You have to create an E-Poster on what you see as the future of nursing practice and the role of nursing in the emerging health-care environment. You need to predict the future based on present evidence.

The E-Poster needs to include the following:

1. Introduction

2. Statement of the issue

3. Evidence supporting the issue

4. Prediction of the future role of the nurse

5. Conclusion

6. References: minimum of three references from peer-reviewed nursing journals (encourage the use of international journals). Articles need to be within the last 3 years unless historical.

In the reading this week, it is mentioned that in the next few years, a new government entity, the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, may be developed to encourage care management programs.  How do you feel nursing leaders could fit into this new institute?  What types of care management issues will this institute face?

please cite references

 Instructions – A Personal Reflection on Disasters or Mass Casualty Incidents

Course Objective met

1. Describe the human impact created by different types of disasters. 

Assignment Objectives met

-Describe possible effects on victims, families,   

     neighborhoods & communities

-Recognize societal factors that increase loss to

     life & property

-Describe possible effects on Healthcare

     providers & responders

-Recall nursing implications

OVERVIEW

Reflection is a method of thinking deeply. It allows us to ponder not only that which is obvious to our senses, but all layers of the event, even to the possible intangibles. At least three (3) of the following aspects of the event, should be used for the best possible grade: 

• physical [injuries, death],
• emotional [fear, loneliness, helplessness, etc.],
• spiritual [corporate worship, individual],
• environmental [human diversity, structures, access, etc.],
• various obligations [school, work, family care, etc.],
• and financial

 (Bogo, etal., 2011).

Option 1: Recollect a disaster or mass casualty incident that personally affected you (ie: you, your family, or your friends). If this is too painful for you to revisit, you may choose option two.

Option 2: If this has never occurred in your life, please consider a disaster or mass casualty incident that you are aware of by way of significant media/news exposure.

The subject matter may be recent or in the past. To refresh your memory, feel free to read old newspaper or internet reports. You must respond to all six (6) points below, and you must include at least 3 of the aspects mentioned in the Overview.

1. Describe what happened.

2. What were your thoughts and feelings as you lived the situation? (actual or vicariously)

3. What three (3 or more) aspects emerged throughout the event? (refer to the Overview above)

4. What did you learn about yourself or the event? (or those directly affected)

5. Why was the experience important to you?

6. Choose one thing you think would be helpful to those involved in the experience.

DIRECTIONS:

This Discussion Forum (DF) differs from what you are used to in the RN-BSN program. No references are ‘required’ (unless they apply), for this ‘one’ DF (see below). Something that has not changed is the skillful construction of your sentences, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and how well you spoke to the six (6) points above, and interjected at least three (3) of the possible aspects of the event (also shown above). 

This is a personal reflection and therefore, citations and references are not required. (However, citations and references are required “if” you are actually referring to someone else’s ideas. Ie: If you “quote” someone or use their “thoughts” about the event even in a newspaper, it is their idea.) Your response must be typed or copied and pasted directly into the discussion thread.  The maximum word limit is 400 (this is also different from a regular Discussion Forum). Please double space between paragraphs but do NOT use double spacing or indentions throughout your writing. No file can be uploaded. APA format “will” be graded if it exists.

      The same criteria concerning a personal reflection from the above paragraph, applies to the secondary posting. Your postings in response to your peers should be concise but facilitate a lively dialogue on the topic being discussed. Do NOT simply repeat information from your initial posting or your peer’s posting. The maximum word limit is 200. Please double space between paragraphs but do NOT use double spacing or indents throughout. APA format “will” be graded if it exists.

This activity is worth 10% of your total grade.  You can expect individual feedback within a week of the due date/time.

