Web-Based Healthcare Information Assessment – 2025 Instructions The web based healthcare information assessment affords the opportunity to assess healthcare

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Web-Based Healthcare Information Assessment – 2025

 

Instructions

The web-based healthcare information assessment affords the opportunity to assess healthcare education on the internet. As future professional nurses, it is imperative you provide your clients with appropriate recommendations for credible health information on the internet.

The goal of this assessment is for you to evaluate a website of your choosing (e.g., the American Heart Association the American Diabetes Association or  Web MD, Mayo Clinic) following the HONcode criteria (Health on the Net) available in this module’s Reading and Resources folder.

 Review the HON (Honor of Code) criteria (https://www.healthonnet.org/HONcode/Conduct.html  

 https://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Patients/Visitor/visitor.html ), then select a health-based website to review if it meets the standards of HON Code.  

For additional details, please refer to the Rubric attached below for further instructions!

The Holistic patient Assessment – 2025 Assignment Description Signature Assignment Title The Holistic Patient Assessment Part 1 Choose an

by

Nursing Assignment Help

The Holistic patient Assessment – 2025

Assignment Description

Signature Assignment Title: The Holistic Patient Assessment

Part 1: Choose an adult (over the age of 18) friend or relative and perform a holistic health assessment. Clearly document your holistic health assessment data

Your assessment should include the following parts:

  • Health History
  • Physiological Assessment
  • Psychological Assessment
  • Social Assessment
  • Cultural Assessment
  • Developmental Assessment
  • Spiritual Assessment

Part 2: Interpret the findings in your holistic health assessment data according to pathophysiologic disease states.  

  • Choose one physiologic abnormality and discuss possible pathophysiologic reasons for the abnormality.  
  • Look at the abnormality on a holistic basis.  
  • How does this abnormality impact the other areas of the patient’s life, especially those areas discussed in this course?
  • Discuss the client’s stress and coping mechanisms.  
  • Are they healthy?  
  • What improvements could be made?

Part 3: Create a teaching plan that addresses the client holistically by applying the assessment data you have analyzed.  

  • Describe at least one client goal for each of the categories (physical, psychological, social, cultural, developmental, and spiritual).
  • How will you teach the client about the goal?  
  • How will you evaluate your teaching?  

Part 4: Prepare a PowerPoint presentation for your patient teaching.  

  • You should have at least six slides (one for each type of goal – physical, psychological, social, cultural, developmental, and spiritual), in addition to the title slide, objective slide, and references slide.  
  • Please be sure to have at least one scholarly source in the PPT.

Assignment Expectations:

  • Length: Essay of 1500 words; PP of 12 content slides (and include a title, objective, and reference slides – these do not count towards the required content slides)
  • Structure: PP as noted above. Essay: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. These do not count towards the minimum word count for the essay part of the assignment. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion. 
  • References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of three scholarly sources plus the textbook are required.

Total Point Value of Assignment: 500 points

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations – 2025 Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations – 2025

Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the study in your responses.

Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer‐reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two quantitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

AttachmentsNRS-433V-RS3-ResearchCritiqueGuidelinesPart II.docx
RUBRIC

Attempt Start Date: 27-May-2019 at 12:00:00 AM

Due Date: 02-Jun-2019 at 11:59:59 PM

Maximum Points: 200.0

Rough Draft Research Critique – Quantitative

No of Criteria: 11 Achievement Levels: 5CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentage1: Unsatisfactory0.00 %2: Less Than Satisfactory75.00 %3: Satisfactory83.00 %4: Good94.00 %5: Excellent100.00 %Content75.0     Quantitative Studies5.0Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use quantitative research.Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on quantitative research.N/AN/ATwo articles are presented. Both articles are based on quantitative research.Background of Study10.0Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.Article Support of Nursing Practice15.0Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail is required.A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed.A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support.A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question.Method of Study15.0Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete.A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed.A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity.A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.Results of Study15.0Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies.Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation.Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.Anticipated Outcomes and Outcomes Comparison15.0Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are omitted or are unrealistic. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes is incomplete.Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are partially summarized. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes contains omissions of key information. It is unclear how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare.Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are summarized. Comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes is generally presented. More information is needed to fully establish how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare.Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are discussed. A comparison of research article outcomes to anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity.Anticipated outcomes for the PICOT are thoroughly discussed. A detailed comparison of research article outcomes to the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT is presented. An explanation of how the anticipated outcomes of the PICOT and those of the current research mentioned compare is presented in detail.Organization and Effectiveness15.0     Thesis Development and Purpose5.0Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction5.0Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Format10.0     Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)5.0Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5.0Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.Total Percentage  100

The effect of legal, safety, and regulatory requirements on the human resources process – 2025 Write a 700 to 1 050 word paper that examines the effect of legal safety and regulatory requirements on

by

Nursing Assignment Help

The effect of legal, safety, and regulatory requirements on the human resources process – 2025

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper that examines the effect of legal, safety, and regulatory requirements on the human resources process. Your paper should focus on employee-related regulations established by the United States, such as the Department of Labor, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Department of Homeland Security.

