Evidence-Based Project, Critical Appraisal of Research – 2025 ONLY FOR MAESTRO Assignment Evidence Based Project Part 4 Critical Appraisal of Research Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals conducted using

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Evidence-Based Project, Critical Appraisal of Research – 2025

 ONLY FOR MAESTRO

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and consider the importance of critically appraising research evidence.
  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.
  • Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template.

Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

Human Experience Across the Health-Illness Continuum – 2025 Benchmark Human Experience Across the Health Illness Continuum The benchmark assesses the following competency Benchmark 5 1 Understand the human

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Human Experience Across the Health-Illness Continuum – 2025

     

Benchmark – Human Experience Across the   Health-Illness Continuum

The benchmark assesses the following competency:

Benchmark: 5.1. Understand the human experience across the health-illness continuum.

Research the health-illness continuum and its relevance to patient care. In a 750-1,000 word paper, discuss the relevance of the continuum to patient care and present a perspective of your current state of health in relation to the wellness spectrum. Include the following:

1. Examine the health-illness continuum and discuss why this perspective is important to consider in relation to health and the human experience when caring for patients.

2. Reflect on your overall state of health. Discuss what behaviors support or detract from your health and well-being. Explain where you currently fall on the health-illness continuum.

3. Discuss the options and resources available to you to help you move toward wellness on the health-illness spectrum. Describe how these would assist in moving you toward wellness (managing a chronic disease, recovering from an illness, self-actualization, etc.).

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Link for resourse- https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs434vn/health-assessment-foundations-for-effective-practice/v1.1/#/chapter/5

Music and Dance – 2025 Required Resources Read review the following resources for this activity Textbook Chapter 9 10

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Music and Dance – 2025

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 9, 10
  • Minimum of 1 primary source (from artist)
  • Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook – from critic)

Initial Post Instructions

Choose one of the music or dance movements that you read about this week and at least one work from that movement. Then, address the following:

  • Examine the movement and specific work in relation to historical and political influences of the movement.
  • Identify characteristics of the movement and how the work reflects these characteristics.
  • Include a statement from the artist and one from a critic.
  • Include a link to the lyrics and/or video depending on your choice

Writing Requirements

  • Minimum of 1 full page
  • Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)
  • APA format for in-text citations and list of references

Checkpoint for Certification Plan – 2025 Assignment 2 Week 7 Practicum Journal Checkpoint for Certification Plan Students will Evaluate progress on certification

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Checkpoint for Certification Plan – 2025

  

Assignment 2: Week 7 Practicum Journal: Checkpoint for Certification Plan

Students will:

· Evaluate progress on certification plans

Report your progress on the Certification Plan completed in Week 1 and submitted in Week 4.

· What have you done to prepare for your certification?

· Have you completed the scheduled tasks assigned on your timeline? If not, what are your plans to stay on schedule?

Assignment 1: Assessing Clients With Addictive Disorders – 2025 To prepare Review this week s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide Review the Levy Family video Episodes

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment 1: Assessing Clients With Addictive Disorders – 2025

 

To prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide.
  • Review the Levy Family video Episodes 1 through 5.

The Assignment

In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:

  • After watching Episode 1, describe:
    • What is Mr. Levy’s perception of the problem?
    • What is Mrs. Levy’s perception of the problem?
    • What can be some of the implications of the problem on the family as a whole?
  • After watching Episode 2, describe:
    • What did you think of Mr. Levy’s social worker’s ideas?
    • What were your thoughts of her supervisor’s questions about her suggested therapies and his advice to Mr. Levy’s supervisor?
  • After watching Episode 3, discuss the following:
    • What were your thoughts about the way Mr. Levy’s therapist responded to what Mr. Levy had to say?
    • What were your impressions of how the therapist worked with Mr. Levy? What did you think about the therapy session as a whole?
    • Informed by your knowledge of pathophysiology, explain the physiology of deep breathing (a common technique that we use in helping clients to manage anxiety). Explain how changing breathing mechanics can alter blood chemistry.
    • Describe the therapeutic approach his therapist selected. Would you use exposure therapy with Mr. Levy? Why or why not? What evidence exists to support the use of exposure therapy (or the therapeutic approach you would consider if you disagree with exposure therapy)?
  • In Episode 4, Mr. Levy tells a very difficult story about Kurt, his platoon officer.
    • Discuss how you would have responded to this revelation.
    • Describe how this information would inform your therapeutic approach. What would you say/do next?
  • In Episode 5, Mr. Levy’s therapist is having issues with his story.
    • Imagine that you were providing supervision to this therapist, how would you respond to her concerns?
  • Support your approach with evidence-based literature.

Note: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Community Level Interventions – 2025 Community Level Interventions The windshield survey summary will require you to apply what you have learned through your basic windshield

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Community Level Interventions – 2025

 

Community Level Interventions 

The windshield survey summary will require you to apply what you have learned through your basic windshield survey of Sentinel City® to a target population of your choosing. You will complete your project by comparing data from Sentinel City® with similar data from the city where your target population lives.

