Nursing – 2025 Find research articles in a peer reviewed source about a successful functional therapy

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Nursing – 2025

  • Find research articles in a peer-reviewed source about a successful functional therapy. 
  • Summarize the article by answering the following question: 
  1. What is the therapy?
  2. How is the therapy used for illness prevention, health promotion, and heath restoration?
  3. Give an example of how this therapy can empower patients?
  4. Identify  the actions you can take to work with patients who use functional  medicine and safeguard a patient’s rights that choose to use this  therapy.
  5. What are some of the limitations of this therapy?
  6. Include any other pertinent information.

1000 Words Children’s Health Insurance Program Due 3-23-21 – 2025 Children s Health Insurance Program CHIP Respond to the 5 questions in 200 words per question using

by

Nursing Assignment Help

1000 Words Children’s Health Insurance Program Due 3-23-21 – 2025

Children’s Health Insurance Program CHIP. Respond to the 5 questions in 200 words per question using at least 4 source. 

1. What is the CHIP program? When and how was it established? how does it benefit children’s health and wellbeing and that of the overall population? 

2. How could the CHIP program continue to be successfully funded?

3. Who do you feel should be covered in the program?

4. How should the qualifications be set for being accepted?

5. Revise one evidence-based article regarding this program and the impact it has. 

Reply To My Peers – 2025 Respond to at least 2 of your peers submissions In your participation responses to your peers

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Reply To My Peers – 2025

Respond to at least 2 of your peers’ submissions. In your participation responses to your peers, comments must demonstrate thorough analysis of postings and extend meaningful discussion by building on previous postings.

Peer 1

A man by the name of Kurt Lewin composed a theory about change using a force field model (Butts, 2018). The model uses several stages to describe the process of change. The first stage being “unfreezing”, which refers to the current state (Burnes & Bargal, 2017). The second and three stage happen almost simultaneously. The second stage is when the change happens (called “moving”), and the third stage known as “refreezing” refers to the habit becoming the new norm (Burnes & Bargal, 2017). In order for these changes to happen though Lewin noted certain events must occur. For these changes to happen the person must first want to change and break away from what has become custom to them (Burnes & Bargal, 2017).

A few years ago at my job in the intensive care unit we changed the way we did our shift report. Before the change when we did shift report we would go in check our drips, vent settings, tube measurements, and do a quick patient turn. We began experiencing an increase in skin breakdown in our patients, so we implemented a full skin assessment during shift report. If any skin abnormalities were noticed we were to document them, and place a wound care consult. 

The change did follow the steps presented in Lewin’s theory. The freezing stage was realizing there was a problem in early assessment of skin breakdown. The moving part was the implementation of the full skin assessment during shift change with both nurses present. Finally, the refreezing was the continuation of this every shift to current day. Since this change was made we had seen a dramatic decrease in skin breakdown in most of our critically ill patient. The process of this change went smoothly on all units.

References

Burnes, B., & Bargal, D. (2017). Kurt lewin: 70 years on. Journal of Change Management, 17(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2017.1299371

Butts, J. B. (2018). Philosophies and theories for advanced nursing practice (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Peer 2

Lewin’s Theory of Change was a process that should make implementing new processes easier in the workplace. According to Bakari, Hunira, and Niazi (2017), Lewin had multiple change theories but the three-step model focused on getting behaviors changed to better suit the needs of the organization. It consists of unfreezing, moving, and refreezing. The unfreezing process is when the leadership stops the original way of performing a task. It is important for the employees to see that the original way is no longer the best way and leadership should be ready to resistance in some form. The driving forces of what makes the new way better must outweigh the resistance. Once the awareness has been made, the movement into the new way can be made. This is where the actual change takes place and should be an easier process since the driving forces have already overcome the resistance (Bredow & Peterson, 2017). After the moving process, the group must move towards the refreezing step. This is when the new way is fully implemented and accepted by all parts of the organization. A recent change at my work place is the method in which we contact our physicians. We originally would use a text style page that could be done directly from the chart. The new way was more of an instant messenger that could be directly attached to a patient chart. As with any change, there were some nay-sayers in the beginning, but as it was used a few times the staff realized that you could enter more information and get an instant response because the physician didn’t have to stop and call. The physicians liked it better because they were able to access this feature on their cell phones and send a reply without calling. It is now fully implemented and works so much better than the original messaging.

