4062 – 2025 Leadership Clinical Practice Experience Shadow Healthcare Leader This week you will complete your Leadership Clinical

by

Nursing Assignment Help

4062 – 2025

Leadership Clinical Practice Experience: Shadow Healthcare Leader

This week you will complete your Leadership Clinical Practice Experience assignment by submitting the following deliverables:

  • Clinical Hour Assestation: is attached below —-> Leader followed was assistant director of nursing
  • Executive summary
  • Student reflection on the experience

For your Executive Summary:

  • Should be 2 pages, single spaced – like a standard executive summary format.
  • You should NOT use typically scholarly paper format (except reference page)- you NEED to use an EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FORMAT – examples are privided by clicking this link —- https://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/crafting-a-powerful-executive-summary
  • You DO need to use citations as appropriate. Follow APA format for your separate reference page 
  • Address ALL of the prompts for the paper
    • Describe the organizational structure and communication patterns
    • Discuss evidence-based recommendations for improvement based on the concerns identified during the interview.

PLEASE FOLLOW all instructions in the Leadership Clinical Practice Experience Guidelines and Rubric attached.

Instructions – 2025 ext message from Dr Ima Hello my favorite lab assistant Meet me at the lab next week I ll have

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Instructions – 2025

ext message from Dr. Ima: 

Hello my favorite lab assistant! Meet me at the lab next week-I’ll have one of Dr. 
Spenser’s fantastic cupcakes waiting for you!

When you walk into the lab, you find a note from Dr. Ima.

Hello, I’m going to be running late to the lab today, so I am hopeful you can help me out by student teaching the first part of my class. I left you instructions, (located below) and an example for you to reference. I will be back in class before you are done teaching the class.

I have enough of Dr. Spenser’s cupcakes for the entire class, so please pass them out. Looking forward to seeing you.

Instructions on week 7 Lesson Plan:

Create a 5 minute video of you teaching how cellular energy is created from eating Dr. Spenser’s world-famous cupcake.  You must be present in the video.  Screen-o-matic is a free program that you can use (https://screencast-o-matic.com/ (Links to an external site.)) or you can use the camera setting on your computer and record a PowerPoint video.

  • Your explanation should include a detailed process of the reactions and steps of cellular respiration.
  • Your explanation should include a visual demonstration of the steps in cellular respiration.
  • Please submit your video as either a link to YouTube or if you are using PowerPoint, please save the file as a video file (such as MP4 or WMV) and attach the video.

Below is an example of the detail that I would be expecting in the class. Remember, you are teaching students the topic, so what information would you share that would help them understand this process?

Congratulations on a job well done.

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Reference(s)

Bozeman Science. (2012). Cellular Respiration [Video]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/Gh2P5CmCC0M

Rubric

SC186 Unit 7 AssessmentSC186 Unit 7 AssessmentCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentSC186-CO326.0 ptsLevel 5Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.23.0 ptsLevel 4Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.21.0 ptsLevel 3Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.18.0 ptsLevel 2Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.16.0 ptsLevel 1Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions26.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P26.0 ptsLevel 5Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.23.0 ptsLevel 4Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.21.0 ptsLevel 3Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.18.0 ptsLevel 2Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.16.0 ptsLevel 1Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.26.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology17.0 ptsLevel 5Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.15.0 ptsLevel 4Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.14.0 ptsLevel 3Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.12.0 ptsLevel 2Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.10.0 ptsLevel 1Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.17.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting12.0 ptsLevel 5The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.11.0 ptsLevel 4The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling  with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.10.0 ptsLevel 3The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication9.0 ptsLevel 2The assignment exhibits a  limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.7.0 ptsLevel 1The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.12.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I4.0 ptsLevel 5In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.3.5 ptsLevel 4In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.3.0 ptsLevel 3In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.2.5 ptsLevel 2In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.2.0 ptsLevel 1The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements0.0 ptsLevel 0There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.4.0 pts
Total Points: 85.0PreviousNext

The Evidence-Nursing Practice Connection – 2025 This week s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcome CO CO 1 Examine the sources of evidence that

by

Nursing Assignment Help

The Evidence-Nursing Practice Connection – 2025

This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcome (CO). 

  • CO 1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)
  • CO 5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (PO 7 & 8)

Discussion

Improving patient care and outcomes is paramount to the practice of nursing. As we conclude our learning journey through our world of research and evidence-based practice, it is important to reflect upon your time spent in the course:

  • Think about nursing practice and describe one barrier that you feel prohibits nurses from engaging in EBP; share one strategy you could use to facilitate the use of evidence to help improve nursing care for patients.
  • Reflect back over your time in the course and describe how your thinking has changed about nursing research and evidence-based practice; describe one new learning during this course that you believe was the most helpful.

