2025 Collaborative identification and interpretation of practice problems is a requirement of professional practice AACN

by

Evidence based practice 2025

Collaborative identification and interpretation of practice problems is a requirement of professional practice (AACN, 2008). Locating and summarizing literature using credible online databases is necessary for evidence-based nursing (AACN, 2008; QSEN, 2018). Purpose This assignment provides a learning activity for students to experience a practice-based scenario and apply a process worksheet designed to assist in the identification of an independent nursing problem or concern, develop a PICOT clinical question, and search for evidence using credible online databases/sources. Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes. CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7) CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 & 8) CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 & 8) CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs 7 & 8) Due Date Submit the completed PPL Worksheet by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3 . Points This assignment is worth 175 points . Directions 1. Read over each of the following directions. 2. You must read the Assignment Practice Scenario below before completing the PPL Worksheet. 3. Download and use the required PPL Worksheet (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. . 4. Review the information provided in our library of how to search for journal articles here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. . 5. Review the information provided in our library of how to locate and copy a journal permalink (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. . 6. You are required to complete the worksheet using the productivity tools required by University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, 7. Complete each section of the Problem/PICOT/Literature (PPL) Worksheet. For the Clinical PICOT Question , you are required to use one type of question from the American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing (AAACN). Please access the template to select the question type from the following link: American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing (AAACN). (2018). AAACN research toolkit: Template for asking PICOT questions . Retrieved from https://www.aaacn.org/sites/default/files/documents/misc-docs/1e_PICOT_Questions_template.pdf (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. 8. Be sure to use the PPL grading rubric to make certain you are meeting all grading criteria of the PPL Worksheet. 9. Use correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and in-text APA formatting. 10. Submit the completed PPL Worksheet on the Week 3 Assignment page. **Academic Integrity Reminder** College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments. By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment. Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page. Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page. NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page. Assignment Practice Scenario Your Chief Nurse Executive (CNE) recognizes you are pursuing your BSN and has asked you to be a member of the nursing evidence-based practice (NEBP) committee. She has advised the members that the purpose is to conduct nursing research studies involving clinical practice problems. Increasing nurses’ awareness of quality and safety concerns will help develop an attitude of inquiry and asking questions (Sherwood & Barnsteiner, 2017). Baccalaureate nurses “collaborate in problem identification, participate in the process of search, retrieval, and documentation of evidence, and integrate evidence using credible databases and internet resources” (AACN, 2008, pp. 16-17). The CNE has advised all members of the following areas of quality and safety clinical practice that each committee member needs to consider and choose one as a priority area for conducting a research study. Sources of research problems come from nursing clinical practice (Houser, 2018): Quality Safety Patient satisfaction Patient education Falls Non-pharmacological pain management Errors (any). Examples include: · Medication · Patient identification · Communication Readmissions Length of stay Costs Healthcare Associated Infections (HAIs). (Any type) Examples include: · Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections (CLABSI) · Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) · Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) · Surgical Site Infections (SSI) Sepsis Discharge Teaching/Coaching Transitions of Care/Level of Care Pressure Ulcers Skin Integrity Your CNE has requested that you are to select one area and complete the PPL Worksheet using that topic. The committee will collaborate and decide as a team which nursing clinical problem area will be the priority focus of their next research study. Thank you for your valuable contributions to this important NEBP committee. References American Association of Colleges of Nurses (AACN). (2008). Executive summary: The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice (2008). Retrieved from http://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AACN-Essentials Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. Sherwood, G., & Barnsteiner, J. (2017). Quality and safety in nursing: A competency approach to improving outcomes (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN). (2018). QSEN knowledge, skills, and attitude competencies . Retrieved from http://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/ NR439 PPL Worksheet Rubric NR439 PPL Worksheet Rubric Criteria RatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clinical Nursing Practice Problem Identify one quality or safety clinical priority area from the assignment guidelines practice scenario. Summarize the independent clinical nursing practice problem/issue you believe is the most important. Summarize your rationale (why) for choosing the problem. 