2025 Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the Functional Health Patterns

Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide.” -The community of interest is Scottsdale, Arizona USA. Address every bulleted statement in the 2 following sections with data or rat 2025

Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide.” -The community of interest is Scottsdale, Arizona USA. Address every bulleted statement in the 2 following sections with data or rationale for deferral. 1.) Value/Belief Pattern • Predominant ethnic and cultural groups along with beliefs related to health. • Predominant spiritual beliefs in the community that may influence health. • Availability of spiritual resources within or near the community (churches/chapels, synagogues, chaplains, Bible studies, sacraments, self-help groups, support groups, etc.). • Do the community members value health promotion measures? What is the evidence that they do or do not (e.g., involvement in education, fundraising events, etc.)? • What does the community value? How is this evident? • On what do the community members spend their money? Are funds adequate? 2.) Health Perception/Management • Predominant health problems: Compare at least one health problem to a credible statistic (CDC, county, or state). • Immunization rates (age appropriate). • Appropriate death rates and causes, if applicable. • Prevention programs (dental, fire, fitness, safety, etc.): Does the community think these are sufficient? • Available health professionals, health resources within the community, and usage. • Common referrals to outside agencies.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change 2025

The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes. In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach. To Prepare: Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4. Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change. The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project) Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)Chicago Lakeshore Hospital Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general. Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered. Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation. Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change. Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking. Add a lessons learned section that includes the following: A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted An explanation about what you learned from completing the evaluation table (1 slide) An explanation about what you learned from completing the levels of evidence table (1 slide) An explanation about what you learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table (1 slide) Rurbic: Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: · Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. · Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail a healthcare organization, including a detailed explanation of its culture and readiness for change. The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail a current problem or opportunity for change. An accurate, specific, and detailed description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general is provided. Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The presentation accurately describes a healthcare organization, including an accurate explanation of its culture and readiness for change. The presentation accurately describes a current problem or opportunity for change. An accurate description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change implementation in general is provided. Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes a healthcare organization, including an inaccurate or vague explanation of its culture and readiness for change. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes a current problem or opportunity for change. An inaccurate or vague description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change implementation in general is provided. Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a healthcare organization, including an inaccurate and vague explanation of its culture and readiness for change, or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a current problem or opportunity for change or is missing. An inaccurate and vague description of the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with the change implementation in general is provided or is missing.Feedback: · Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an evidence-based practice approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered. · Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation. · Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change. · Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) The presentation clearly and accurately proposes in detail an evidence-based idea for a change in practice that is fully aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for decision making. The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail a plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a detailed plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation that is specific. The presentation clearly and accurately describes in detail the measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based change. The presentation includes accurate, complete, and full APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected. Good 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) The presentation accurately proposes an evidence-based idea for a change in practice that is adequately aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for decision making. The presentation accurately describes a plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation that is adequate. The presentation accurately describes the measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based changes. The presentation includes accurate APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected. Fair 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely proposes an evidence-based idea for a change in practice that may be aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for decision making. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes a plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation that may be relevant. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based change. Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected are provided. Poor 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely proposes an evidence-based idea for a change in practice that is not aligned to an evidence-based practice approach for decision making or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes a plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including a plan for knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption that implementation that is incomplete, or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the measurable outcomes desired for the implementation of the evidence-based change or is missing. Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles selected are provided or are missing.Feedback: Add a lessons learned section that includes: · A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted. · What did you learn from completing the evaluation table? · What did you learn from completing the levels of evidence table? · What did you learn from completing the outcomes synthesis table?–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The presentation clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles previously submitted. The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one lesson learned from completing the evaluation table that is specific. The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table that is specific. The presentation thoroughly describes in detail at least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table that is specific. The presentation provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the lessons learned explained. The presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the presentation. Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The presentation accurately summarizes the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles previously submitted. The presentation accurately describes at least one lesson learned from completing the evaluation table that may include some specificity. The presentation accurately describes at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table that may include some specificity. The presentation accurately describes at least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table that may include some specificity. The presentation provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed related to the lessons learned explained. The presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the presentation. Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The presentation inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles previously submitted. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the evaluation table and may lack some specificity. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table and may lack some specificity. The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table and may lack some specificity. The presentation provides a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed related to the lessons learned explained. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation. Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The presentation inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the critical appraisal process of the peer-reviewed articles previously submitted or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the evaluation table and lacks specificity or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the levels of evidence table that lacks specificity or is missing. The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes at least one lesson learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table that lacks specificity or is missing. The presentation provides a vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources related to the lessons learned explained or is missing. The presentation fails to incorporate any resources to support the responses provided.Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Feedback: Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–Levels of Achievement:Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct paper formatting with no errors. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (one or two) paper formatting errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) paper formatting errors. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 5 DQ 2 Over the ten years I have been a Registered Nurse I have daily interactions

