Anaphylactoid Syndrome of Pregnancy (amniotic fluid embolism) – 2025 Anaphylactoid Syndrome of Pregnancy amniotic fluid embolism Required elements Description of the disorder Priority Nursing Diagnosis and why Nursing

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Anaphylactoid Syndrome of Pregnancy (amniotic fluid embolism) – 2025

 Anaphylactoid Syndrome of Pregnancy (amniotic fluid embolism)

Required elements  

Description of the disorder    

Priority Nursing Diagnosis and why 

Nursing Assessment / Clinical Manifestations 

Nursing Plan/ Goals/ Outcomes 

Nursing Interventions  

Nursing Evaluations 

Patient and Family teaching 

Conclusion/ Summary 

Cites four (4) APA format references (at least 5 years old)

i want all the element above to be describe separate, each of the element in separate paragraph.

Week 7 Assg. – 2025 As you learned in previous weeks alignment means that a research study possesses

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Week 7 Assg. – 2025

As you learned in previous weeks, alignment means that a research study possesses clear and logical connections among all of its various components. In addition to considering alignment, qualitative researchers must also consider the ethical implications of their design choice, including, for example, what their choice means for participant recruitment, procedures, and privacy.

For this Discussion, you will evaluate qualitative research questions in assigned journal articles in your discipline and consider the alignment of theory, problem, purpose, research questions, and design. You will also identify the type of qualitative research design or approach the authors used and explain how it was implemented. Narrative, ethnographic, grounded theory, case study, and phenomenology are examples of types of research designs or approaches used in qualitative research.

With these thoughts in mind, refer to the Journal Articles document for your assigned articles for this Discussion. 

Article A:

Dale, C. M., Angus, J. E., Seto Nielsen, L., Kramer-Kile, M., Pritlove, C., Lapum, J., . . . Clark, A. (2015). “I’m no Superman”: Understanding diabetic men, masculinity, and cardiac rehabilitation. Qualitative Health Research, 25(12), 1648–1661. doi:10.1177/1049732314566323

Write a 1-2pg. critique of the research study in which you:

  1. Evaluate the research questions and hypotheses.

    The Research Questions and Hypotheses Checklist serves as a guide for your evaluation. Please do not respond to the checklist in a Yes/No format in writing your paper.

  2. Identify the type of qualitative research approach used and explain how the researchers implemented the design.
  3. Analyze alignment among the theoretical or conceptual framework, problem, purpose, research questions, and design.

Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Wk 5 (03) – 2025 Nurse scholars have a significant obligation to their community as well Their work must have academic and

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Wk 5 (03) – 2025

 Nurse-scholars have a significant obligation to their community as well. Their work must have academic and professional integrity. Their efforts are designed to add to the body of knowledge, advance the profession, and ultimately help in the care of patients. Work that lacks integrity is subject to erode quickly or worse. 

 

The Assignment:

Part 3, Section 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity

Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Module 1 and expanded in Module 2, write a 2- to 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following:

  • Explanation for the relationship between academic integrity and writing
  • Explanation for the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics
  • Cite at least two resources that support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting.
  • Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product.
  • Explain how Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity.

Part 3, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work

Expand on your thoughts from Section 1 by:

  • identifying and describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your: (1) academic work as a student of the MSN program and (2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.

Case Study on Moral Status n Moral Status – 2025 Based on Case Study Fetal Abnormality and other required topic study materials write

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Case Study on Moral Status n Moral Status – 2025

            

Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and other required topic study materials, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

  1. What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
  2. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
  3. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
  4. What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Remember to support your responses with the topic of study materials.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

literature review – 2025 While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they

by

Nursing Assignment Help

literature review – 2025

 

While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone change proposal project, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project.

A literature review analyzes how current research supports the PICOT, as well as identifies what is known and what is not known in the evidence. Students will use the information from the earlier PICOT Statement Paper and Literature Evaluation Table assignments to develop a 750-1,000 word review that includes the following sections:

  1. Title page
  2. Introduction section
  3. A comparison of research questions
  4. A comparison of sample populations
  5. A comparison of the limitations of the study
  6. A conclusion section, incorporating recommendations for further research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite

Cultural Competence in Ethical Decision Making, week14 – 2025 Cultural Competence in Ethical Decision Making Read chapter 14 of the class textbook

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Cultural Competence in Ethical Decision Making, week14 – 2025

 

Cultural Competence in Ethical Decision Making

Read chapter 14 of the class textbook and review the attached PowerPoint presentation.  Once done, please present an essay on health care inequity and how a moral philosophy affects the decision making of nurses.

