Schizophrenia, Other Psychotic Disorders, – 2025 A patient presents to your primary care office today with chief complaint

Nursing Assignment Help

Schizophrenia, Other Psychotic Disorders, – 2025

  

: A patient presents to your primary care office today with chief complaint of insomnia. Patient is 75 YO with PMH of DM, HTN, and MDD. Her husband of 41 years passed away 10 months ago. Since then, she states her depression has gotten worse as well as her sleep habits. The patient has no previous history of depression prior to her husband’s death. She is awake, alert, and oriented x3. Patient normally sees PCP once or twice a year. Patient denies any suicidal ideations. Patient arrived at the office today by private vehicle. Patient currently takes the following medications: 

  • Metformin 500mg BID 
  • Januvia 100mg daily 
  • Losartan 100mg daily 
  • HCTZ 25mg daily 
  • Sertraline 100mg daily 

Current weight: 88 kg

Current height: 64 inches

Temp: 98.6 degrees F

BP: 132/86 

  • List three questions you might ask the patient if she      were in your office. Provide a rationale for why you might ask these      questions. 
  • Identify people in the patient’s life you would need to      speak to or get feedback from to further assess the patient’s situation.      Include specific questions you might ask these people and why. 
  • Explain what, if any, physical exams, and diagnostic      tests would be appropriate for the patient and how the results would be      used. 
  • List a differential diagnosis for the patient. Identify      the one that you think is most likely and explain why. 
  • List two pharmacologic agents and their dosing that      would be appropriate for the patient’s antidepressant therapy based on      pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. From a mechanism of action      perspective, provide a rationale for why you might choose one agent over      the other. 
  • For the drug therapy you select, identify any      contraindications to use or alterations in dosing that may need to be      considered based on the client’s ethnicity. Discuss why the      contraindication/alteration you identify exists. That is, what would be      problematic with the use of this drug in individuals of other ethnicities?
  • indicate any therapeutic changes that you might make      based on possible outcomes that may happen given your treatment options      chosen. 

Paper – 2025 Prepare this assignment as a 1 500 1 750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments

Nursing Assignment Help

Paper – 2025

 

Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.

PICOT Question 

Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.

The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Research Critiques

In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.

The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.

Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.

General Requirements

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance

Teacher’ s feedback

 these are quantitative studies. Please complete a qualitative critique next week- using 2 qualitative studies. This is a worksheet, provided for you to gather your thoughts. The assignment is an APA paper. Please see the templates that I provided for your success in your welcome message in the individual forum and announcements. Also, your book is required for all assignments in this class- scholarly support takes a summary and makes it into a critique. Please reach out for questions.

  with experimental research there is a control with dependent and independent variables. The researchers seek to identify, if this, then that. With non-experimental, the researchers do not manipulate anything- instead they are on a data search. They want to describe something, correlate one entity to another to increase their knowledge and understanding. Thanks for your post.

Research Assignment – 2025 Read Chapter 1 Identifying a Research Topic Read Chapter 2 Reviewing the Literature Textbook Ruth M Tappen 2015 Nursing Research Advanced

Nursing Assignment Help

Research Assignment – 2025

 Read: Chapter 1 Identifying a Research Topic

Read: Chapter 2 Reviewing the Literature

Textbook: Ruth M. Tappen. (2015). Nursing Research. Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice. (2nd ed.). ISBN-13: 9781284048308. ISBN-10: 1284048306. Publisher: Jones & Bartlett Learning

 Based on your readings from Chapters one and two from your course text. What type of research topic would be of interest to you? Elaborate on factors that motivated you and what are you seeking?

The Topic I select is Depression. please make your answer is according to the topic I selected. Also for this assignment I’m asking for 250 words. APA edition 7. Plagarism free. I’m asking also to use the textbook. Due date: January 13 @ 9:00pm. Please be on time. 

Medicine And Surgery 1 – 2025 The assessment portion of the nursing process is where the nurse will collect data about the patient

Nursing Assignment Help

Medicine And Surgery 1 – 2025

 

The assessment portion of the nursing process is where the nurse will collect data about the patient. This information will encompass physical findings, psychological, cultural, social, family, and nursing histories as well as accessing the medical record and obtaining diagnostic test results. A nurse should not implement interventions until a complete assessment has been done. Discuss.