Intervention and Ethical Decision-Making 2025

5 DQ 2 Over the ten years I have been a Registered Nurse, I have daily interactions with patients that both share and have a different worldview than I do. I find myself extremely lucky to work in a multicultural environment with co-workers, staff and patients that have many different religious cultural and overall worldviews. This environment has allowed me to understand other cultures a lot better, while being able to provide high quality care. An individual’s worldview of spirituality and faith affects, shapes impact their perspective (Grand Canyon University, 2018). I feel that my strengths in facilitating spiritual care for patients with different worldviews than mine include being open minded, understanding and being compassionate. It is important to educate patients and families on the importance of certain medications, treatments or plans, however ultimately the patient always has the right to refuse. It is our job to provide the best education and information that we possibly can however, the patient and family has the right to choose, and it is our ultimate duty to respect their decision. My weakness in facilitating spiritual care for patients include not knowing every different spiritual view. Every day, I feel I learn something new about what others believe in or value. I find asking culturally appropriate questions are truly helpful. For the most part, people are very willing to share and open up about their beliefs and why and what they value in their lives. It is also important to assess the patient and family for spiritual needs which can include dietary or medical restrictions. At my hospital, this assessment is done upon admission and can be a very helpful tool. For me personally, the person who would have the final say in terms of ethical decision-making and interventions in the event of a difficult situation would be my next of kin. At the moment, this role would go to my husband. I have found that regardless of cultures or religion, every family or individual is unique and has specific needs that are distinctive only to that person. It is essential that the nurse knows the needs of the individual patient in order to provide the best care possible. When it comes to facilitating spiritual care for patients with worldviews different from your own, what are your strengths and weaknesses? If you were the patient, who would have the final say in terms of ethical decision-making and intervention in the event of a difficult situation? Using 200-300 words APA format with at least two references. Sources must be published within the last 5 years.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 In 2008 Donald Berwick and colleagues provided a framework for the delivery of high

Evidence-Based Practice & The Quadruple Aim 2025

In 2008, Donald Berwick and colleagues provided a framework for the delivery of high value care in the USA, the Triple Aim , that is centered around three overarching goals: improving the individual experience of care; improving the health of populations; and reducing the per capita cost of healthcare. 1 The intent is that the Triple Aim will guide the redesign of healthcare systems and the transition to population health. FULL ARTICLE ATTACHED FOR ASSISTANCE Reflect on how Evidenced Based Practice might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare. Consider the impact that Evidenced Based Practice may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery . To Complete: Write a brief analysis of the connection between Evidenced Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address how Evidenced Based Practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of : 1. Patient experience 2. Population health 3. Costs 4. Work life of healthcare providers (2 pages only no longer than 2 pages) APA FORMAT WITH REFERENCES & IN-TEXT CITATIONS

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS INDICATED BELOW 1 ZERO 0 PLAGIARISM 2 ATLEAST 5 REFERENCES NO MORE