Your presentation will include 9 parts, which are described in detail below and include details in the speaker notes.

I. Introduction

Provide a brief introduction that identifies the demographics for the city where your target population lives.

II. Description of Your Target Population

Compose a detailed description of your chosen target population. In this section, you will describe the demographic characteristics of your chosen target population, including the population’s socioeconomic status, vital statistics, education level, religion, and occupations. Include a table, graph, and/or figure display that includes relevant demographic data for your target population. 

III. Comparison of Sentinel City Demographic Data

Compare the demographic data of Sentinel City® with the demographic data from the city where your target population is located. You should present this information in a clear to understand table.

IV. Key Health Concerns or Issues

Present a list of the top 3 health concerns for your target population. Provide a brief description of these concerns and include data from your target population city that supports the rationale for selecting these health concerns. Select one of the 3 health concerns you identified and state why you decided to develop an intervention that addresses these particular health concerns/issues. Include the Healthy People 2020 objective that relates to your identified health concerns. 

V. Community Health Nursing Diagnosis

Develop a community health nursing diagnosis based on your analysis of the demographic and health status data that you gathered.

Your community health nursing diagnosis should be written using the following format (Nies & McEwen, 2011, p. 101):

Increased risk of (disability, disease, etc.) among (community or population) related to (disability, disease, etc.) as demonstrated in or by (health status indicator, or etiological/causal statement).

Examples:

Increased risk of obesity among school age children related to lack of safe outdoor play areas for children as demonstrated by above average BMI rates. 

Increased risk of depression among persons with a physical disability related to the lack of handicap accessible facilities and social isolation as demonstrated by high suicide rate

VI. A & B. Intervention to Address the Diagnosis

Describe your proposed intervention that will address the community health nursing diagnosis for your target population. You may choose to develop your own intervention or modify one that was recommended by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (TFCPS).

To view recommended interventions, visit the TFCPS website and select the topic you plan on addressing for your intervention. (Note: at the bottom of most topic pages on the TFCPS website there is a sample on how to cite the webpage. After reviewing the topics, click the “Resources” tab then click “Fact Sheets”. Here you may find fact sheets to share with your mentor at your practice learning site.)

Whether you modify an existing intervention or develop one of your own, you must discuss why this intervention will or why you needed to modify it because it would not work for your target population. Include advantages, population fit, and barriers in use of the intervention. You should include the long-term goals, two measurable objectives, and the required resources such as: time, equipment, finances, etc. [Note: you are not required to carry out your intervention]

VII. Evaluation Plan

Describe your method for evaluating the objectives of your intervention (for example, pre/post-test, survey, questionnaire, phone interview).  Include one long term goal and two short-term measurable objectives.

Example of goals and measurable objectives:

Goal – To increase my potential for promotion at my place of employment

Objective – Complete all undergraduate nursing courses with a B+ or higher

Objective – Complete the American Sentinel University BSN program before 2020

Goal – To learn about public health nursing

Objective – Describe community health levels of prevention

Objective – List the 8 subsystems of a community

VIII. Summary of Sentinel City®

Summarize the assets (strengths) in Sentinel City® pertaining to the 8 community subsystems. In addition to the “people” (the core) of the community, there are eight subsystems that come together to form the assessment data for your windshield survey, which will contribute to your overall community assessment of Sentinel City®. The eight subsystems within every community include: 1) physical environment, 2) safety and transportation, 3) health and social services, 4) education, 5) recreation, 6) politics and government, 7) communication, and 8) economics.

Include your recommendations for improving/strengthening specific subsystems in Sentinel City®.  Discuss other recommended changes or additions needed to improve the health of the population living in Sentinel City®.

IX. Reference List

Include references that were used as you developed your plan.

For the purpose of this assessment cite the Sentinel City® demographic data as follows:

U. S. Census Bureau. (2010). American FactFinder fact sheet:  Sentinel City, USA Retrieved January 31, 2014, from https://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/

Reading and Resources

Harkness & DeMarco (2016) Read Chapter 9 (p. 154-161, 163-168)

Visit the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (TFCPS). The Community Guide.

Additional Instructions:

  • All submissions should have a title page and reference page.
  • Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.
  • Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.
  • Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.
  • Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.

Submission Options

Instructions:

Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation

  • 14 to 20 slides. Add title and reference slides.
  • Follow Rules of 7.

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research – 2025 Assignment Evidence Based Project Part 4 Critical Appraisal of Research Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals conducted using appraisal tools to assign market

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research – 2025

  

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

To Prepare:

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.

· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.

· Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

_Assignment_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

   

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

 

Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
 

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed   articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool   Worksheet Template. Be sure to include:
 

·   An Evaluation Table

45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The critical   appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. The   responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of   the peer-reviewed articles selected.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

The critical   appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. The responses provide an   accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some   specificity.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

The critical   appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. The   responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the   peer-reviewed articles selected.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

The critical   appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is   missing.

 

Part 4B: Evidence-Based Best Practices
 

Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges   from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying   your proposal with APA citations of the research.

32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The responses   accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned   to the research reviewed.
 