Students will post to initial discussion before Wednesday January 13, 2021 @ 11:59 pm

Note: APA 7th edition is required.

Not less than 250 words

Analyze The Evidence Summary Of The Selected Quantitative Research Study To Address The Following. – 2025 Download the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool and the Johns Hopkins Individual

Nursing Assignment Help

Analyze The Evidence Summary Of The Selected Quantitative Research Study To Address The Following. – 2025

Download the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool and the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool located in Student Resource Center located in “Project & Practicum Resources.”

Select one of the eight practice problems that burden the overall health of the United States. Conduct a library search for one quantitative research study addressing this problem. Appraise the quantitative research study using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool. My practice problem is Diabetes Mellitus

After appraising and determining the Level of Evidence and Grade of Quality for your selected quantitative study, summarize your findings. Transfer your findings to the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool. Complete each column including specific details about the quantitative study.

Include your completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool and your quantitative research study as an attachment with your initial post. Also, include a permalink for your selected quantitative research study with your initial discussion post. Confirm the link allows access to the full-text study article. Our faculty team will review both your research study and Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool and provide guidance.

Analyze the evidence summary of the selected quantitative research study to address the following.

1-Does the research design answer the research question? Explain your rationale.

2-Were the study sample participants representative? Why or why not?

3-Compare and contrast the study limitations in this study.

4-Based on this evidence summary, would you consider this quantitative research study as support for your selected practice problem? Explain your rationale.

Please review the Graduate Discussion Grading Guidelines and Rubric (Links to an external site.) for complete discussion requirements.

Group Processes And Stages Of Formation – 2025 Explain the group s processes and stage of formation Explain curative factors that occurred in the group Include how these

Nursing Assignment Help

Group Processes And Stages Of Formation – 2025

 

Explain the group’s processes and stage of formation.
Explain curative factors that occurred in the group. Include how these factors might impact client progress.
Explain intragroup conflict that occurred and recommend strategies for  managing the conflict. Support your recommendations with evidence-based  literature NURS 6650 Group Processes and Stages of Formation Essay
 

This is the video
(2011). Group Therapy: A Live Demonstration [Video file]. Psychotherapy.net. Retrieved January 12, 2021, from Kanopy.

Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

​The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, 5th Edition by  Yalom, Irvin D. ; Leszcz, Molyn. Copyright 2005 by Hachette Books Group.  Reprinted by permission of Hachette Books Group via the Copyright  Clearance Center.

Chapter 5, “The Therapist: Basic Tasks” (pp. 117–140)

Chapter 8, “The Selection of Clients” (pp. 231–258)

Chapter 9, “The Composition of Therapy Groups” (pp. 259–280)

Crane-Okada, R. (2012). The concept of presence in group  psychotherapy: An operational definition. Perspectives in Psychiatric  Care, 48(3), 156–164. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6163.2011.00320.x

Healthcare Ethics – 2025 This week students will complete an APA paper to address the following

Nursing Assignment Help

Healthcare Ethics – 2025

 

This week students will complete an APA paper to address the following case study.

Mr. Corley Case Study:

Walter and Sheila Corley were married on January 20, 1984.   At the time, they lived in Texarkana, Arkansas.   Their son Jerry was born in July 1985.   Later that year, the Corleys separated and were divorced.   Sometime thereafter, the Corleys reconciled and resumed living together, holding themselves out to others as a married couple.   In February 1988, the Corleys moved to Mr. Corley’s hometown of Ferriday, Louisiana.   The Corleys were remarried in December 1988.

Neurofibromatosis, a disease of the peripheral nerves of the body, is a condition marked by the presence of numerous neurofibromas, which are tumors or growths arising from the Schwann cells which form the covering membrane or sheath of a nerve fiber.   Persons with neurofibromatosis frequently have café au lait spots of varying sizes on their bodies as well.   In addition, people afflicted with neurofibromatosis experience a significantly increased risk of developing cancer.

In 1978, Mr. Corley was diagnosed with neurofibromatosis and had four neurofibromas removed from his head, arm, hip and leg by a physician in Texarkana.   Thereafter, a few months prior to his return to Louisiana in 1988, Mr.  Corley, who had no other known health problems, began experiencing low back pain.