Reference:

M. Bogo, C. Regehr, E. Katz, C. Logie & M. Mylopoulos (2011).  Developing a tool for assessing students’ reflections on their practice. Social Work Education. 30 (2), 186-194.  DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2011.540392

APA format 3 peer references 1 from walden university library MSN 1 page long and due Sept 15,2018 at 4pm.  There are references attached to use

The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test is a blood test used to screen males for prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of death related to cancer among men in the United States. It is important that men approaching increasing age have their PSA levels checked. Obana and O’Lawrence (2015) stated that males over the age of 40 who have a family history of prostate cancer can benefit from electing to have their PSA levels checked. Those that do not have a family history of prostate cancer can also benefit from PSA testing, but it is not recommended as strictly until the population nears 50 years of age. The test is a simple blood test that involves a blood sample being drawn and sent to a laboratory for analysis. Once the results are determined, a healthcare provider can inform the patient of the results and discuss the indications. The test detects high levels of PSA in the blood, which should not be present in large amounts. High levels of PSA in the blood may indicate prostate cancer. Nordström, Adolfsson, Grönberg, and Eklund (2017) stated that PSA tests are an extremely useful first-line risk assessment for prostate cancer, but the test needs to be followed up with more conclusive testing for diagnosis if a man’s PSA levels are elevated. PSA testing is quick and inexpensive, making it an attractive option for initial prostate cancer screening. However, for diagnosis, more definitive diagnostic tests such as ultrasound, biopsy, or MRI fusion need to be performed (Nordström, Adolfsson, Grönberg, & Eklund, 2017).

            Other conditions, such as enlarged or inflamed prostate, can also increase the PSA levels. For this reason, PSA tests are not completely full-proof in terms of diagnosing prostate cancer, but they do provide a very good indicator. PSA tests serve as a very valid and reliable detector of potential prostate cancer and provide men with data proving that they need to seek additional screening for potential prostate cancer. However, PSA testing is not a very reliable indicator of definitive prostate cancer. Lawrentschuk (2016) stated that roughly 75 percent of men with elevated PSA levels are proven to not have prostate cancer after tissue biopsy. This proves the lack of reliability in predicting prostate cancer. PSA tests should be used to promote awareness concerning a man’s risk of developing prostate cancer. Upon increased serum PSA levels, it is recommended that men undergo more definitive screening for prostate cancer to determine diagnosis. Most often, the biggest indicator for whether or not prostate cancer is beatable is the time of the diagnosis. Prostate cancer that has progressed in stage is a lot more fatal than prostate cancers that are still in the initial stage. Obana and O’Lawrence (2015) noted that at times, men are not diagnosed with prostate cancer until the cancer has reached stage three or four and metastasized to other tissues and structures throughout the body. At this point, treatment becomes significantly more difficult. PSA tests provide men with an initial means of prostate cancer detection that can save their lives.

References

Lawrentschuk, N. (2016). PSA testing and early management of test-detected prostate cancer–consensus at last. BJU International, 117 Suppl 45-6. doi:10.1111/bju.13481

Nordström, T., Adolfsson, J., Grönberg, H., & Eklund, M. (2017). Effects of increasing the PSA cutoff to perform additional biomarker tests before prostate biopsy. BMC Urology, 17(1), 92. doi:10.1186/s12894-017-0281-8

Obana, M., & O’Lawrence, H. (2015). Prostate cancer screening: PSA test awareness among adult males. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 38(1), 17-43. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Conduct a literature search and find 4 articles about ‘Evidence-based practices that reduce health disparities

 Article must be peer-reviewed, between years 2012- 2017 

Create a Title page with running head, page number, Name, course name, name of college, professor, date  

D. Paper must be 1 and 1/2 pages long (not including the title page and reference page). Include headings within your paper according to APA format

a. Include the definition for health disparity, and evidence-based practice (Cite Sources)

b. Causes of health disparities (Cite Sources)

c. Identify a population from the literature with health disparities (Cite Sources)

d. Identify 2 evidence-based practices from the articles that reduce health disparities within your selected population

 Outcome/s of implementation of reductions. Use the literature to support your rationales for the outcomes (cite sources)

Implication to nursing practice- how will reduction impact your nursing practice

Create a reference page with articles in APA format (minimum 2 articles)

 Paper must be double- spaced (including title page), use font Times New Roman and size 12 font