Topic: The Impact of Health Care Negligence

Write at least 2,000 words and use at least 8 sources on the above topic. This topic must be related to do with the medical field or nursing profession. This essay must be argumentative, so you will need to take a stand on something or make an argument for or against an issue. 

Books to use on this project

Aoki, N., Uda, K., & Ohta, Sachiko. (2008). Impact of miscommunication in medical dispute cases in Japan. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(5), 358-362.

Kessler, D. P. (2011). Evaluating the medical malpractice system and options for reform. Publisher. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(2), 93–110.

Mamdani, B. (2004). Medical malpractice. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 1(2), 57-58. https://ijme.in/articles/medical-malpractice/

Pandit, M. S., & Pandit, S. (2009). Medical negligence: Coverage of the profession, duties, ethics, caselaw, and enlightened defense – A legal perspective. Indian Journal of Urology, 25(3), 372-378. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.56206

Pienaar, L. (2016). Investigating the reasons behind the increase in medical negligence claims. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal. https://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a1101

Rai, J. J., Acharya, V., & Dave, D. (2013). Knowledge and awareness among interns and residents about medical law and negligence in a medical college in Vadodara. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, 3(4), 3-38

Shaikh, M. M. M., Barot, D., Trivedi, J., & Bhise, R. S. (2020). Attitude and knowledge of medical negligence among the general population of Ahmedabad city, Gujarat. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 14(3), 2069-2074.

Thomas, J. (2009). Medical records and issues in negligence. Indian Journal of Urology, 25(3), 384-388. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.56208

You can add any relevant article related to this topic

Requirements:

Abstract

Background

Literature Review

Analysis

Conclusion

Recommendation

Note

You will be submitting the literature review section of your final paper for feedback. There is no explicit word count for this exercise, but you will need to fully develop and explain themes in your research that will provide background information for your topic.

Remember that you are not writing about each of your sources separately. You are not focusing on each individual source. Instead, you are focusing on the themes and patterns in the research you have gathered that provide background information on your topic. 

Unlike the annotated bibliography, you are not only allowed but encouraged to use quotes or paraphrase your sources. There should be in-text citations in your writing. 

Even though your focus is to provide background information to your reader and this section is largely informative, you want to make sure that the sources do not speak for you. Paraphrasing and using quotes is absolutely appropriate, but please make sure that you are relying mostly on your own interpretation of the information. Most of your writing should still be your own and not totally dependent on your sources. 

APA formatting

cover page

abstract

reference page with sources in APA formatting

Times New Roman, 12 point font

double-spacing

at least 2,000 words

at least 8 sources

topic should be related to the medical field or nursing profession

NO PLAGIARISM

 

Public Service Announcement (110 points)

Review Health Requirements and Recommendations for Travelers to Saudi Arabia for Hajj and Umrah.

Then, create a Public Service Announcement (PSA) that discusses vaccination policies and recommendations for religious pilgrims entering the Kingdom. The PSA should be in the form of a brochure that will be distributed globally to relevant populations.

Be sure to discuss the following:

• The goals of the vaccination policy;
• Requirements and how to comply with the policy;
• Information for frequently asked questions dealing with prevention, barriers, and other challenges that might arise; and
• Any penalties for failure to follow the policy.

Your brochure should meet the following structural requirements:

• Two-page Brochure that includes all elements detailed above.
• Conforms to Saudi Electronic University and APA writing standards; be sure to cite any statistics or other information, as appropriate.
• Refer to this video for an example of how to create a brochure in Word:How to Create a Tri-Fold Brochure Using Microsoft Word Templates.

 

Read the instructions carefully and make sure that you review the rubrics before submitting an assignment. 

Create a PowerPoint Presentation as a group on the following topic:- 

Sports classes should become mandatory for everybody. 

–  PowerPoint Presentation
.  Each group has three members and each one of you will present your part.  Make sure that you type all of your members’ names on the first slide. Use in-text citations following an APA 7th edition format. 

– The PowerPoint (PPT) should not have complete sentences. Use bullets.

– Presentation should be clear in speech and convincing.

-Include pictures and a video (60 Sec)  

– Reference page should be included with a minimum of five references.

Attached is the essay and the document with the rubrics.

PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW

ZERO PLAGIARISM

4 REFERENCES

Develop effective documentation skills for group therapy sessions *

Develop diagnoses for clients receiving group psychotherapy *

Evaluate the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for groups *

Analyze legal and ethical implications of counseling clients with psychiatric disorders *

* The Assignment related to this Learning Objective is introduced this week and submitted in Week 10.

Select two clients you observed or counseled this week during a group therapy session. Note: The two clients you select must have attended the same group session.

Then, in your Practicum Journal, address the following:

Using the Group Therapy Progress Note in this week’s Learning Resources, document the group session.

Describe each client (without violating HIPAA regulations), and identify any pertinent history or medical information, including prescribed medications.

Using the DSM-5, explain and justify your diagnosis for each client.

Explain whether cognitive behavioral therapy would be effective with this group. Include expected outcomes based on this therapeutic approach.

Explain any legal and/or ethical implications related to counseling each client.

Support your approach with evidence-based literature.

Overview: All students will read the following HPE case study related to discerning between research and non-research during program implementation. There are many blurred lines between research and evaluation, so careful consideration of research and non-research activity is essential to ensure ethical practices are carried out at the onset of the program implementation and evaluation process.

Case Study: The CDC funded 5 health departments to develop programs to provide HIV prevention and referral services to HIV-infected persons. The project objectives included increasing the proportion of HIV-infected persons who know their HIV serostatus as early as possible after infection, providing HIV prevention services to infected persons to reduce the risk of transmission to others, and assisting HIV-infected persons in accessing medical and other needed services. Grantees were encouraged to tailor their interventions to local circumstances, and the funding supported local evaluations of the effectiveness of the interventions in each site.

The grantees provided an array of services to a mix of target populations based on their location. The CDC’s perspective was that the primary intent of the program was to provide services targeted to local community needs, and the primary intent of the evaluations was to improve those services. Thus, the project was deemed to represent non-research by the CDC. However, it was anticipated that, as a secondary benefit, the projects also would provide information—or lessons learned—that might be useful elsewhere.

Although the CDC did not consider the evaluation component of the program to constitute research, some participating health departments differed in this assessment and sought institutional review board (IRB) oversight. At sites where local IRB review was invoked, implementation was delayed up to 1 year. Confusion over whether the program constituted human subjects research resulted in the loss of formative pilot data at 1 site when a local IRB determined that appropriate approvals were not in place. Also read: HIV Rates in Black Men

Assignment: After reading the case study, write a discussion that addresses the following:

· What are the potential ethical considerations in this scenario? What are the main risks for participants in the program?

· Explain the unintended consequences that may occur from the participants’ perspective if the evaluation of the program is deemed research and informed consent is obtained? How might this change impact the participants’ behaviors, attitudes, and/or trust in the program?

· What are the unintended consequences of labeling this evaluation as non-research? How might this impact the program or future programming?

· Which entity was correct in their assessment of the evaluation’s research status (i.e. was this research or non-research)?