1) Minimum 24  Slides with speaker notes – Avoid using large and unnecessary images. Use the slides to provide substantial and objective information

              Part 1: Minimum 8 Slides with speaker notes

              Part 2: minimum 8 Slides with speaker notes

              Part 3: minimum 8 Slides with speaker notes 

Name each slide according to each point of the question (Remember that you must address each number and letter of the points requested):

1. Case 

2. Differential diagnoses 

3. Labs or tests

4. Treatment pharmacology

5. Outcomes 

6. Patient teaching 

Submit 1 document per part

2)¨******APA norms

          All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraphs

          Dont write in the first person 

          Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph

         Submit 1 document per part

3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks) 

********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)

4) Minimum 5 references per part not older than 5 years

5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question. Start your answer on the same line, not the next

Example:

Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX

Q 2. Health is XXXX

6) You must name the files according to the part you are answering: 

Example:

Part 1.doc 

Part 2.doc 

__________________________________________________________________________________

Part 1:  Hepatitis B Infection 

You must create a case and develop the following topics (MANDATORY):

1. Presents the case including:

Male

67 years old

a. CC

b. HPI

c. Hx

d. ROS 

e. PE findings concisely

2 List possible  3 differential diagnoses you must include: 

a. supporting criteria

b. excluding criteria.

3. Labs or tests typically ordered concerning this condition, and explain them.

a. Show the results that should do NP expect to see with this diagnosis

4.  Explain goal treatment pharmacology

a. List specific drugs, starting doses, dose ranges

b. Precautions to keep in mind when prescribing these drugs.

5 What are the outcomes expected or unexpected for this specific condition? 

a. What patient outcomes will trigger a referral?

6 Provide patient teaching materials specific to their condition 

Part 2:  Pernicious anemia

You must create a case and develop the following topics (MANDATORY):

1. Presents the case including:

Female

62 years old

a. CC

b. HPI

c. Hx

d. ROS 

e. PE findings concisely

2 List possible  3 differential diagnoses you must include: 

 a. supporting criteria

b. excluding criteria.

3. Labs or tests typically ordered concerning this condition, and explain them.

 a. Show the results that should do NP expect to see with this diagnosis

4.  Explain goal treatment pharmacology

 a. List specific drugs, starting doses, dose ranges

 b. Precautions to keep in mind when prescribing these drugs.

5 What are the outcomes expected or unexpected for this specific condition? 

 a. What patient outcomes will trigger a referral?

6 Provide patient teaching materials specific to their condition 

Part 3:  Hyperthiroidism

You must create a case and develop the following topics (MANDATORY):

1. Presents the case including:

Male

65 years old

a. CC

b. HPI

c. Hx

d. ROS 

e. PE findings concisely

2 List possible  3 differential diagnoses you must include: 

a. supporting criteria

b. excluding criteria.

3. Labs or tests typically ordered concerning this condition, and explain them.

 a. Show the results that should do NP expect to see with this diagnosis

4.  Explain goal treatment pharmacology

 a. List specific drugs, starting doses, dose ranges

 b. Precautions to keep in mind when prescribing these drugs.

5 What are the outcomes expected or unexpected for this specific condition? 

a. What patient outcomes will trigger a referral?

6 Provide patient teaching materials specific to their condition 

Work #1:

Actual work where 2 students given their post on this:

In 500 words or more, compare DNS failover and cloud failover. 

Use at least three sources. Use the Research Databases available from the Danforth Library not Google. Include at least 3 quotes from your sources enclosed in quotation marks and cited in-line by reference to your reference list.  Example: “words you copied” (citation) These quotes should be one full sentence not altered or paraphrased. Cite your sources using APA format. Use the quotes in your paragaphs.  Stand alone quotes will not count toward the 3 required quotes.

Copying without attribution or the use of spinbot or other word substitution software will result in a grade of 0. 

Write in essay format not in bulleted, numbered or other list format. 

Reply to two classmates’ posting in a paragraph of at least five sentences by asking questions, reflecting on your own experience, challenging assumptions, pointing out something new you learned, offering suggestions. These peer responses are not ‘attaboys’.  

It is important that you use your own words, that you cite your sources, that you comply with the instructions regarding length of your post and that you reply to two classmates in a substantive way (not ‘nice post’ or the like).  Your goal is to help your colleagues write better. Do not use spinbot or other word replacement software. It usually results in nonsense and is not a good way to learn anything. . I will not spend a lot of my time trying to decipher nonsense. Proof read your work or have it edited. Find something interesting and/or relevant to your work to write about.  

Work #2:

1) Please describe the weighted average cost of capital.  How do firms use the weighted average cost of capital for decision making?

2) How are the costs of debt and equity calculated?   

Please find the two attachments. 

  

Using the practice problem you selected in Week 1, continue your appraisal of the evidence by analyzing two systematic reviews. Conduct a library search for two systematic reviews addressing this problem. Appraise the two systematic reviews using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool.

After appraising and determining the Level of Evidence and Grade of Quality for your selected systematic reviews, summarize your findings on the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.

Include your completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool that includes your two systematic reviews as an attachment with your initial post. Also, include PDF versions of your selected two systematic reviews with your initial discussion post. Our faculty team will review both your two systematic reviews and Include your completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.

Analyze the evidence summary of the two systematic reviews to address the following.

• Does the systematic review answer the research question? Explain your rationale.
• Was the search comprehensive and reproducible?
• Did each systematic review include a section addressing limitations and how they were addressed?
• Based on this evidence summary, would you consider either or both of these systematic reviews as support for your selected practice problem? Explain your rationale.

THIS ASSIGNMENT IS RELATED TO THE QUALITATIVE REPORT THAT WAS DONE

Please do the following in its entirety: 

Answer all question please. 

Please  sure to use a cover sheet and please submit a reference page with  your assignment. Late assignments will not be accepted. NO EXCEPTIONS PLEASE!!!!

1.Apatient is having cardiac enzymes drawn to rule out a Myocardial Infarction.

  a) What are the clinical indication and nursing implications for the following enzymes and their importance as a marker for Myocardial Infarction?

    CK 

    CK-MB 

     Myoglobin and Troponin 1.

 

2.A patient has chest pains and is worried of having a second Myocardial Infarction.

     a) What are the discriminating differences between chest pains from angina pectoris  versus the pain associated with Myocardial Infarction.

Reflect upon the selected national practice problem in Week 1 to address the following.

• From a local perspective, how does the practice problem impact nurses, nursing care, healthcare organizations, and the quality of care being provided?
• Identify the local key stakeholders related to the selected practice problem.
• Describe one approach used at your unique setting to address this problem. From your perspective, is this intervention effective in addressing the problem? Why or why not? If this practice problem is not addressed at your workplace, propose an intervention that could be implemented on a local scale to address the problem.