Include your thoughts on the following statement:

  • “Common sense and compassion in the workplace have been replaced by litigation.”

Include at least 3 references.

Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.

Benchmark – Human Experience Across the Health-Illness Continuum – 2025 The benchmark assesses the following competency Benchmark 5 1 Understand the human experience across the health illness continuum Research the

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Benchmark – Human Experience Across the Health-Illness Continuum – 2025

The benchmark assesses the following competency:

Benchmark: 5.1. Understand the human experience across the health-illness continuum.

Research the health-illness continuum and its relevance to patient care. In a 750-1,000 word paper, discuss the relevance of the continuum to patient care and present a perspective of your current state of health in relation to the wellness spectrum. Include the following:

  1. Examine the health-illness continuum and discuss why this perspective is important to consider in relation to health and the human experience when caring for patients.
  2. Reflect on your overall state of health. Discuss what behaviors support or detract from your health and well-being. Explain where you currently fall on the health-illness continuum.
  3. Discuss the options and resources available to you to help you move toward wellness on the health-illness spectrum. Describe how these would assist in moving you toward wellness (managing a chronic disease, recovering from an illness, self-actualization, etc.).

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

RUBRIC IN ATTACHED FILE. USE SCHOLARLY ARTICLES ONLY!!!!!!

Week 6 Assignment: Scholarly Paper Phase 2 – 2025 Scholarly Paper Phase 2 Guidelines and Grading Rubric Updated 1 20 This assignment will be uploaded automatically to Turnitin

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Week 6 Assignment: Scholarly Paper Phase 2 – 2025

Scholarly Paper Phase 2 Guidelines and Grading Rubric

Updated 1/20

This assignment will be uploaded automatically to Turnitin upon submission to verify this is your original work and no parts were copied from another student.

Turnitin is now more closely integrated with Canvas. Overall, you will find Turnitin assignments easier to use, but the steps to submit an assignment have changed somewhat. Directions are as follows:
1. Click the orange “Submit Assignment” button at the top of the page to open the upload window.
2. Click on “Choose File” to select your assignment file you want to upload.
3. Check the box to agree to the Turnitin End-User License Agreement.
4. Click “Submit Assignment.”
5. Your Turnitin report will be visible in the “Grades” section of your course.  

TII image

Please refer to the pages below for more information about these changes.
• Turnitin Submitting a Paper (Links to an external site.) explains how to submit a file.
• Turnitin Assignment Student View (Links to an external site.) lets you submit a paper, then view feedback on the file you have submitted.
• Turnitin Viewing Instructor Feedback (Links to an external site.) helps you view your instructor feedback.

Please contact your instructor if you have any questions.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this assignment is to allow the learner to demonstrate good organization, appropriate resources, and correct APA formatting for preparing a scholarly paper.

COURSE OUTCOMES

This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes (COs).

  • CO3: Demonstrate effective verbal, written, and technological communication using legal and ethical standards for transferring knowledge using success resources provided to Chamberlain students. (PO3)
  • CO4: Integrate critical thinking and judgment in professional decision-making in collaboration with faculty and peers. (PO4)
  • CO5: Apply concepts of professionalism when planning for personal, intellectual, and professional development. (PO5)
  • CO9: Demonstrate accountability for personal and professional development by assessing information and technology competence, implementing plans for upgrading technology skills, and using effective strategies for online student success using resources provided to Chamberlain students. (PO5)

DUE DATE

Submit the assignment by Sunday end of Week 6, 11:59 p.m. MT.

POINTS

This assignment is worth a total of 225 points.