25.0 pts Clearly identifies one quality and safety clinical priority practice problem from the assignment guidelines practice scenario. Thoroughly summarizes the importance of the problem/issue. Thoroughly summarizes the rationale (why) the problem was chosen. 22.0 pts Criteria from the first column are mostly summarized or one criteria lacks details or is missing. 20.0 pts Criteria from the first column are minimally summarized or two criteria lack details or are not present. 10.0 pts Criteria from the first column are poorly summarized. 0.0 pts Criteria are not discussed. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clinical PICOT Question Using the AAACN Template for Asking PICOT Questions located in the assignment guidelines, write out your PICOT question. You must use one type of question from the AAACN template. 20.0 pts PICOT question with all 5 elements correct. 18.0 pts PICOT question with 4 elements correct. 16.0 pts PICOT question with 3 elements correct. 8.0 pts PICOT question with 1-2 elements correct. 0.0 pts PICOT question with no elements correct or no PICOT question present. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome PICOT Elements Identify each of the elements for your PICOT. 20.0 pts All 5 PICOT elements are correctly identified. 18.0 pts 4 PICOT elements are correctly identified. 16.0 pts 3 PICOT elements are correctly identified. 8.0 pts 1-2 PICOT elements are correctly identified. 0.0 pts No PICOT elements are correctly identified or are not present. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence Retrieval Process Using the Chamberlain College of Nursing library, locate an original nursing report/article of a single nursing study published from a nursing source/journal within the last 10 years that is relevant to your chosen clinical nursing practice problem/issue. Provide a complete APA reference to the study and the permalink. *Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis, Systematic Reviews should not be used. 20.0 pts All of the five criteria are present or one criteria is missing: 1. Complete study reference is provided in APA. 2. Uses the Chamberlain College of Nursing library by providing the permalink for the study. 3. Study is less than 10 years old. 4. Single original nursing study. 5. Study is from a nursing source/journal *Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis, Systematic Reviews should not be used. 18.0 pts Missing two criteria from the A column. 16.0 pts Missing three criteria from the A column 8.0 pts Missing four criteria from the A column. 0.0 pts Missing all five criteria from the A column or none of the criteria are present. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Implications of Literature Evidence Summarizes how the study is relevant to your chosen clinical nursing practice problem/issue. Summarizes why you believe the nursing evidence-based practice committee should focus their next research study on this practice problem. 25.0 pts Thoroughly summarizes how the study is relevant to your chosen clinical nursing practice problem/issue. Thoroughly summarizes why you believe the nursing evidence-based practice committee should focus their next research study on this practice problem. Excellent details provided. 22.0 pts Mostly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria lacks details. 20.0 pts Fairly summarizes the criteria in the first column or one criteria is missing. Fair details are provided. 10.0 pts Poorly summarizes the criteria in the first column. Poor details are provided. 0.0 pts Criteria are not summarized or is missing. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Literature Search Terms Identifies 4 (or more) relevant searchable terms you used for your search for literature. 25.0 pts Identifies 4 (or more) relevant searchable terms used for the search for literature. 22.0 pts Identifies 3 relevant searchable terms used for the search for literature. 20.0 pts Identifies 2 relevant searchable terms used for the search for literature. 10.0 pts Identifies 1 relevant searchable term used for the search for literature. 0.0 pts No Marks 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Literature Search Strategies Identifies 4 (or more) relevant search strategies you used to narrow/limit your search for literature. 25.0 pts Identifies 4 (or more) relevant strategies used to narrow/limit the search for literature. 22.0 pts Identifies 3 relevant strategies used to narrow/limit the search for literature. 20.0 pts Identifies 2 relevant strategies used to narrow/limit the search for literature. 10.0 pts Identifies 1 relevant strategy used to narrow/limit the search for literature. 0.0 pts No strategies identified or strategies are not present. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Writing, Mechanics, Organization, Spelling, Sentence Structure, Grammar 8.0 pts Excellent writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. 1-2 errors noted. 6.0 pts Good writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. A few errors noted. 3.0 pts Fair writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Some errors noted. 2.0 pts Poor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Many errors noted. 0.0 pts Very poor writing, mechanics, organization, spelling, sentence structure, grammar. Errors throughout are noted. Writing is difficult to understand or follow. 8.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA In-Text Formatting for Cited Sentences 7.0 pts Excellent APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with no errors. 6.0 pts Good APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with 1-2 errors noted. 4.0 pts Fair APA formatting. Uses APA in-text citation formatting with some errors noted or does not use in-text citation formatting. 3.0 pts Poor APA formatting with many errors noted. 0.0 pts Very poor APA with errors noted throughout. 7.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assigned PPL Worksheet Used 0.0 pts Assigned PICOT Worksheet form NOT used for this assignment results in loss of 10% (17.5 points) from points possible. 17.5 points deducted 0.0 pts Assigned PICOT Worksheet form used for this assignment. 0 points deducted 0.0 pts Total Points: 175.0