  The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice,   with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the   field. The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two   outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained. The response fully   integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific   resources that fully support the responses provided.
 

  Accurate, complete, and full APA citations are provided for the research   reviewed.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The responses   accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research   reviewed.
 

  The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately   justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. The   responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource   reviewed on the best practice explained. The response integrates at least one   outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support   the responses provided.
 

  Accurate and complete APA citations are provided for the research reviewed.

25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The responses   inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the   research reviewed.
 

  The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with   inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in   the field. The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside   resources reviewed on the best practice explained. The response minimally   integrates resources that may support the responses provided.
 

  Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations are provided for the research   reviewed.

0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The responses   inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the   research reviewed or are missing.
 

  The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with   inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in   the field, or are missing. A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside   resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing.   The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses   provided.
 

  Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations are provided for the research   reviewed or is missing.

 

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and   Organization:
 

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed   ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are   carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.   A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided   which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
 

  A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is   provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of   the time.
 

  Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is   brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79%   of the time.
 

  Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off   topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less   than 60% of the time.
 

  No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

 

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
 

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct   grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (one   or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several   (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (five   or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the   reader’s understanding.

 

Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct   APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations,   page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference   list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA   format with no errors.

W#11 Health Promo – 2025 This discussion will allow you to examine several different preventive guidelines related to vaccinations Please read the following four scenarios

by

Nursing Assignment Help

W#11 Health Promo – 2025

This discussion will allow you to examine several different preventive guidelines related to vaccinations. Please read the following four scenarios and choose ONE for your initial post; be sure to address all the questions posed by the scenario and include at least three scholarly sources within your initial post.

Immunizations 

1. Patient #1: Two five-year-old girls are on your schedule for a kindergarten physical. The foster parent of one of the children indicates she received all her immunization from birth to one year of age, but after that the child has not had any further vaccines. The second child appears to have been vaccinated per the CDC schedule. 

–  Is there a difference in the immunization plan you will initiate today for these two patients? Why or why not? 

– What immunizations will you be ordering for each of these two patients today? 

2. Patient #2: Today you have two patients on your schedule for the HPV vaccine. One is a 27-year-old female. In taking her health history, you find that she is sexually active and that she had a splenectomy when she was 17. The second patient is an eleven-year-old female whose mother is concerned and wants to discuss the vaccine further before consenting. She feels that by giving the child the vaccine she is giving her permission to be sexually active. 

– What type of immunizations will you recommend and why for each of these patients? 

– What type of counseling will you provide in each of these scenarios related to their immunization needs? 

3. Patient #3: The following two patients present for their yearly physicals before going to spend the holidays with their grandchildren, who are two months, 18 months, and seven years of age. The 72-year-old male states he “doesn’t want a flu shot” because he’s afraid he will just get sick like his neighbor who got her shot last week; however, his 67-year-old wife, who you are also seeing for a follow-up related to shingles she had a month ago, states, “I want the flu vaccine, but I don’t need the shingles vaccine now since I’ve already had it.” 

– How will you counsel these individuals? Are there risks related to the children from either party? – 

– What adult immunizations should be recommended for these patients? 

4. Patient #4: Your final patient of the day is a three-month-old baby. The nurse states that the mom is refusing vaccinations today even though though the baby’s records show she is up to date on her immunizations. Mom explains that she feels like her baby is getting “too many” shots and since everyone else is being vaccinated then they can skip a few of the vaccines and her baby will be just fine. 

– What is herd immunity and how can this help protect individuals who are not vaccinated? What are the rates for your state related to immunizations, and how could this affect herd immunity?

– What immunizations should this patient receive today, and is there any leeway in the schedule to help alleviate some of the mom’s concerns?

INSTRUCTIONS

– Please include at least 3 scholarly sources within your initial post.

– APA style.

– Turnitin Assignment (No plagiarism)

Note: My background for you to have as a reference: I am currently enrolled in the Psych Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Program, I am a Registered Nurse. I work in a Psychiatric Hospital.

HQ3 – 2025 Before submitting your Assessment carefully review the rubric This is the same rubric the assessor will use to

by

Nursing Assignment Help

HQ3 – 2025

 

Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission, and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.

All submissions must follow the conventions of scholarly writing. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided, where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring.

heritage assessment paper – 2025 Heritage Assessment Tool Instructions Interview an older member of your family Use the Heritage Assessment Tool

by

Nursing Assignment Help

heritage assessment paper – 2025

 

Heritage Assessment Tool

Instructions:

  1. Interview an older member of your family
  2. Use the Heritage Assessment Tool found in Appendix B, page 276 of your textbook as a starting point for your interview. SEE ATTCH
  3. Summarize what practices your family member used to maintain, protect and restore health. (Include one example)
  4. Your paper should be:
    • One (1) page
    • Typed according to APA style for margins, formating and spacing standards 
      • See NUR3045 – Library (located on left-side on menu) for tutorial Using APA Style
    • Typed into a Microsoft Word document, save the file, and then upload the file