In this assignment you will assume the role of a senior analyst hired by a fictitious company, Premium Acceptance, a midsized property insurance carrier. Premium Acceptance is performing well with respect to several key performance indicators, including policies in force, policy retention, and new business counts.

However, the company’s bottom line has been hindered due to poor loss ratios. A loss ratio is simply the difference between the ratios of claims paid by an insurance carrier and the ratio of premiums paid. The board of directors depends on the ability to forecast loss ratios, which in turn enables them to forecast profitability metrics to the shareholders. The organization will now consider implementing the use of statistics for measuring risks.

For this assignment, you will write a minimum three-page paper (not including APA title or references pages). In this paper, please address the following:

• Provide a general overview of statistics and how they support the risk assessment process.
• Discuss at least two statistical tools that can be employed to measure risk.
• Convey which tool best serves the company’s purposes and explain why it is.
• What are the ramifications of the organization electing not to use statistics in this process?
• Be sure to include an introductory paragraph at the beginning and a concluding paragraph at the end of your paper.
• Because your paper is required to be at least three pages in length, you should use subject headings to label your paper as appropriate.
• Be sure to include APA citations to support your assertions and to inform your paper.
• You will need to include an APA formatted reference page with this paper (separate from the body of your paper).
• Be sure to proofread your paper to ensure that is free from all grammar and spelling errors.

I have to write one full page about the study case and it should present my position (my opinion  or thesis statement) and  you have to put ethical theory to back up your analysis. You need to use an ethical theory to justify your argument.

( i will attached the case study that you have to write about and an example for the paper). ” the name of the paper is medical ethics paper 2″ you can see it as example 

the other paper is for the final but it should be just one full page about any issue in the medical ethics and you have to put an intruduction, thesis statement and one pargraph to talk about the argument or the issue. 

SLO# 2 – Aging

As we age, there are more and more challenges that come with physical aging. This is obvious, well understood, and at the forefront of a person’s mind as they age. What is less understood is the fact that effort should be put into maintaining brain (cognitive) health. Our brains operate much like our physical bodies do in the sense that it needs to be exercised in order to stay strong and healthy. 

1. Watch the following video on a company named, “Sharp Brains.” 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4F_GlciZEU (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Here is a link to the Sharp Brains website:

https://sharpbrains.com/

2. Select 2 adults (perhaps a relative, neighbor, co-worker, or a friend) who are in late adulthood (ages 65 and above) .  Ask these 3 questions:

1.  “What do you do to stay young and sharp?” 

2.  “Do these activities/techniques help you deal with/prepare for death and dying?”

3.   Given what you know now, is there anything you would do differently?”

3. Describe your interviewees (their ages, relationship to you, work/relationship status) and discuss their responses to each interview question.    (Paragraph 1)

4. Reflect on their responses and the information presented in the video, and answer the following questions: 

Do you believe the researchers in the video have found valuable ways to improve one’s cognitive abilities/skills?  What about the advice given by the older persons you interviewed? Do you intend to follow any of the suggestions given by the researchers or your interviewees? Why?  How do you intend to maintain your cognitive health and prepare for death and dying.  (Paragraph 2) 

• 2 pages
• Select one of the personality disorders from the DSM-5 (e.g., paranoid, antisocial, narcissistic). Then, select a therapy modality (individual, family, or group) that you might use to treat a client with the disorder you selected.
• Briefly describe the personality disorder you selected, including the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria.
• Explain a therapeutic approach and a modality you might use to treat a client presenting with this disorder. Explain why you selected the approach and modality, justifying their appropriateness.
• Next, briefly explain what a therapeutic relationship is in psychiatry. Explain how you would share your diagnosis of this disorder with the client in order to avoid damaging the therapeutic relationship. Compare the differences in how you would share your diagnosis with an individual, a family, and in a group session.

Step 1 Consider the scenarios below.

• Scenario 1: National Debt
  • If the national debt exceeds 125% of the national GDP, the economy will suffer.
  • The lawmakers in Washington are too engrossed in party politics to pay close attention to the economy.
• Scenario 2: Smoking
  • Decades of research have established a causal correlation between using tobacco and various forms of cancer.
  • Sarah has been smoking cigarettes for over 30 years.
• Scenario 3: Entertainment
  • Records sales have been steadily declining over the last 15 years, largely due to the increased popularity of peer-to-peer file sharing networks.
  • At the same time record sales are declining, the number of emerging artists releasing new music every week has skyrocketed. John has never even held an instrument and his record seems to be everywhere—what a phony!

Step 2 Draw and post scenario conclusions.

Review your course materials and then write three conclusions to the premises in each of the scenarios posted in Step 1.

• Provide possible conclusions for the statements presented in scenarios 1 and 2. Based on the information provided, which of the two scenarios do you believe is more logical? Be sure to provide support for your choice.
• Apply the concept of statements to scenario 3. Determine the presence of statement and non-statement. How are you able to classify one from the other?
• How are you able to apply the concept of logical support to the scenarios presented in step 1? How else can you apply the concepts of logical support in everyday decision making?