Assignment: Off-Label Drug Use in Pediatrics 2025

PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS INDICATED BELOW 1). ZERO (0) PLAGIARISM 2). ATLEAST 5 REFERENCES, NO MORE THAN 5 YEARS (WITHIN 5YRS, OR LESS THAN 5YRS) 3). PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHMENT FOR RUBRIC DETAILS AND RECOMMENDED WRITING TEMPLATE AND APA 7 STYLE. 4). Please review and follow the grading rubric details, and include each component in the assignment as required. Also, follow the APA writing rules and style, Title page, summary, Conclusion, References. 5) Please, Include the Title page, Introduction, purpose statement, Literature Review, conclusion, and reference page. Thank you very much. The unapproved use of approved drugs, also called off-label use, with children is quite common. This is because pediatric dosage guidelines are typically unavailable, since very few drugs have been specifically researched and tested with children. When treating children, prescribers often adjust dosages approved for adults to accommodate a child’s weight. However, children are not just “smaller” adults. Adults and children process and respond to drugs differently in their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Children even respond differently during stages from infancy to adolescence. This poses potential safety concerns when prescribing drugs to pediatric patients. As an advanced practice nurse, you have to be aware of the safety implications of the off-label use of drugs with this patient group. To Prepare Review the interactive media piece in this week’s Resources and reflect on the types of drugs used to treat pediatric patients with mood disorders. Reflect on situations in which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use. Think about strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Consider specific off-label drugs that you think require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics. Write a 1-page narrative in APA format that addresses the following: Explain the circumstances under which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use. Be specific and provide examples. Describe strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Include descriptions and names of off-label drugs that require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics. Therapy for Pediatric Clients with Mood Disorders An African American Child Suffering From Depression BACKGROUND INFORMATION The client is an 8-year-old African American male who arrives at the ER with his mother. He is exhibiting signs of depression. Client complained of feeling “sad” Mother reports that teacher said child is withdrawn from peers in class Mother notes decreased appetite and occasional periods of irritation Client reached all developmental landmarks at appropriate ages Physical exam unremarkable Laboratory studies WNL Child referred to psychiatry for evaluation MENTAL STATUS EXAM Alert & oriented X 3, speech clear, coherent, goal directed, spontaneous. Self-reported mood is “sad”. Affect somewhat blunted, but child smiled appropriately at various points throughout the clinical interview. He denies visual or auditory hallucinations. No delusional or paranoid thought processes noted. Judgment and insight appear to be age-appropriate. He is not endorsing active suicidal ideation, but does admit that he often thinks about himself being dead and what it would be like to be dead. You administer the Children’s Depression Rating Scale, obtaining a score of 30 (indicating significant depression) RESOURCES § Poznanski, E., & Mokros, H. (1996). Child Depression Rating Scale–Revised. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services. PLEASE NOTE BELOW: I have provided all the decision points about the drugs. Decisions point one is to pick one medication to begin, either Zoloft, Paxil, or Wellbutrin. I provided all decision points under each drug to follow if any changes are to be made. For Zoloft: Decision Point One Begin Zoloft 25 mg orally daily RESULTS OF DECISION POINT ONE Client returns to clinic in four weeks No change in depressive symptoms at all Decision Point Two Increase dose to Zoloft 50 mg orally daily RESULTS OF DECISION POINT TWO Client returns to clinic in four weeks Depressive symptoms decrease by 50%. Client tolerating well Decision Point Three Maintain current dose Guidance to Student At this point, sufficient symptom reduction has been achieved. This is considered a “response” to therapy. Can continue with current dose for additional 4 week to see if any further reductions in depressive symptoms are noted. An increase in dose may be warranted since this is not “full” remission- Discuss pros/cons of increasing drug dose with client at this time and empower the client to be part of the decision. There is no indication that the drug therapy should be changed to an SNRI at this point as the client is clearly responding to this therapy. For Paxil: Decision Point One Begin Paxil 10 mg orally daily RESULTS OF DECISION POINT ONE Client returns to clinic in four weeks Reduction in The Children’s Depression Rating Scale by 5 points overall, but with complaints of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea Decision Point Two Change to Prozac 10 mg orally daily RESULTS OF DECISION POINT TWO Client returns to clinic in four weeks There is a 25% reduction in symptoms, client’s side effects of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea have resolved. Client reports that he is feeling a “little bit better” Decision Point Three Continue current dose Guidance to Student You have two equally compelling choices at this point. The client has only been taking the current drug at its current dose for 4 weeks. It would be appropriate to continue at current dose. Additionally, you could also increase the dose to 20 mg orally daily. A discussion of risk/benefits should be had with the childs guardian regarding this and collaborative decision making should occur. There is no indication at this point that augmentation agents are required as the child is showing a partial response to therapy. For Wellbutrin: Decision Point One Begin Wellbutrin 75 mg orally BID RESULTS OF DECISION POINT ONE Client returns to clinic in four weeks Child is unable to fall asleep at night Decision Point Two Change to Lexapro 10 mg orally daily RESULTS OF DECISION POINT TWO Client returns to clinic in four weeks Child is tolerating Lexapro, and is sleeping at night. There is a 40% reduction in symptoms Decision Point Three Continue current dose Guidance to Student At this point, there is no indicating that you should change back to Wellbutrin as the child is tolerating the current medication without mention of side effects. Also, the child is experiencing a reduction in symptoms. You could also increase the dose to 15 mg orally daily, but the child has only been taking the drug for 4 weeks at this point. It may be more prudent to give the current therapy an additional 4 weeks before making any decisions to change current dose.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources if needed use APA style as required and check your