PREPARING THE SCHOLARLY PAPER PHASE 2

  1. Carefully read these instructions and the Rubric.
  2. Download the Week 6 Scholarly Paper Phase 2 Template (Links to an external site.). Use of the assigned template is required. Rename that document as Your Last Name Scholarly Paper Phase 2.docx, for example Smith Scholarly Paper Phase 2. Save it to your own computer or drive in a location where you will be able to retrieve it later.
  3. Type your assignment directly on the saved template using Microsoft Word. The document must be saved as a .docx. Save frequently to prevent loss of your work.
  4. The only resource for your paper is the following assigned article, “Making the case for nursing specialty certification: Promote the profession, advance your career, and improve patient care” (Links to an external site.)
    Note: Logging in to the Chamberlain Library is needed to access this article. Use of the assigned article is required. You must click on the PDF Full Text link on the upper left portion of the page to download the correct version of this required article.
  5. Follow the instructions and specifics on the assigned required template and the rubric. You will demonstrate your scholarly writing abilities as well as APA abilities in references, citations, quotations, and paraphrasing.
  6. See rubric for length limitations for each section and other criteria.
  7. For the Introduction section (see rubric for details),
    1. introduce the assigned paper topic;
    2. explain that the purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of the assigned article;
    3. explain that that the impact of the article contents on your own future practice will be included; and
    4. length must be 50–75 words.
  8. For the Article Summary section (see rubric for details),
    1. clearly summarize the major content of the assigned article using 175–200 words;
    2. content must include main ideas from across the entire article;
    3. specifics should be excellent;
    4. content must be attributed to the correct source; and
    5. instructor feedback from Week 4 Scholarly Paper Phase 1 must be used to revise and improve this section.
  9. For the Impact section,
    1. clearly state how learning from the assigned article will impact your future practice;
    2. length must be 125–150 words;
    3. writing must be concise and clearly relate the assigned article contents to practice;
    4. use first person in this section; and
    5. instructor feedback from Week 4 Scholarly Paper Phase 1 must be used to revise and improve this section.
  10. For the Conclusion,
    1. write a concise summary of main points of the paper;
    2. provide a concluding statement; and
    3. length must be 75–100 words.
  11. Double check your work with the rubric prior to submission.
  12. Note: Assigned Template must be used for this assignment. The Assigned Template has been specially prepared to help you do well on this assignment. See #2 above. 
  13. Note: Assigned Article must be used for this assignment. Failure to do so may result in loss of points and/or Academic Integrity violation investigation.

**Academic Integrity**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Note: Please use your browser’s File menu to save or print this page.

dq8Case Study, Chapter 14, Medical Errors: An Ongoing Threat to Quality Health Care – 2025 A nurse manager is reviewing occurrence reports of medical errors over the last six months The nurse manager knows that

by

Nursing Assignment Help

dq8Case Study, Chapter 14, Medical Errors: An Ongoing Threat to Quality Health Care – 2025

A nurse manager is reviewing occurrence reports of medical errors over the last six months. The nurse manager knows that medical errors are not the only indicator of quality of care. They are, however, a pervasive problem in the current health care system and one of the greatest threats to quality health care. The nurse manager is putting together a list of possible solutions to decrease the number of occurrences of medication errors.

1. Recognizing that health care errors affect at least one in every 10 patients around the world, the World Health Organization’s World Alliance for Patient Safety and the Collaborating Centre identified priority program areas related to patient safety. What are the patient safety program areas the nurse manager should consider for implementation?

2. Describe the Joint Commission 2017 National Patient Safety Goals for Hospitals.

3. Discuss the Institute of Medicine’s four-pronged approach to reducing medical mistakes? 

Please use the numbers of questions in the paper. 

Benchmark – Outcome and Process Measures – 2025 In a 1 000 1 250 word paper consider the outcome and process measures that can

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Benchmark – Outcome and Process Measures – 2025

  

In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, consider the outcome and process measures that can be used for CQI. Include the following in your essay:

1. At least two process measures that can be used for CQI.

2. At least one outcome measure that can be used for CQI.

3. A description of why each measure was chosen.

4. An explanation of how data would be collected for each (how each will be measured).

5. An explanation of how success would be determined.

6. One or two data-driven, cost-effective solutions to this challenge.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.

NUR-674-D5J2 – 2025 Write a journal entry of 750 1 500 words on the subject of authority including the

by

Nursing Assignment Help

NUR-674-D5J2 – 2025

 

Write a journal entry of 750-1,500 words on the subject of authority, including the following:

 

Servant Leadership From a Christian Perspective: The Issue of Authority

  1. Practicum Activities Reflection: Provide observations and thoughts on the activities in your practicum setting during Topics 3-4.
  2. Application of Leadership: Explain your place of influence in your professional life.
  3. Practicum Project Preparation: Describe the goals you have set for your practicum project. 
  4. Leadership Video Reflection: Reflect on at least two things you learned from the “Servant Leadership – Issue of Authority” video.

Use the “Leadership Journal Template” to complete this assignment.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. 