Bakari, H., Hunjra, A. I., & Niazi, G. S. K. (2017). How Does Authentic Leadership Influence Planned             Organizational Change? The Role of Employees’ Perceptions: Integration of Theory of Planned    Behavior and Lewin’s Three Step Model. Journal of Change Management, 17(2), 155–187.       https://doi-org.su.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/14697017.2017.1299370

Pathophysiology Case Study – 2025 11 year old boy complains of wheezing and difficulty getting enough air Notices it

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Pathophysiology Case Study – 2025

11-year-old boy complains of wheezing and difficulty “getting enough air.” Notices it more when he is playing baseball and symptoms improve when exercise activity stops. He says that the symptoms are getting worse and the symptoms are even occurring at rest. Mother says the child is allergic to cat dander and his next-door neighbor in their apartment building recently began sheltering cats for the local humane society. Auscultation demonstrates wheezes on forced expiration throughout all lung fields. 

Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:  Each bullet point should reflect a subject heading followed by subsequent content reflective of primary sources of reference as well as Standards of Care. 

  • The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these processes interact to affect the patient.

https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/pmc/articles/PMC4961993/

RUBRIC:

               Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following:

Explain both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.           Points:       Points Range:    28 (28%) – 30 (30%) The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms.

The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The response describes the patient symptoms.

The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    23 (23%) – 24 (24%) The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate.

The response includes reasons for the cardiovascular and/or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    0 (0%) – 22 (22%) The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing.

The response does not include reasons for either the cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.    Feedback:     Explain how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.           Points:       Points Range:    28 (28%) – 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The response includes an accurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    23 (23%) – 24 (24%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    0 (0%) – 22 (22%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.    Feedback:     Explain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.           Points:       Points Range:    23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response includes an accurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, and/or explanations based on inappropriate evidence/research.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.    Feedback:     Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.           Points:       Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.     

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.      

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.    Feedback:     Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation           Points:       Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.    Feedback:     Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.           Points:       Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.    Feedback:           Points:       Points Range:    0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.    Feedback:   Show DescriptionsShow Feedback

Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examing the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following:

Explain both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes of why the patient presents these symptoms.–

Levels of Achievement:Excellent28 (28%) – 30 (30%)The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms.

The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.Good25 (25%) – 27 (27%)The response describes the patient symptoms.

The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for both the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.Fair23 (23%) – 24 (24%)The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate.

The response includes reasons for the cardiovascular and/or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.Poor0 (0%) – 22 (22%)The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing.

The response does not include reasons for either the cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.Feedback:

Explain how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.–

Levels of Achievement:Excellent28 (28%) – 30 (30%)The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.Good25 (25%) – 27 (27%)The response includes an accurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.Fair23 (23%) – 24 (24%)The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.Poor0 (0%) – 22 (22%)The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes interact to affect the patient.Feedback:

Explain any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.–

Levels of Achievement:Excellent23 (23%) – 25 (25%)The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.Good20 (20%) – 22 (22%)The response includes an accurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.Fair18 (18%) – 19 (19%)The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, and/or explanations based on inappropriate evidence/research.Poor0 (0%) – 17 (17%)The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning, or the explanations are based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.–

Levels of Achievement:Excellent5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.Good4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.     

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.Fair3 (3%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.      

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.Poor0 (0%) – 2 (2%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–

Levels of Achievement:Excellent5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Fair3 (3%) – 3 (3%)Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Poor0 (0%) – 2 (2%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Levels of Achievement:Excellent5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.Good4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.Fair3 (3%) – 3 (3%)Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.Poor0 (0%) – 2 (2%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.Feedback: Total Points: 100

Nursing – 2025 Must be at least 300 words with at least one scholarly article within the past five years We are

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Nursing – 2025

Must be at least 300 words with at least one scholarly article within the past five years.   

We are coming up on a year of the increased allowances for telehealth visits due to COVID and it will expire in many states March 31st. How do you foresee this affecting patient outcomes in the future?

Discussion4 Nutrition Counseling – 2025 Healthy People 2020 identifies objectives related to nutrition and its role in promoting health and reducing chronic disease risk Choose

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Discussion4 Nutrition Counseling – 2025

Healthy People 2020 identifies objectives related to nutrition and its role in promoting health and reducing chronic disease risk. Choose one preventable chronic condition from the list (type 2 diabetes). As a nurse practitioner, how will you educate your patient about nutrition to help prevent your chosen chronic condition? Support your answer with evidence-based research. 

