• Submit your 20–25-page final capstone project that synthesizes the work you completed in the previous four assessments

  Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

• Assessment Instructions
• Instructions
  Note: The assessments in this course are sequenced in such a way as to help you build specific skills that you will use throughout your program. Complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
  For your final capstone project submission you will synthesize the work you completed in the previous four assessments. Please make sure that you have made relevant revisions as suggested by your instructor, as well as relevant additions that you uncovered during your practicum experience. The only brand-new content that you will need to create for this assessment is an Abstract and an Introduction.
  This final submission will be graded using the seven program outcomes (POs) for the Master’s of Science in Nursing program. As a reminder they are:
  
  1. Lead organizational change to improve the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.
  2. Evaluate the best available evidence for use in clinical and organizational decision making.
  3. Apply quality improvement methods to impact patient, population, and systems outcomes.
  4. Design patient- and population-centered care to improve health outcomes.
  5. Integrate interprofessional care to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost of care.
  6. Evaluate the ability of existing and emerging information, communication, and health care technologies to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost of care.
  7. Defend health policy that improves the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.
  8. In addition, you will be assessed on how well you incorporated the feedback you received from your instructor on your previous work in this course via the following criterion:
  • Integrate writing feedback to improve the clarity and quality of final product.
  • You will also be assessed on the completion of hours toward your practicum experience.
  • Demonstrate completion of hours toward the practicum experience.
  • See the scoring guide for specific grading criteria related to these requirements.
    Please carefully review the outline below to see which parts of the final submission will align to which program outcomes. (Note: The bullet points in the outline correspond to the grading criteria from your previous assessments. It may be worth putting in some extra revisions on the material related to criteria on which you did not previously score as well as you would have liked. You may also wish to read the Guiding Questions: Final Project Submission document to better understand how each aspect of your submission will be assessed.) It is important to remember that if you do a quality job addressing the points below, you will meet all of the program outcomes. The alignment is provided for transparency, but do not become preoccupied with how each point will feed into the scoring guide.
    Abstract
  • Summarize the purpose, approach, and any relevant findings of the final capstone project submission (PO #1).
  • Introduction
  • Summarize your need, target population, and setting (PO #1).
  • Provide a high-level overview of your intervention plan (PO #4).
  • Justify the importance of your need and intervention plan (PO #1).
  • Provide a high-level overview of your implementation plan (PO #4).
  • Provide a high-level over view of your evaluation plan (PO #4).
  • Reminder: these instructions are an outline. Your heading for this this section should be Problem Statement and not Part 1: Problem Statement.
    Part 1: Problem Statement
    Need Statement
  • Analyze a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education or management need (PO #1).
  • Population and Setting
  • Describe a target population and setting in which an identified need will be addressed (PO #4).
  • Intervention Overview
  • Explain an overview of one or more interventions that would help address an identified need within a target population and setting (PO #3).
  • Comparison of Approaches
  • Analyze potential interprofessional alternatives to an initial intervention with regard to their possibilities to meet the needs of the project, population, and setting. (PO #5).
  • Initial Outcome Draft
  • Define an outcome that identifies the purpose and intended accomplishments of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education or management need (PO #4).
  • Time Estimate
  • Propose a rough time frame for the development and implementation of an intervention to address and identified need (PO #1).
  • Part 2: Literature Review
  • Analyze current evidence to validate an identified need and its appropriateness within the target population and setting (PO #2).
  • Evaluate and synthesize resources from diverse sources illustrating existing health policy that could impact the approach taken to address an identified need (PO #7).
  • PART 3: INTERVENTION PLAN
    Intervention Plan Components
  • Define the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need (PO #4).
  • Explain the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components (PO #4).
  • Theoretical Foundations
  • Evaluate theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan (PO #6).
  • Justify the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices (PO #2).
  • Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations
  • Analyze the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and specific components of an intervention plan (PO #7).
  • Ethical and Legal Implications
  • Analyze relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and specific components of an intervention plan (PO #1).
  • Part 4: Implementation Plan
    Management and Leadership
  • Propose strategies for leading, managing, and implementing professional nursing practices to ensure interprofessional collaboration during the implementation of an intervention plan (PO #5).
  • Analyze the implications of change associated with proposed strategies for improving the quality and experience of care while controlling costs (PO #1).
  • Delivery and Technology
  • Propose appropriate delivery methods to implement an intervention which will improve the quality of the project (PO #3).
  • Evaluate the current and emerging technological options related to the proposed delivery methods (PO #6).
  • Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations
  • Analyze stakeholders, regulatory implications, and potential support that could impact the implementation of an intervention plan (PO #5).
  • Propose existing or new policy considerations that would support the implementation of an intervention plan (PO #7).
  • Timeline
  • Propose a timeline to implement an intervention plan with reference to specific factors that influence the timing of implementation (PO #1).
  • Part 5: Evaluation of Plan
  • Define the outcomes that are the goal of an intervention plan (PO #4).
  • Create an evaluation plan to determine the impact of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need (PO #3).
  • Part 6: Discussion
    Advocacy
  • Analyze the nurse’s role in leading change and driving improvements in the quality and experience of care (PO #1).
  • Explain how the intervention plan affects nursing and interprofessional collaboration, and how the health care field gains from the plan (PO #5).
  • Future Steps
  • Explain how the current project could be improved upon to create a bigger impact in the target population as well as to take advantage of emerging technology and care models to improve outcomes and safety (PO #6).
  • Reflection on Leading Change and Improvement
  • Reflect on how the project has impacted your ability to lead change in personal practice and future leadership positions (PO #1).
  • Reflect on the ways in which the completed intervention, implementation, and evaluation plans can be transferred into your personal practice to drive quality improvement in other contexts (PO #3).
  • Address Generally Throughout
  • Integrate resources from diverse sources that illustrate support for all aspects of the project as appropriate throughout the final submission (PO #2).
  • Clearly, concisely, and cohesively articulate a health care need, population, setting, stakeholders, supporting evidence, intervention, and evaluation (PO #6).
  • Integrate writing feedback to improve the clarity and quality of final product.
  • Length of submission: 20–25 pages (including references).
  • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • Number of resources: Minimum of 12–18 resources.
  • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