NURSING —-APA ONLY ASSIGNMENT 2025

Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources if needed, use APA style as required, and check your spelling. Assignment: Case Study: Mrs. Adams, a 68-year-old widow who was referred to case management upon discharge from the hospital based on her physician’s recommendation that she is not able to care for herself independently. Her diagnosis is diabetes, hypertension, and breast cancer. She is 5 days’ post-op from a right sided mastectomy. Mrs. Adams apartment is located in a low income area of the city where crime is prevalent. Upon assessment by the Community Health Nurse, Mrs. Adams apartment was in disorder with minimal airflow or light. Her cloths appeared unchanged and she had no food in the apartment. The small apartment also housed 3 cats and a small dog who Mrs. Adams considers family since the death of her husband 1 year ago. Mrs. Adams complains of pain and draining from her surgical site and a broken air conditioner. Using Nightingales Environmental Theory, what actions would the nurse take upon the first assessment? What are the five essential components of Nightingales Theory? Prioritize an appropriate care plan for Mrs. Adams? Apply Nightingale’s Environmental Theory to an area of your nursing practice, what patient population would benefit from this approach? Support this practice change with at least one evidenced-based article (this means current EBP of 5 years of less for the article.) The assignment should be completed in APA format, as an essay of between 1000 and 1500 words. The paper should include at least 2 outside references and the textbook. The paper should be in APA format with a title page, level headings, and reference page, please see the Shell that I have included in this module. 1st person is not acceptable in APA papers, make sure to keep this is 3rd person.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 APA format 7th edition Peer reviewed article Assignment The Impact of Nursing Informatics on Patient Outcomes

Assignment: The Impact of Nursing Informatics on Patient Outcomes and Patient Care Efficiencies 2025