On February 11, 1988, Mr. Corley sought medical treatment from Dr. Maurice Gremillion, a family practitioner in Ferriday.   On that date, Mr. Corley complained that he had been experiencing low back pain and abdominal discomfort for approximately four months.   He also noted that he had intermittent right shoulder pain and trouble sleeping.   At Mr. Corley’s request, Dr. Gremillion ordered a total work-up which included x-rays of the lower spine, chest, kidneys and gall bladder, as well as an upper GI series.   Dr. Gremillion also prescribed Flexeril, a muscle relaxer, and Anaprox, an anti-inflammatory pain medication.   Dr. Gremillion, feeling that Mr. Corley should be seen by a specialist, then gave him a written referral to E.A. Conway Medical Center in Monroe for an orthopedic evaluation.

E.A. Conway, which is part of the L.S.U. system, is a teaching facility staffed by permanent, full-time physicians as well as by doctors who are employed on a temporary, rotating basis as interns and residents following their graduation from medical school.   The general operating procedure of E.A. Conway at the time of Mr. Corley’s presentment was that all new patients, even those who have referrals to a specific service or department, first go through the emergency room.   At that time, a patient is charted and evaluated by an emergency room physician.   From there, the patient is either treated or referred to a specific clinic for further follow-up.   In most cases, patients see different doctors each time they report to the hospital or one of its clinics.

On March 2, 1988, Mr. Corley, accompanied by Sheila Corley, reported to the E.A. Conway Emergency Room. The Corleys presented admitting personnel with all of Mr. Corley’s records from Dr. Gremillion, including the x-rays and other test reports.   Dr. Bruce Fuller, an emergency room physician, took a history from Mr. Corley and reviewed Dr. Gremillion’s notes and the x-ray reports.   He also conducted a routine physical examination and had x-rays made of Mr. Corley’s low back.   Notwithstanding the presence of several growths and café au lait spots on Mr. Corley’s back and torso, Dr. Fuller was unaware that his patient had neurofibromatosis.

Dr. Fuller found everything to be within normal limits and it was his impression that Mr. Corley was suffering from low back pain based on minimal subjective complaints of pain.   Dr. Fuller continued Mr. Corley on the medication prescribed by Dr. Gremillion and made an appointment for him with the Orthopedic Clinic on March 16, 1988.

On that date, Mr. Corley was seen in the Orthopedic Clinic by fourth year resident McIntyre Bridges.   Dr. Bridges does not recall looking at or reading the x-rays or reports from Mr. Corley’s previous examinations.   Dr. Bridges conducted a physical exam, which was normal, and started Mr. Corley on a conservative course of treatment for low back pain.   Dr. Bridges’ notes from this date indicate his awareness of Mr. Corley’s neurofibromatosis.

Mr. Corley was next seen on April 20, 1988 by Dr. David Mehta.   At the time, Dr. Mehta was doing a surgical internship and was rotating through the Orthopedic Department.   Dr. Mehta’s notes reflect that his physical exam of Mr. Corley was normal, but that he felt that Mr. Corley had a posture problem and referred him to physical therapy for correction of his posture.   Again, the notes do not reflect whether Dr. Mehta reviewed any of Mr. Corley’s previous medical records, x-rays or reports.

On September 14, 1988, Mr. Corley was seen by fourth year surgical resident Keith White.   On that date, Mr. Corley noted that his pain had worsened and was occasionally affecting his walking.   Dr. White’s examination yielded no objective findings of low back pain, but he did notice several café au lait spots indicative of neurofibromatosis so he ordered a CT scan of Mr. Corley’s low back to rule out any neurofibroma changes in the nerve roots.   Dr. Ellis, a radiologist at E.A. Conway, interpreted the CT scan as showing arthritis consistent with fibrosis or spinal stenosis and possible edema of the right L-5 nerve root, which, according to Dr. White, may or may not have been the cause of Mr. Corley’s back pain.   As with Drs. Bridges and Mehta, Dr. White did not review any of the previous medical records, x-rays or reports.   Mr. Corley’s last visit to E.A. Conway was September 21, 1988.   On that date, Dr. White reviewed the results of the CT scan with Mr. Corley, continued him on an anti-inflammatory drug and encouraged him to continue his back exercises.   Dr. White instructed Mr. Corley to return to the clinic in three months.