Make sure that the essay includes the following;

  1.  Include the ramifications of the unequal treatment of health care for a group and include the implications for both health care providers and patients.
  2.  What health issues may be better addressed by a nursing care staff with knowledge about inequity and the ethical principles and theories of human rights?

INSTRUCTIONS:

As stated in the syllabus present your assignment in an APA format word document, Arial 12 font attached to the forum in the discussion tab of the blackboard titled “Week 14 discussion questions” and the SafeAssign exercise in the assignment tab of the blackboard(which is mandatory).  A minimum of 3 evidence-based references besides the class textbook no older than 5 years must be used and quoted according to APA guidelines and must be from a gerontology journal. 700 words except first page and references. 

Health Assessment – 2025 Post a question Help Homework Answers Login Not a Member Sign up DQ 1A Effective communication is

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Health Assessment – 2025

HOMEWORKMARKET.COM – YOUR HOMEWORK ANSWERS

DQ#1A

Effective communication is vital to constructing an accurate and detailed patient history. A patient’s health or illness is influenced by many factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental setting. As an advanced practice nurse, you must be aware of these factors and tailor your communication techniques accordingly. Doing so will not only help you establish rapport with your patients, but it will also enable you to more effectively gather the information needed to assess your patients’ health risks.

For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for a particular new patient assigned by your Instructor.

To prepare:

With the information presented in Chapter 1 of Ball et al. in mind, consider the following:

· By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned a new patient profile by your Instructor for this Discussion. Note: Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your new patient profile assignment.

Case C 38-year-old Native American pregnant female living on a reservation

· How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?

· How might you target your questions for building a health history based on the patient’s social determinants of health?

· What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with each patient, or what questions would you ask each patient to assess his or her health risks.

· Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that should be taken into consideration.

· Select one of the risk assessment instruments presented in Chapter 1 or Chapter 5 of the Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination text, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient.

· Develop at least five targeted questions you would ask your selected patient to assess his or her health risks and begin building a health history.

By Day of Week 1

1-Post a Summary of the Interview and a Description of the Communicationtechniques you would use with your assigned patient.

“Case C 38-year-old Native American pregnant female living on a reservation”

2-Explain Why you would use these techniques.

3-Identify the risk Assessment Instrumentyou selected and Justify Why it would be applicable to the selected patient.

4-Provide at Least Five targeted questionsyou would ask the patient.

research 2 – 2025 Quantitative Research Write a fully developed and detailed APA essay addressing each of the following

by

Nursing Assignment Help

research 2 – 2025

Quantitative Research

Write a fully developed and detailed APA essay addressing each of the following points/questions. There is no required word count; be sure to completely answer all the questions for each question in detail. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least one (1) source using citations in your essay. Make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page are required. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

Conduct a literature search to select a quantitative research study related to the problem identified in Module 1 and conduct an initial critical appraisal. Respond to the overview questions for the critical appraisal of quantitative studies, including:

  • Is this quantitative research report a case study, case control study, cohort study, randomized control trial or systematic review?
  • Where does the study fall in the hierarchy of evidence in terms of reliability and risk of bias?
  • Why was the study done? (Define the problem and purpose.)
  • Were the steps of the study clearly identified?
  • What was the sample size?
  • Are the measurements of major variables reliable and valid? Explain.
  • How were the data analyzed?
  • Were there any untoward events during the conduct of the study?
  • How do the results fit with previous research in the area? (This may be reflected in the literature review.)
  • What does this research mean to clinical practice?

Additionally, be sure to include the rapid appraisal questions for the specific research design of the quantitative study that you have chosen. These can be found in Chapter 5 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015). 

This critical appraisal should be written in complete sentences (not just a numbered list) using APA format. 

Provide a reference for the article according to APA format and a copy of the article.

Assignment Expectations:

Length: Clearly and fully answer all questions; attach a copy of the article
Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.
References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of one (1) scholarly source for the article is required for this assignment.
Rubric: This assignment uses a rubric for scoring. Please review it as part of your assignment preparation and again prior to submission to ensure you have addressed its criteria at the highest level.

SEE ATTACHMENT FOR INITIAL STUDY

Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – 2025 Benchmark Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Students are required to maintain weekly

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – 2025

Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal 

Students are required to maintain weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to combine into one course-long reflective journal that integrates leadership and inquiry into current practice as it applies to the Professional Capstone and Practicum course.