APA format 7th edition. Peer reviewed article Assignment: The Impact of Nursing Informatics on Patient Outcomes and Patient Care Efficiencies In the Discussion for this module, you considered the interaction of nurse informaticists with other specialists to ensure successful care. How is that success determined? Patient outcomes and the fulfillment of care goals is one of the major ways that healthcare success is measured. Measuring patient outcomes results in the generation of data that can be used to improve results. Nursing informatics can have a significant part in this process and can help to improve outcomes by improving processes, identifying at-risk patients, and enhancing efficiency. To Prepare: · Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources. · Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies. The Assignment: (4-5 pages) In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following: · Describe the project you propose. · Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project. · Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples. · Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why. · Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team. Learning Resources Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus. Required Readings McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 525–535) Chapter 26, “Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge” (pp. 537–551) American Nurses Association. (2018). Inclusion of recognized terminologies supporting nursing practice within electronic health records and other health information technology solutions . Retrieved from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/official-position-statements/id/Inclusion-of-Recognized-Terminologies-Supporting-Nursing-Practice-within-Electronic-Health-Records/ Glassman, K. S. (2017). Using data in nursing practice. American Nurse Today, 12(11), 45–47. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ant11-Data-1030.pdf Macieria, T. G. R., Smith, M. B., Davis, N., Yao, Y., Wilkie, D. J., Lopez, K. D., & Keenan, G. (2017). Evidence of progress in making nursing practice visible using standardized nursing data: A systematic review. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2017 , 1205–1214. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5977718/ Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. (2017). Standard nursing terminologies: A landscape analysis . Retrieved from https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/snt_final_05302017.pdf Rutherford, M. A. (2008). Standardized nursing language: What does it mean for nursing practice? Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13 (1), 1–12. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol13No01PPT05. Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. Thew, J. (2016, April 19). Big data means big potential, challenges for nurse execs . Retrieved from https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/nursing/big-data-means-big-potential-challenges-nurse-execs Wang, Y. Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126 (1), 3–13. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019. Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. Required Media Laureate Education (Executive Producer). (2012). Data, information, knowledge and wisdom continuum [Multimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6051/03/mm/continuum/index.html Public Health Informatics Institute. (2017). Public Health Informatics: “shipping” information for better health [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1gNQ9dm0zg. Public Health Informatics Institute. (2017). Public Health Informatics: knowledge “architecture” [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sofmUeQkMLU.

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Evaluate the Health History and Medical Information for Mrs J presented below Based

Case Study: Mrs. J. 2025

Evaluate the Health History and Medical Information for Mrs. J., presented below. Based on this information, formulate a conclusion based on your evaluation, and complete the Critical Thinking Essay assignment, as instructed below. Health History and Medical Information Health History Mrs. J. is a 63-year-old married woman who has a history of hypertension, chronic heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite requiring 2L of oxygen/nasal cannula at home during activity, she continues to smoke two packs of cigarettes a day and has done so for 40 years. Three days ago, she had sudden onset of flu-like symptoms including fever, productive cough, nausea, and malaise. Over the past 3 days, she has been unable to perform ADLs and has required assistance in walking short distances. She has not taken her antihypertensive medications or medications to control her heart failure for 3 days. Today, she has been admitted to the hospital ICU with acute decompensated heart failure and acute exacerbation of COPD. Subjective Data Is very anxious and asks whether she is going to die. Denies pain but says she feels like she cannot get enough air. Says her heart feels like it is “running away.” Reports that she is exhausted and cannot eat or drink by herself. Objective Data Height 175 cm; Weight 95.5kg. Vital signs: T 37.6C, HR 118 and irregular, RR 34, BP 90/58. Cardiovascular: Distant S1, S2, S3 present; PMI at sixth ICS and faint: all peripheral pulses are 1+; bilateral jugular vein distention; initial cardiac monitoring indicates a ventricular rate of 132 and atrial fibrillation. Respiratory: Pulmonary crackles; decreased breath sounds right lower lobe; coughing frothy blood-tinged sputum; SpO2 82%. Gastrointestinal: BS present: hepatomegaly 4cm below costal margin. Intervention The following medications administered through drug therapy control her symptoms: IV furosemide (Lasix) Enalapril (Vasotec) Metoprolol (Lopressor) IV morphine sulphate (Morphine) Inhaled short-acting bronchodilator (ProAir HFA) Inhaled corticosteroid (Flovent HFA) Oxygen delivered at 2L/ NC Critical Thinking Essay In 750-1,000 words, critically evaluate Mrs. J.’s situation. Include the following: Describe the clinical manifestations present in Mrs. J. Discuss whether the nursing interventions at the time of her admissions were appropriate for Mrs. J. and explain the rationale for each of the medications listed. Describe four cardiovascular conditions that may lead to heart failure and what can be done in the form of medical/nursing interventions to prevent the development of heart failure in each condition. Taking into consideration the fact that most mature adults take at least six prescription medications, discuss four nursing interventions that can help prevent problems caused by multiple drug interactions in older patients. Provide a rationale for each of the interventions you recommend. Provide a health promotion and restoration teaching plan for Mrs. J., including multidisciplinary resources for rehabilitation and any modifications that may be needed. Explain how the rehabilitation resources and modifications will assist the patients’ transition to independence. Describe a method for providing education for Mrs. J. regarding medications that need to be maintained to prevent future hospital admission. Provide rationale. Outline COPD triggers that can increase exacerbation frequency, resulting in return visits. Considering Mrs. J.’s current and long-term tobacco use, discuss what options for smoking cessation should be offered. You are required to cite to a minimum of two sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to sub

