis_UPDATEMAR20NR501NP WK3 Concept Analysis_UPDATEMAR20CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of Selected Concept20 ptsExcellentPresentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.18 ptsV. GoodPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.16 ptsSatisfactoryPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited support from scholarly sources.10 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefining Attributes25 ptsExcellentPresentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes Support from scholarly sources provided.23 ptsV. GoodPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Support from scholarly sources provided.21 ptsSatisfactoryPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Limited support from scholarly sources provided.13 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: One or two attributes of the selected nursing concepts were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: No attributes of the selected nursing concept were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAntecedent & Consequence25 ptsExcellentPresentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.23 ptsV. GoodPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.21 ptsSatisfactoryPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.13 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly literature was provided.25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeModel Case25 ptsExcellentPresentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: Definition All identified attributes NP perspective23 ptsV. GoodPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: Definition All identified attributes NP perspective21 ptsSatisfactoryPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements OR fails to meet expectations in one element 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: Definition All identified attributes NP perspective13 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation of information in two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: Definition All identified attributes NP perspective0 ptsUnsatisfactoryPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: Definition All identified attributes NP perspective25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Applications of the Concept25 ptsExcellentPresentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.23 ptsV. GoodPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.21 ptsSatisfactoryPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.13 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection25 ptsExcellentPresentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Reflect on how the concept analysis findings apply to your advanced nursing practice, specifically as an NP.  Self-reflection may be written in first-person.23 ptsV. GoodPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Reflect on how the concept analysis findings apply to your advanced nursing practice, specifically as an NP.  Self-reflection may be written in first-person.21 ptsSatisfactoryPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Reflect on how the concept analysis findings apply to your advanced nursing practice, specifically as an NP.  Self-reflection may be written in first-person.13 ptsNeeds ImprovementPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Reflect on how the concept analysis findings apply to your advanced nursing practice, specifically as an NP.  Self-reflection may be written0 ptsUnsatisfactoryNo reflection included25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper SpecificationsA nursing theory was used.

Minimum of 4 scholarly nursing references

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.10 ptsExcellentAll critical elements present.9 ptsV. Good3 critical elements present.8 ptsSatisfactory2 critical elements present.5 ptsNeeds Improvement1 critical element present.0 ptsUnsatisfactory0 critical elements present.10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA StyleAPA Guidelines as per the current edition of the manual are:
– demonstrated for the citations and the reference page
– there is a reference for every in-text citation and visa versa.
-One deduction for each type of APA format error.15 ptsExcellent0 to 1 APA error was present.13 ptsV. Good2 – 3 APA errors were present.12 ptsSatisfactory4 – 5 APA were are present.8 ptsNeeds Improvement6 – 7 APA were are present.0 ptsUnsatisfactory8 or greater APA errors were present.15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality5 ptsExcellentThis section included all of the required elements.4 ptsV. GoodThis section included three of the required elements.3 ptsSatisfactoryThis section included only two of the required elements.2 ptsNeeds ImprovementThis section included only one of the required elements.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThis section included none of the required elements.5 pts 

Explain the difference between spontaneous and procured abortion. As well as their Ethical impact of each one. – 2025 Explain the difference between spontaneous and procured abortion As well as their Ethical

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Explain the difference between spontaneous and procured abortion. As well as their Ethical impact of each one. – 2025

 

  1. Explain the difference between spontaneous and procured abortion. As well as their Ethical impact of each one.
  2. Why can the contraceptive pill, the IUD and the “morning after” pill also be considered abortifacients?
  3. Abortion methods, depending on the stage of pregnancy. Explain each one.
  4. Describe the Roe Vs. Wade case and provide a summary of Norma McCorvey’s life.
  5. Describe some better alternatives to abortion.
  6. Read and summarize ERD paragraphs # 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 66.

Submission Instructions:

  • The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
  • If references are used, please cite properly according to the current APA style.

Create a 1-page fact sheet that your healthcare organization could hypothetically use to explain the health or nursing informatics policy/regulation you selected. Your fact sheet should address the following: – 2025 Create a 1 page fact sheet that your healthcare organization could hypothetically use to explain

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Create a 1-page fact sheet that your healthcare organization could hypothetically use to explain the health or nursing informatics policy/regulation you selected. Your fact sheet should address the following: – 2025

 Create a 1-page fact sheet that your healthcare organization could hypothetically use to explain the health or nursing informatics policy/regulation you selected. Your fact sheet should address the following:

·   Briefly and generally explain the policy or regulation you selected.

·   Address the impact of the policy or regulation you selected on system implementation.

·   Address the impact of the policy or regulation you selected on clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow.

·   Highlight organizational policies and procedures that are/will be in place at your healthcare organization to address the policy or regulation you selected. Be specific.

77 (77%) – 85 (85%)

A fully developed and detailed Fact Sheet is provided for the Assignment.

The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail the policy and regulation selected.

The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail the impact of the policy or regulation selected on system implementation.

The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail the impact of the policy or regulation selected on clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow.

Specific and accurate responses thoroughly highlight in detail the organizational policies and procedures that are/will be in place at a healthcare organization to address the policy or regulation selected.

Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources.

 Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.