Expectations

Initial Post:

  • Length: A minimum of 250 words, not including references
  • Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years

    Required Textbook and Readings

    Edelman, C. L., & Kudzma, E. C.. (2018). Health Promotion Throughout the Life Span, 9th edition. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, Mosby. ISBN: 978-0-323-416733

chronic disease type 2 diabetes

Case Study – 2025 MSN 5550 Health Promotion Prevention of Disease Case Study Module 12 Instructions Read the following case study and answer

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Case Study – 2025

 MSN 5550 Health Promotion: Prevention of Disease Case Study Module 12 Instructions: Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide rationales for your answers. Make sure to provide citations/references for your answers in APA format. Deadline: Due by Sunday at 23:59 p.m. CASE STUDY: Drug-Facilitated Sexual Assault: Jessica Sexual assault includes any type of sexual activity to which an individual does not agree. Because of the effects of some drugs, commonly called date rape drugs, victims may be physically helpless, unable to refuse, or even unable to remember what happened. Jessica, a 16-year-old high school sophomore, expresses concern to the school nurse practitioner that she knows someone who might have had sex “without knowing it.” How can the nurse practitioner answer these common questions? Reflective Questions 1. What are date rape drugs and how can a person be unaware that such a drug has been ingested? 2. What can you do to protect yourself? 3. What do you do if you think you have been sexually assaulted? 4. What can you do when someone you care about has been sexually assaulted? 5. What role does a nurse practitioner play in the care of sexually assaulted patients, particularly in the adolescent age group? 

NEED ESSAY BY 4/1…PLEASE CAREFULLY READ AND FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS FOR ASSIGNMENT…SCHOLARLY RESOURCES ONLY….NO PLAGARISM…. – 2025 Required Assignment Topic Note You will use the same scenario you developed and same

by

Nursing Assignment Help

NEED ESSAY BY 4/1…PLEASE CAREFULLY READ AND FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS FOR ASSIGNMENT…SCHOLARLY RESOURCES ONLY….NO PLAGARISM…. – 2025

 Required Assignment Topic

Note: You will use the same scenario you developed and same mHealth app you identified in Week 2.

Requirements and Guidelines

  • Download the required Milestone 2 Template (Links to an external site.). Save it to your computer with the file name: Your Last Name NR361 Milestone 2.docx.
  • Briefly state the patient scenario from the Milestone 1 assignment.
    • Include revisions, if required by Milestone 1 faculty feedback.
  • Identify (3) teaching areas to improve patient outcomes.
    • Information to be taught to the patient should include information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the information that is provided. Remember to cite the mHealth app when appropriate in the Teaching Area (See template).
    • Use bullet points
  • Describe 3 ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app.
    • Use bullet points
    • mHealth app citation and reference in APA format.  See placement of these on the template.
  • You are required to complete the form using the productivity tools required by Chamberlain University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu  
  • Carefully review the grading rubric criteria for Milestone 2 and type directly on your saved Milestone 2 Template.
  • Use instructor feedback from Milestone 1 to improve your statements regarding the patient scenario in Milestone 2.

Clinical Prevention And Biostatistics – 2025 Go to HealthMap Read through the website and watch the cartoon video titled What is HealthMap

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Clinical Prevention And Biostatistics – 2025

  

Go to HealthMap. Read through the website and watch the cartoon video titled, “What is HealthMap?” View HealthMap. Write a 2-page paper expressing how you, as an advanced practice nurse, can use and interact with this website. Include what outbreaks are currently being addressed in Virginia state. This assignment is to be written in current APA format, with a cover page and reference list. HealthMap must be listed as a reference.

BSN: Leadership And Management – 2025 What obstacles must be overcome for effective decision making What specific strategies can be used to

by

Nursing Assignment Help

BSN: Leadership And Management – 2025

What obstacles must be overcome for effective decision making? What specific strategies can be used to promote a climate in which critical thinking is fostered? What are the risks in decision making?

Prepare assignment following the APA style guideline
Prepare your assignment using no less than 500 words
Site at least two more resources to complete assignment