Thereafter, on October 26, 1988, Mr. Corley, plagued by constant back pain and beginning to experience difficulty breathing, consulted Dr. Rick Maxwell, a chiropractor, who did a full spinal x-ray which revealed a markedly diminished right lung area.   Dr. Maxwell sent Mr. Corley to his father, also a chiropractor, who confirmed that there was a potential problem with Mr. Corley’s right lung and recommended that he see a pulmonary specialist.

On October 31, 1988, Mr. Corley presented to Dr. Gremillion complaining of chest congestion and shortness of breath.   Dr. Gremillion diagnosed him with bronchitis and implemented treatment accordingly.   Mr. Corley returned to Dr. Gremillion on November 14, 1988 with complaints of shortness of breath and marked weight loss.   Subsequent diagnostic testing confirmed the presence of a very large mass in Mr. Corley’s right chest.

Prior to his death on January 23, 1990, Mr. Corley received radiation and chemotherapy treatment at LSU Medical Center in Shreveport.

Corley v. State Department of Health Hospitals. http://caselaw.findlaw.com/la-court-of-appeal/1071352.html

Student should address the following questions regarding this case in an APA paper

  1. What are the facts of the case? This should include: what do we need to know, who is involved in the situation, where does the ethical situation take place, and when does it occur?
  2. What is the precise ethical issue in regards to autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, fidelity, and justice?
  3. Identify the major principles, rules, and values of the case.  Values are sets of beliefs about good and bad, right and wrong, and about many other aspects of living and interacting in the society with others. A principle is a personal rule that governs personal behavior. A rule is generally imposed by a figure of authority, and used to guide and govern people.
  4. Is there legal ground for this case, if so what? Who is at fault? What legal action should be taken?
  5. Are there alternatives to the actions completed in this case by both the patient and healthcare facility? Do you feel the physicians were following hospital protocol?
  6. If you were a member of the ethics committee at this facility, what actions or changes would you recommend changing? Why?

For the case study, an APA formatted paper should be used, and needs to include a title page, level headings, references and citations. This assignment should include at least 2 references and should be at least five pages in length. Students should address the proposed questions providing ample detail, examples, and additional support.

Assignment Expectations:  

  • Length:
    • answers must thoroughly address each question in a clear, concise manner; complete answers will likely take 5-6 pages
  • Structure:
    • reference page required
    • address each question in a numbered list
  • References:
    • Two references required
  • Format:
    • save your assignment as a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx), Open Office (.odt) or rich text format (.rtf) file type

NRS 493 -0503 Professional Capstone – 2025 Throughout the RN to BSN program students are required to participate in scholarly activities outside of clinical

Nursing Assignment Help

NRS 493 -0503 Professional Capstone – 2025

Throughout the RN-to-BSN program, students are required to participate in scholarly activities outside of clinical practice or professional practice. Examples of scholarly activities include attending conferences, seminars, journal club, grand rounds, morbidity and mortality meetings, interdisciplinary committees, quality improvement committees, and any other opportunities available at your site, within your community, or nationally.

You are required to post at least one documented scholarly activity by the end of this course. In addition to this submission, you are required to be involved and contribute to interdisciplinary initiatives on a regular basis.

Submit, by way of this assignment, a summary report of the scholarly activity, including who, what, where, when, and any relevant take-home points. Include the appropriate program competencies associated with the scholarly activity as well as future professional goals related to this activity. You may use the “Scholarly Activity Summary” resource to help guide this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

Microbiology – 2025 You are about to be sent to a remote area by WHO where you will be working with infectious

Nursing Assignment Help

Microbiology – 2025

 You are about to be sent to a remote area by WHO where you will be working with infectious diseases caused by a variety of microorganisms. You will be using what you know about the chemistry underlying biological processes in microbes and infections to solve the case on Rabbit Island. What will you need to know? What resources would you use to find more information 

Written Assignment In APA Format – 2025 Emotional Intelligence Worksheet 1 Think back on time you were angry or upset about something at the clinical site How

Nursing Assignment Help

Written Assignment In APA Format – 2025

  

Emotional Intelligence Worksheet

1. Think back on time you were angry or upset about something at the clinical site. How did you react?

2. Describe a time when understanding someone else’s perspective helped you understand them better.

3. What motivates you when you have a job to do that you may not particularly enjoy doing?