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Review the Topic Materials and the work completed in NRS 433V to formulate a PICOT statement for your capstone

by

assignment 2025

Review the Topic Materials and the work completed in NRS-433V to formulate a PICOT statement for your capstone project. My topic is stroke A PICOT starts with a designated patient population in a particular clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. The intervention should be an independent, specified nursing change intervention. The intervention cannot require a provider prescription. Include a comparison to a patient population not currently receiving the intervention, and specify the timeframe needed to implement the change process. Formulate a PICOT statement using the PICOT format provided in the assigned readings. The PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project. In a paper of 500-750 words, clearly identify the clinical problem and how it can result in a positive patient outcome. Make sure to address the following on the PICOT statement: Evidence-Based Solution Nursing Intervention Patient Care Health Care Agency Nursing Practice Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone change proposal project, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project. A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Statement Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections: Title page Introduction section A comparison of research questions A comparison of sample populations A comparison of the limitations of the study A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice. Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal: Background Problem statement Purpose of the change proposal PICOT Literature search strategy employed Evaluation of the literature Applicable change or nursing theory utilized Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate re

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Read chapter 3 and watch the films Gone Baby Gone and Sleepers Pick one and judge the main

by

Gone Baby Gone 2025

Read chapter 3 and watch the films “Gone Baby Gone” and “Sleepers”. Pick one and judge the main FINAL action as moral or immoral. Support your position by applying Kant’s moral philosophy. 500 words minimum MLA format. Due on June 10th, NO LATER than at 11:50 pm. Minimum 3 sources from LIRN *Not applying Kant’s Categorical Imperative results in an automatic F. Nature of the Concept 1. The first premise is that a person acts morally if his or her conduct would, without condition, be the “right” conduct for any person in similar circumstances (the “First Maxim”). 2. The second premise is that conduct is “right” if it treats others/yourself as ends in themselves/yourself and not as means to an end (the “Second Maxim”). 3. The conclusion is that a person acts morally when he or she acts as if his or her conduct was establishing a universal law governing others in similar circumstances (the “Third Maxim”).

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Musculoskeletal and neurologic disorders can present complications for pediatric patients from infancy to adolescence These disorders affect patients physically and

by

Discussion: Diagnosis and Management of Musculoskeletal and Neurologic Disorders 2025