This is an assignment

Summarize and discuss the clinical characteristics of sleep apnea and identify the appropriate laboratory, imaging, and other diagnostic and screening tools that apply to this condition or disorder.

Explain why you selected these tests or tools as being appropriate for recognizing and diagnosing this condition. Recommend a plan of action for treating a patient with this condition. Support your summary and recommended plan with a minimum of two peer-reviewed references in addition to the course materials.

Discussion: Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists(ONE PAGE THREE REFERENCES PLEASE))

Nature offers many examples of specialization and collaboration. Ant colonies and bee hives are but two examples of nature’s sophisticated organizations. Each thrives because their members specialize by tasks, divide labor, and collaborate to ensure food, safety, and general well-being of the colony or hive.

Of course, humans don’t fare too badly in this regard either. And healthcare is a great example. As specialists in the collection, access, and application of data, nurse informaticists collaborate with specialists on a regular basis to ensure that appropriate data is available to make decisions and take actions to ensure the general well-being of patients.

In this Discussion, you will reflect on your own observations of and/or experiences with informaticist collaboration. You will also propose strategies for how these collaborative experiences might be improved.

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and reflect on the evolution of      nursing informatics from a science to a nursing specialty.
• Consider your experiences with nurse Informaticists      or technology specialists within your healthcare organization.

NURS 5051/NURS 6051: Transforming Nursing and Healthcare Through Technology

I live in Miami , Florida, working as psychiatric nurse for 12 years and doing on Walden University Nurse Partitional on Psych.’I want all my jobs are based in this information provided for me please’’. 

Due: Sunday night at 11:59pm Mountain Time

In this assignment, you will apply your knowledge of bias, perspective, and critical thought to a given example.

Step 1: Consider the scenario:

Most college instructors require students to turn off their cell phones in class so that their phones will not ring and also to prevent students from texting during class. The policy has become a serious point of contention among students, many of whom rely on cell phone applications to help organize their ever-changing schedules. Parents, too, have begun raising concerns over their children’s safety. Parents are worried that they will be unable to reach their children during an emergency if all phones are shut off. As a member of the College Board, it is your responsibility to read all such incoming mail. The following is a small sample:

Letter 1: Our civil liberties should never be subject to change. What the school board is attempting to do here is remind students that their rights can be given and taken away by authority. This particular case may be insignificant, but a larger philosophical debate regarding the inherent rights of the people is anything but minor.

Letter 2: I worked hard to get into college. The classroom encompasses everything I value in higher education. It is not the right place or time for students to be fiddling with their cell phones. As a student, I support the new initiative. I hope other students will understand why this move is so important.

Letter 3: I put my trust in the authority at hand. If school officials believe that having cell phones in the classroom is a distraction, I trust their judgment. The public is generally ignorant anyway, and it’s likely that they are expressing opinions out of emotion, not a sense of truth.

Step 2: Analyze different perspectives and biases.

In a two to three-page (minimum) written speech, to be given in front of an audience of parents and college faculty, in which you support the school’s decision to turn off cell phones during class, address the following. Use the aforementioned letters as examples to refute:

• Identify evidence of bias in each of the three letters. How can you describe the notion of bias?
• Define perspective. How does the concept of perspective influence the opinions of the speaker in each letter?
• Is the school’s new proposal fair? Give your view with a set of arguments to support your view.
• Give an opposing view to each letter and its arguments, and give your explanation for why your arguments should be more persuasive than the opposition’s.
• Is there a bias at work in your view as well?
• Briefly explain the perspectives of both sides of each argument. How does critical thought affect perspective?