Evaluating Sources of Information
In the world of click-bait articles, nutrition gurus and other sources of fraudulent nutrition information,
how  does one determine  what is  nutrition fact from fiction?  How  do  you  know  good  sources vs.  bad
ones?
For this assignment you will evaluate three (3) sources of nutrition information to determine if they are
good sources or not on a nutrition topic of your interest.
• You  must  include  at  least  one  publication  and  one  website  and  they  should  each  come  from  different
sections/categories (Coalitions, Professional, Consumer, etc).
• You must provide a written summary and evaluation for each source. Evaluations must include the following
criteria and information outlined below
• You will be graded on thoroughness of evaluation, attention to detail, well organized writing structure,
and ease of reading.

1. What is your Interest  in  the source?
• What is the source?
• Why did you chose this particular source of information?  How did you find it?
• What were you expecting when you found this source? Did the source fulfill your preconceived ideas and
expectations, or was it different than expected?
2. What  is the AUTHORITY  of  the source?
• Who is the author?
• What else has the author written?
• In which communities and contexts does the author have expertise?
o What are their credentials? Are they appropriate for information they provide?
o Do they have a formal role in a particular institution (e.g. a professor at Oxford)?
• Does the author disclose any conflict of interests (COI)?
3. What  is  the  PURPOSE?
• Why was this source created?
o Does it have an economic value for the author or publisher?
o Is it an educational resource? Persuasive?
 What (research) questions does it attempt to answer?
 Does it strive to be objective?
o Does it fill any other personal, professional, or societal needs?
• Who is the intended audience?
o Is it for scholars?
o Is it for a general audience?
4. What is  the PUBLICATION  & FORMAT of  the  source?
• Where was it published?
o Was it published in a scholarly publication, such as an academic journal?
o If a website, is the domain preferred (.edu, .gov, .org, or .net)?
o Was it formally peer-reviewed?

N F S 2 3 4 3    S u m m e r    2 0 2 0 P a g e  | 2  
• Does the publication have a particular editorial position?
o Is it generally thought to be a conservative or progressive outlet?
o Is the publication sponsored by any other companies or organizations? Do the sponsors have
particular biases?
• Were there any apparent barriers to publication?
o Was it self-published?
o Were there outside editors or reviewers?
• Does it provide information with limited advertising?
o Is it objective in presenting the information?
• Where, geographically, was it originally published, and in what language?
• In what medium?
o Was it published online or in print? Both?
o Is it a blog post? A YouTube video? A TV episode? An article from a print magazine?
o What does the medium tell you about the intended audience?
o What does the medium tell you about the purpose of the piece?
5. What is the Relevance and COVERAGE?
• What is the scope of coverage?
o Is it a general overview or an in-depth analysis?
o What information needs does the scope provide?
o Which time period and geographic region would the information be relevant?
6. Is the source CURRENT?
• When was the source first published?
• What version or edition of the source are you consulting?
o Are there differences in editions, such as new introductions or footnotes?
o If the publication is online, when was it last updated? Are the links up-to-date and active?
7. Is  the  information  ACCURATE?
• Did they cite their sources?
o If not, do you have any other means to verify the reliability of their claims?
• Who do they cite?
o Is the author affiliated with any of the authors they’re citing?
o Are the cited authors part of a particular academic movement or school of thought?
• Look closely at the quotations and paraphrases from other sources:
o Did they appropriately represent the context of their cited sources?
o Did they ignore any important elements from their cited sources?
o Are they cherry-picking facts to support their own arguments?
o Did they appropriately cite ideas that were not their own?
8. Overall Evaluation:
• Do you feel this media source is of value and reliable?
• What are the potential sources of bias within this media source (if any)?
• What is something new you learned by exploring and evaluating this media source?

Adapted from: http://guides.lib.berkeley.edu/c.php?g=83917&p=539735 

PSY 275 Week 3 Anxiety and Stress Disorders Worksheet

Complete the Anxiety and Stress Disorders Worksheet.

Anxiety and Stress Disorders

Match the following symptoms with the correct disorder.

1. ______ Lasts 6 months or longer; exposure to social situations which allow scrutiny by others; persistent fear may be present

2. ______ Exposure to trauma that is real or threatened

3. ______ Anxiety is created by the fear of social interactions

4. ______ Inability to remember trauma that happened to the person and symptoms are not because of substances or medical conditions

5. ______ Excessive and persistent worry for three months or longer

6. ______ Symptoms and maladaptive behavior may be present for a month following an attack

7. ______ Identity disruption is present with at least two personality states

8. ______ Sleep disturbance and heightened arousal to surroundings

9. ______ Panic attacks that recur unexpectedly

10. ______ Recurring memories, dreams, and/or flashbacks

11. ______ Gaps in memory of a personal nature often occur, and are not associated with typical forgetting

12. ______ Behavior is affected by worrying

13. ______ Negative thinking about self and events

14. ______ Fear of negative evaluation

15. ______ Avoiding situations that cause fear

A. Generalized Anxiety Disorder

B. Socialized Anxiety Disorder

C. Panic Disorder

D. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

E. Dissociative Amnesia

F. Dissociative Identity Disorder

Medical Record Review for key diagnostic and therapeutic information

Directions:
For this medical record abstracting assignment, first click the following link to access the medical record for a patient with a digestive system concern.

When you have examined the entire medical record document, click the link below to download the list of questions related to that record. Save your answers in this document and submit them for this module’s assignment.

As a foundation for engaging in scholarly writing, the nurse leader-manager or nurse informaticist must be able to engage in critical thinking and anticipate the needs, questions, and concerns of the intended audience. A scholarly writer must be able to craft a paper that demonstrates clarity, specificity, fairness, relevance, and consistency (Dexter, 2000).

As you reflect on the development of your Practicum Project Plan, take some time to consider how you will communicate your proposal objectively yet persuasively.

To prepare:

• Review the information in the Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview document introduced in Week 3. The overview describes the components that must be included in your plan.
• Reflect on the development of your Practicum Project Plan thus far. Address any questions you have and/or identify areas in need of further consideration or improvement.
• Develop any outstanding components of your Practicum Project Plan. For instance, you may need to continue your review of literature that justifies your project and create your project timeline.
• Review the information on scholarly writing in this week’s Learning Resources; be sure to integrate these principles as you develop your Practicum Project Plan.
• If you posted a draft of Practicum Project Plan in this week’s optional Discussion, incorporate, as appropriate, feedback you received from your colleagues.

To complete the Practicum Project Plan:

Write a 4- to 6-page scholarly paper that includes the following:

• Title
• Introduction
• Goal statement
• Project objectives
• Evidence-based review of the literature for project justification
• Methodology
• Resources
• Formative evaluation
• Summative evaluation
• Timeline
• Reference
• FOLLOW RUBRIC, USE HEADINGS, HAVE REFERENCES, DO LITERATURE REVIEW, USE THE MATIERIALS PROVIDED.  BE ON TIME