Additional Notes:

Topic 3 objectives was on: 

 

  1. Explain the purpose of conducting an organizational needs assessment.
  2. Identify tools used for conducting a needs assessment.
  3. Describe methods to perform a needs assessment.

 Topic 4 objectives was on:

  1. Compare power and authority from secular and biblical perspectives.
  2. Compare the issue of authority in the servant leadership paradigm to the secular view of power.
  3. Align project goals with organizational needs.

My practicum project is on:Concept-based and evidence based learning strategies in creating nurse leaders.   

 
I am mentoring with The Director of the Emergency room
The paper must be done on the attach template Please Identify each question being asked.
 

Please remember I am a nurse in the emergency room at a hospital.  I am working with the director of the emergency room

pharmacology – 2025 A graduate school nurse has to prepare a presentation for a freshman class of nursing students on anxiolytic

by

Nursing Assignment Help

pharmacology – 2025

 

A graduate school nurse has to prepare a presentation for a freshman class of nursing students on anxiolytic and hypnotic agents. The learning objectives include a review of the states that are affected by anxiolytic and hypnotic agents and key nursing considerations for patients receiving these medications. (Learning Objectives 1, 2, and 5)

a.What are the definitions of the states affected by anxiolytic or hypnotic agents?

b.What are the key nursing implementation considerations for a patient receiving a benzodiazepine?

c.What should the nurse teach the students about the indications for zaleplon (Sonata) and zolpidem (Ambien)?

Case Study, Chapter 23, Antiseizure Agents

A patient had a tonic–clonic seizure and has been started on a phenytoin medication. The patient tells the nurse he is very upset about not being able to drive and has several questions about epilepsy. (Learning Objectives 1, 2, and 5)

a.What should be included in the patient teaching about the classification of generalized seizures?

a.How does phenytoin work?

c.What are the key implementation and rationale considerations for this patient who is receiving medication to treat generalized seizures?

Case Study, Chapter 26, Narcotics, Narcotic Antagonists, and Antimigraine Agents

A new graduate RN has been assigned to a medical–surgical unit. The new graduate RN is in the week of nursing orientation and is administering medications. The RN has to administer an antimigraine medication to an adult patient, a narcotic to an older adult in acute pain, and a narcotic antagonist to a third patient. (Learning Objectives 1, 2, 3, and 5)

a.What is the gate control theory of pain, and how does this block pain for a patient?

b.What are the key lifespan considerations for an older adult when administering narcotics?

c.What are the key nursing implementation considerations for a patient receiving a narcotic antagonist?

d.What are the key lifespan considerations for an adult when administering antimigraine medication?

Case Study, Chapter 30, Adrenergic Agonists

A patient is experiencing serious ventricular arrhythmias and shock following a heart transplant. The physician has ordered isoproterenol and dopamine to be administered to the patient. (Learning Objectives 2, 4, and 5)

a.What is the therapeutic action for isoproterenol?

b.What are the adverse effects of isoproterenol?

c.What is the therapeutic action for dopamine?

d.What are the adverse effects of dopamine?

e.What are the key nursing implementation considerations for patients receiving an adrenergic agent?

Case Study, Chapter 36, Adrenocortical Agents

A second-year nursing student has to prepare medication cards for clinical on adrenocortical agents. The specific medication cards that have to be prepared are for prednisone (Deltasone) and fludrocortisone (Florinef). Additionally, the student nurse has to prepare a patient teaching plan for mineralocorticoids. (Learning Objectives 1, 2, 4, and 5)

a.What are the physiological effects of the adrenocortical agents?

b.What are the key nursing implementation teaching points that need to be reviewed with a patient receiving an adrenocortical agent?

c.What are the most common adverse reactions for fludrocortisone (Florinef)?

d.What are the indications for prednisone (Deltasone)?

Case Study, Chapter 38, Agents to Control Blood Glucose Levels

A diabetes registered nurse educator is preparing an in-service presentation for student nurses on agents to control blood glucose levels for diabetes mellitus. The in-service will include a brief review of the pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus. Drugs to be included in the presentation will include insulin, chlorpropamide (Diabinese), glyburide (Micronase), and metformin (Glucophage). (Learning Objectives 1, 4, and 5)

a.What alterations in metabolic pathways and changes to basement membranes occur with diabetes mellitus?

b.What are the key nursing implementation considerations for patients taking insulin?

c.What are the indications for chlorpropamide (Diabinese)?

d.What are the most common adverse effects of glyburide (Micronase)?

e.What are the therapeutic actions for metformin (Glucophage)?

f.What are the lifespan considerations for children who use antidiabetic agents?