Musculoskeletal and neurologic disorders can present complications for pediatric patients from infancy to adolescence. These disorders affect patients physically and emotionally and often impact a patient’s ability to participate in or carry out everyday activities. Patients with these disorders frequently need long-term treatment and care requiring extensive patient management and education plans. Musculoskeletal and neurologic disorders present various symptoms because they affect multiple parts of a patient’s body. Consider treatment, management, and education plans for the patients in the following three case studies. Case Study 1: Clay is a 7-year-old male who presents in your office with complaints of right thigh pain and a limp. The pain began approximately 1 week ago and has progressively worsened. There is no history of trauma. Physical examination is negative except for pain with flexion and internal rotation of the right hip and limited abduction of the right hip. Limb lengths are equal. Case Study 2: Trevon is an 18-month-old with a 3-day history of upper-respiratory-type symptoms that have progressively worsened over the last 8 hours. His immunizations are up to date. Mom states he spiked a fever to 103.2°F this morning and he has become increasingly fussy. He vomited after drinking a cup of juice this afternoon and has refused PO fluids since then. Pertinent physical exam findings include negative abdominal exam, marked irritability with inconsolable crying, and he cries louder with pupil examination and fights head and neck assessment. You are unable to elicit Kernig’s or Brudzinski’s signs due to patient noncompliance. Case Study 3: Molly is a 12-year-old who comes to your office after hitting her head on the ground during a soccer game. Her mother reports that she did not lose consciousness, but that she seems “loopy” and doesn’t remember what happened immediately following her fall. She was injured when she collided with another player and fell backward, striking her head on the ground. She has no vomiting and denies diplopia but complains of significant headache. Physical examination is negative except for the presence of slight nystagmus. All other neurologic findings including fundoscopic examination are normal. To prepare: Review “Neurologic Disorders” and “Musculoskeletal Disorders” in the Burns et al. text. Review and select one of the three provided case studies. Analyze the patient information. Consider a differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study you selected. Think about the most likely diagnosis for the patient. Think about a treatment and management plan for the patient. Be sure to consider appropriate dosages for any recommended pharmacologic and/or non-pharmacologic treatments. Consider strategies for educating patients and families on the treatment and management of the musculoskeletal or neurologic disorder. By Day 3 Post an explanation of the differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study you selected. Explain which is the most likely diagnosis for the patient and why. Include an explanation of unique characteristics of the disorder you identified as the primary diagnosis. Then, explain a treatment and management plan for the patient, including appropriate dosages for any recommended treatments. Finally, explain strategies for educating patients and families on the treatment and management of the musculoskeletal or neurologic disorder.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Use the practice problem and a qualitative peer reviewed research article you identified

by

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 2025

Use the practice problem and a qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment. In a 1000-1,250-word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study. Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turninit. NRS-433V-RS-Research-Critique-Guidelines.docx

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 To prepare for this assignment view the following brief video from the American Medical Association titled Health Literacy and Patient

by

Environmental Factors and Health Promotion Pamphlet: Accident Prevention and Safety Promotion for Parents and Caregivers of Infant 2025

To prepare for this assignment view the following brief video from the American Medical Association titled, “Health Literacy and Patient Safety: Help Patients Understand.” The video can be accessed through the following link: https://youtu.be/cGtTZ_vxjyA Part I: Pamphlet Develop a pamphlet to inform parents and caregivers about environmental factors that can affect the health of infants. Use the “Pamphlet Template” document to help you create your pamphlet. Include the following: Select an environmental factor that poses a threat to the health or safety of infants. Explain how the environmental factor you selected can potentially affect the health or safety of infants. Offer recommendations on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants. Offer examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based research. A minimum of three scholarly resources are required. Provide readers with two community resources, a national resource, and a Web-based resource. Include a brief description and contact information for each resource. In developing your pamphlet, take into consideration the healthcare literacy level of your target audience. Part II: Pamphlet Sharing Experience Share the pamphlet you have developed with a parent of an infant child. The parent may be a person from your neighborhood, a parent of an infant from a child-care center in your community, or a parent from another organization, such as a church group with which you have an affiliation. Provide a written summary of the teaching / learning interaction. Include in your summary: Demographical information of the parent and child (age, gender, ethnicity, educational level). Description of parent response to teaching. Assessment of parent understanding. Your impressions of the experience; what went well, what can be improved. Submit Part I and Part II of the Accident Prevention and Safety Promotion for Parents and Caregivers of Infants assignment by the end of Topic 1. While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. NRS-434VN-R-Pamphlet-Template-Student.docx