In your journal, you will reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout this course. The journal should address a variable combination of the following, depending on your specific practice immersion clinical experiences:

  1. New practice approaches
  2. Intraprofessional collaboration
  3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
  4. Ethical considerations in health care
  5. Population health concerns
  6. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
  7. Health policy
  8. Leadership and economic models
  9. Health disparities

Students will outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and finally, how the student met the competencies aligned to this course.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

RUBRIC

Attempt Start Date: 10-Feb-2020 at 12:00:00 AM

Due Date: 16-Feb-2020 at 11:59:59 PM

Maximum Points: 100.0

Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Rubric

No of Criteria: 11 Achievement Levels: 5CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory 0-71%0.00 %Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%75.00 %Satisfactory 76-79%79.00 %Good 80-89%89.00 %Excellent 90-100%100.00 %Content100.0     New Practice Approaches10.0New practice approaches are not present.New practice approaches are present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.New practice approaches are present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.New practice approaches are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.New practice approaches are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Intraprofessional Collaboration (4.3)10.0Intraprofessional collaboration information is not present.Intraprofessional collaboration information is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Intraprofessional collaboration information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.Intraprofessional collaboration information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Intraprofessional collaboration information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Health Care Delivery And Clinical Systems (4.1)10.0Health care delivery and clinical systems information is not present.Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Ethical Considerations In Health Care (5.4)10.0Ethical considerations in health care information is not present.Ethical considerations in health care information is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Ethical considerations in health care information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.Ethical considerations in health care information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Ethical considerations in health care information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Population Health Concerns (5.3)10.0Population health concerns information is not present.Population health concerns information is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Population health concerns information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.Population health concerns information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Population health concerns information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.The Role Of Technology In Improving Health Care Outcomes (4.3) 10.0Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is not present.Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Health Policy10.0Health policy information is not present.Health policy information content is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Health policy information content is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.Health policy information content is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Health policy information content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Leadership And Economic Models10.0Information on leadership and economic models is not present.Information on leadership and economic models is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Information on leadership and economic models is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.Information on leadership and economic models is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Information on leadership and economic models is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Health Disparities (1.5)10.0Information on health disparities is not present.Information on health disparities is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.Information on health disparities is present with minor elements missing that do not impede understanding.Information on health disparities is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.Information on health disparities is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.Presentation 5.0The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Total Percentage  100

Weekly topic:

Topic 1: Change Proposal Subject and Purpose Identification 1

  • Topic 2: Change Proposal Subject and Purpose Identification 2
  • Topic 3: Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Development Plan 1
  • Topic 4: Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Development Plan 2
  • Topic 5: Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Development and Implementation Plan 1
  • Topic 6: Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Development and Implementation Plan 2
  • Topic 7: Change Proposal Project Evaluation and Dissemination Plan 1
  • Topic 8: Change Proposal Project Evaluation and Dissemination Plan 2
  • Topic 9: Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project 1
  • Topic 10: Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project 2

NRS-429VN0500 family Centered Health Promotion. – 2025 Understanding family structure and style is essential to patient and family care Conducting

by

Nursing Assignment Help

NRS-429VN0500 family Centered Health Promotion. – 2025

Understanding family structure and style is essential to patient and family care. Conducting a family interview and needs assessment gathers information to identify strengths, as well as potential barriers to health. This information ultimately helps develop family-centered strategies for support and guidance.

This family health assessment is a two-part assignment. The information you gather in this initial assignment will be utilized for the second assignment in Topic 3.

Develop an interview questionnaire to be used in a family-focused functional assessment. The questionnaire must include three open-ended, family-focused questions to assess functional health patterns for each of the following:

  1. Values/Health Perception
  2. Nutrition
  3. Sleep/Rest
  4. Elimination
  5. Activity/Exercise
  6. Cognitive
  7. Sensory-Perception
  8. Self-Perception
  9. Role Relationship
  10. Sexuality
  11. Coping

Select a family, other than your own, and seek permission from the family to conduct an interview. Utilize the interview questions complied in your interview questionnaire to conduct a family-focused functional assessment. Document the responses as you conduct the interview.

Upon completion of the interview, write a 750-1,000-word paper. Analyze your assessment findings. Submit your questionnaire as an appendix with your assignment.

Include the following in your paper:

  1. Describe the family structure. Include individuals and any relevant attributes defining the family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, and environment.
  2. Summarize the overall health behaviors of the family. Describe the current health of the family.
  3. Based on your findings, describe at least two of the functional health pattern strengths noted in the findings. Discuss three areas in which health problems or barriers to health were identified.
  4. Describe how family systems theory can be applied to solicit changes in family members that, in turn, initiate positive changes to the overall family functions over time.

Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.