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 Chapter 20 Fifty four year old Fred is complaining of a headache that started about 2 weeks

How is the concept “disorders of the brain” related to Fred’s presenting symptoms? 2025

Chapter 20 Fifty-four–year-old Fred is complaining of a headache that started about 2 weeks ago. For the past 2 days, the headache has increased in severity, and he is photophobic and has uncial rigidity and projectile vomiting. CT scan results show an arteriovenous malformation in the basal artery and a small hemorrhagic bleed in the middle meningeal artery. a. How is the concept “disorders of brain function” related to Fred’s presenting symptoms? b. What aspects of cerebral circulation would come into play in Fred’s case?

Nursing Assignment Help 2025

2025 ENGL 1020 Composition Analysis University of Memphis Rhetorical Analysis Essay Assignment Purpose The purpose of your

Rhetorical Analysis Essay Assignment 2025

ENGL 1020: Composition/Analysis University of Memphis Rhetorical Analysis Essay Assignment Purpose: The purpose of your rhetorical analysis is to analyze another writer’s argument. Of course, your essay should address what the writer has written, but the emphasis of your rhetorical analysis essay should be a close examination of how the writer has presented an argument . Your purpose is not to argue with (or state your agreement with) the writer’s position. Your primary purpose is to analyze the strategies and features another writer has used to be persuasive. Do not be diverted from your primary task: to demonstrate that you have uncovered interesting, important things about the way the author’s argument has been presented. Process: First, you need to choose an article to analyze. Consider the following options from Writing Memphis : “The Soul of Memphis” by Jamie Katz, pp. 19-39 “The Education of Dasmine Cathey” by Brad Wolverton, pp. 143-162 “Memphis Burning” by Preston Lauterbach, pp. 183-201 “The Resistance: Memphis Activism Sprouts Everywhere” by Flyer Staff, pp. 83-91 You may also find an argument about Memphis from another source, but if you choose this route then you must get the article approved by me before you begin writing. You do not need to agree with the argument to analyze it, but you should be careful to choose an argument that you can approach objectively, as you will not be critiquing the argument; you will be analyzing it. Your analysis should be no less than four pages long. What Should Be Analyzed? Listed below are the sorts of things your rhetorical analysis should consider. This list is neither a checklist nor an outline, and not every question will apply to every article. • Purpose (What is the writer trying to accomplish with the essay?) • Audience (To whom does the writer try to appeal? How does the writer try to connect with that audience?) • Organization (How has the writer structured and presented the argument?) • Nods to the Opposition (How does the writer anticipate and address arguments that might be made against his/her position?) • Definition (How does the writer define key terms used in the argument?) • Examples (What sort of examples/analogies does the writer use as evidence?) • Appeals to Authority (How does the writer use other sources, experts, statistics, etc.?) • Ethos (How does the writer present him/herself to the reader?) • Logos (How does the writer appeal to the reader’s sense of logical reasoning?) • Pathos (How does the writer appeal to the reader’s emotions, beliefs, and values?) • Kairos (How has the author made use of an opportune moment or place?) • Tone (What is the writer’s attitude towards the subject?) • Diction and Imagery (What are the effects of the writer’s word choices?) Submission: You will submit your paper digitally, via ecourseware. If you choose to analyze an article that we did not read in class, then you will also have to submit that article as an appendix. MLA citation and format are required. For specifics about format please see the course syllabus. Requirements: Four full pages (not including works cited page) MLA citation and format Submitted digitally to the Dropbox Avoid summary (beyond a brief introductory summary of your source)

Nursing Assignment Help 2025