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Throughout the course you have developed aspects of your Academic and Professional Development Plan You have

by

Wk 11 (03) 2025

Throughout the course you have developed aspects of your Academic and Professional Development Plan. You have thought a great deal about your vision and goals, your academic and professional network of support, research strategies and other tools you will need, the integrity of your work, and the value of consulting the work of others. With your portfolio in place, it is now time to finalize your blueprint for success. Much as builders remain cognizant of the building standards as they plan and begin construction, nurses must remain mindful of the formal standards of practice that govern their specialties. A good understanding of these standards can help ensure that your success plan includes any steps necessary to excel within your chosen specialty. In this Assignment you will continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan by developing the final component–a review of your specialty standards of practice. You will also submit your final version of the document, including Parts 1–5. To Prepare: Review the scope and standards of practice or competencies related to your chosen specialty in the resources for this module. Review the MSN specializations offered at Walden by viewing the module resource, Walden University. (n.d.). Master of Science in Nursing (MSN). Examine professional organizations related to the specialization you have chosen and identify at least one to focus on for this Assignment. Reflect on the thoughts you shared in the Discussion forum regarding your choice of a specialty, any challenges you have encountered in making this choice, and any feedback you have received from colleagues in the Discussion. The Assignment: Complete the following items and incorporate them into the final version of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan. With the resources specific to the MSN specialization and the, Walden University. (n.d.). Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) , shared in this module, write a paragraph or make a Nursing Specialty Comparison table, comparing at least two nursing specialties that include your selected specialization and second-preferred specialization. Write a 2- to 3-paragraph justification statement identifying your reasons for choosing your MSN specialization. Incorporate feedback you received from colleagues in this Module’s Discussion forum. Identify the professional organization related to your chosen specialization for this Assignment, and explain how you can become an active member of this organization.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the Functional Health Patterns

by

Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide.” -The community of interest is Scottsdale, Arizona USA. Address every bulleted statement in the 2 following sections with data or rat 2025

Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide.” -The community of interest is Scottsdale, Arizona USA. Address every bulleted statement in the 2 following sections with data or rationale for deferral. 1.) Value/Belief Pattern • Predominant ethnic and cultural groups along with beliefs related to health. • Predominant spiritual beliefs in the community that may influence health. • Availability of spiritual resources within or near the community (churches/chapels, synagogues, chaplains, Bible studies, sacraments, self-help groups, support groups, etc.). • Do the community members value health promotion measures? What is the evidence that they do or do not (e.g., involvement in education, fundraising events, etc.)? • What does the community value? How is this evident? • On what do the community members spend their money? Are funds adequate? 2.) Health Perception/Management • Predominant health problems: Compare at least one health problem to a credible statistic (CDC, county, or state). • Immunization rates (age appropriate). • Appropriate death rates and causes, if applicable. • Prevention programs (dental, fire, fitness, safety, etc.): Does the community think these are sufficient? • Available health professionals, health resources within the community, and usage. • Common referrals to outside agencies.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in

by

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change 2025

The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes. In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach. To Prepare: Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4. Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change. The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project) Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)Chicago Lakeshore Hospital Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general. Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered. Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation. Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change. Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking. Add a lessons learned section that includes the following: A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted An explanation about what you learned from completing the evaluation table (1 slide) An explanation about what you learned from completing the levels of evidence table (1 slide) An explanation about what you learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table (1 slide) Rurbic: Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. · Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail a healthcare organization, including a detailed explanation of its culture and readiness for change. The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail a current problem or opportunity for change. An accurate, specific, and detailed description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general is provided. Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The presentation accurately describes a healthcare organization, including an accurate explanation of its culture and readiness for change. The presentation accurately describes a current problem or opportunity for change. An accurate description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change implementation in general is provided. Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes a healthcare organization, including an inaccurate or vague explanation of its culture and readiness for change. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes a current problem or opportunity for change. An inaccurate or vague description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change implementation in general is provided. Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a healthcare organization, including an inaccurate and vague explanation of its culture and readiness for change, or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a current problem or opportunity for change or is missing. An inaccurate and vague description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change implementation in general is provided or is missing.Feedback: · Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an evidence-based practice approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered. · Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation. · Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change. · Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) The presentation clearly and accurately proposes in detail an evidence-based idea for a change in practice that is fully aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for decision making. The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail a plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a detailed plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation that is specific. The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based change. The presentation includes accurate, complete, and full APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected. Good 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) The presentation accurately proposes an evidence-based idea for a change in practice that is adequately aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for decision making. The presentation accurately describes a plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation that is adequate. The presentation accurately describes the measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based changes. The presentation includes accurate APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected. Fair 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely proposes an evidence-based idea for a change in practice that may be aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for decision making. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes a plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation that may be relevant. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based change. Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected are provided. Poor 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely proposes an evidence-based idea for a change in practice that is not aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for decision making or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption that implementation that is incomplete, or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based change or is missing. Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected are provided or are missing.Feedback: Add a lessons learned section that includes: · A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted. · What did you learn from completing the evaluation table? · What did you learn from completing the levels of evidence table? · What did you learn from completing the outcomes synthesis table?–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The presentation clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles previously submitted. The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one lesson learned from completing the evaluation table that is specific. The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table that is specific. The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table that is specific. The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the lessons learned explained. The presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation. Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The presentation accurately summarizes the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles previously submitted. The presentation accurately describes at least one lesson learned from completing the evaluation table that may include some specificity. The presentation accurately describes at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table that may include some specificity. The presentation accurately describes at least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table that may include some specificity. The presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed related to the lessons learned explained. The presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation. Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles previously submitted. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the evaluation table and may lack some specificity. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table and may lack some specificity. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table and may lack some specificity. The presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the lessons learned explained. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation. Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles previously submitted or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the evaluation table and lacks specificity or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table that lacks specificity or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table that lacks specificity or is missing. The presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources related to the lessons learned explained or is missing. The presentation fails to incorporate any resources to support the responses provided.Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct paper formatting with no errors. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (one or two) paper formatting errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) paper formatting errors. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 5 DQ 2 Over the ten years I have been a Registered Nurse I have daily interactions

by

Intervention and Ethical Decision-Making 2025

5 DQ 2 Over the ten years I have been a Registered Nurse, I have daily interactions with patients that both share and have a different worldview than I do. I find myself extremely lucky to work in a multicultural environment with co-workers, staff and patients that have many different religious cultural and overall worldviews. This environment has allowed me to understand other cultures a lot better, while being able to provide high quality care. An individual’s worldview of spirituality and faith affects, shapes impact their perspective (Grand Canyon University, 2018). I feel that my strengths in facilitating spiritual care for patients with different worldviews than mine include being open minded, understanding and being compassionate. It is important to educate patients and families on the importance of certain medications, treatments or plans, however ultimately the patient always has the right to refuse. It is our job to provide the best education and information that we possibly can however, the patient and family has the right to choose, and it is our ultimate duty to respect their decision. My weakness in facilitating spiritual care for patients include not knowing every different spiritual view. Every day, I feel I learn something new about what others believe in or value. I find asking culturally appropriate questions are truly helpful. For the most part, people are very willing to share and open up about their beliefs and why and what they value in their lives. It is also important to assess the patient and family for spiritual needs which can include dietary or medical restrictions. At my hospital, this assessment is done upon admission and can be a very helpful tool. For me personally, the person who would have the final say in terms of ethical decision-making and interventions in the event of a difficult situation would be my next of kin. At the moment, this role would go to my husband. I have found that regardless of cultures or religion, every family or individual is unique and has specific needs that are distinctive only to that person. It is essential that the nurse knows the needs of the individual patient in order to provide the best care possible. When it comes to facilitating spiritual care for patients with worldviews different from your own, what are your strengths and weaknesses? If you were the patient, who would have the final say in terms of ethical decision-making and intervention in the event of a difficult situation? Using 200-300 words APA format with at least two references. Sources must be published within the last 5 years.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025