References: Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

This textbook is available as an e-book and can be accessed from the module view.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

52 – 2025 Quantitative Critique Prompt Use the attached article provided Start by filling out the provided Quantitative

by

Nursing Assignment Help

52 – 2025

Quantitative Critique

Prompt: Use the attached article provided. Start by filling out the provided Quantitative review worksheet. Then, using the worksheet as your guide, write a critique to dig deeper into each section and identify the specific examples of each element (e.g., what is the research question? Does the author justify the importance of the research? In the case of a literature review, has the author examined the relevant literature?). Elaborate on each section and evaluate it for its strengths and limitations. Be sure to identify your chosen article and address the following critical elements:  Critique o Purpose and Research Question: What is the research question? Does the author justify the importance of the research? o Design and Methods: What design and methods were used? Are they rigorous and systematic? o Validity and Reliability: Is the study valid and reliable? (For qualitative research, this section of your critique should consider the study’s trustworthiness and rigor.) o Findings and Conclusions: Are the conclusions reasonable given the findings?  Evaluation: What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research article? Do you agree with the author’s conclusions? Why or why not? Did the author succeed or fail in the purpose of the study? Recommend areas for improvement or suggest direction for future research. Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 1–2 page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, oneinch margins, and in APA format.

PLEASE FOLLOW RUBRIC AND GUIDELINES ATTACHED.

nursing clinical reasoning errors – 2025 I need you to find two clinical reasoning errors from my interventions in part B file and go with the

by

Nursing Assignment Help

nursing clinical reasoning errors – 2025

I need you to find two clinical reasoning errors from my interventions in part B file and go with the instructions.

Introduction (300 words)

Provide a very brief overview of your clinical encounter that highlights where the error/challenge/missed opportunity occurred (300 words).

Body (700 words)

Upon reviewing the module content and your previous paper, identify TWO clinical reasoning errors that best aligned to, or potentially could have occurred during your encounter that contributed to why that encounter was challenging or perhaps did not go to plan.

Describe those TWO clinical reasoning errors chosen and discuss how these may have occurred and why. How were the errors eventually remedied? how could they have been mitigated? How could it have impacted on patient outcomes if the error was not identified? In this section you may have to recall elements/assessment data from your clinical encounter to contextualise your discussion.

Conclusion (500 words)

‘Reflect on and process new learning’

From your exploration, consider your future nursing practice. What did you learn? what would you do differently next time? What strategies will you use? How has this enhanced your clinical reasoning skills? This forms a reasonable portion of your paper and therefore you need to demonstrate deep reflection here. Saying ‘I would read more about…..’, etc is not sufficient. We really need to see the encounter as a whole. What have you learnt from this that has better enabled you to ‘think like a registered nurse’.

In addition to the information provided in the unit outline, a rubric is provided to guide your preparation of this assessment task. Word counts for each section are to be considered as a guideline.

Culture in nursing DQ4 – 2025 Read chapter 4 of the class textbook and review the attached PowerPoint

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Culture in nursing DQ4 – 2025

Read chapter 4 of the class textbook and review the attached PowerPoint presentation.  Once done answer the following exercise;

  1.  During a diabetes education, Fatima indicates that she is Muslim and that for Ramadan she fasts from sunrise to sundown.
  2.  Using Leininger’s Sunrise Model, analyzed the dietary significance of fasting.
  3.  Discuss the possible nursing interventions to accommodate Fatima’s religious practice.  Please explain why you use the interventions.
  4. How might Fatima respond if she was told she couldn’t fast and why?

As stated in the class syllabus please present your assignment in an APA format, word document, Arial 12 font attached to the forum in the discussion tab of the blackboard title “week 4 discussion questions”.  The assignment must include at least 2 evidence-based references (excluding the class textbook) no older than 5 years.  References must be quoted in the assignment in order to comply with APA.   

Natural Disaster in Haiti – 2025 Watch the Diary of Medical Mission Trip videos dealing with the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti in 2010

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Natural Disaster in Haiti – 2025

Watch the “Diary of Medical Mission Trip” videos dealing with the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti in 2010. Reflect on this natural disaster by answering the following questions:

  1. Propose one example of a nursing intervention related to the disaster from each of the following levels: primary prevention, secondary prevention, and tertiary prevention. Provide innovative examples that have not been discussed by previous students.
  2. Under which phase of the disaster do the three proposed interventions fall? Explain why you chose that phase.
  3. With what people or agencies would you work in facilitating the proposed interventions and why?

The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence – 2025 Purpose This week s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes COs CO 1 Examine the

by

Nursing Assignment Help

The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence – 2025

Purpose

This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

  • CO 1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)
  • CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO 4 & 8)
  • CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO 4 & 8)

Discussion

You must access the following article to answer the questions:

Baker, N., Taggart, H., Nivens, A. & Tillman, P. (2015). Delirium: Why are nurses confused? MedSurg Nursing, 24(1), 15-22. permalink (Links to an external site.) 

  • Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from one of the study/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.
  • Discuss how the author’s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose/problem. Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.
  • Describe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review/search for evidence. Share your thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.

Professor’s comment:

Hello Class,

Welcome to week 3!  When reviewing evidence of scholarly research studies, you will consistently find the same format:  Background/Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results, and Discussion/Conclusion.  This week, we will spend time discussing a literature review.  To do this, please access and read:

Baker, N., Taggart, H., Nivens, A. & Tillman, P. (2015). Delirium: Why are nurses confused? MedSurg Nursing, 24(1), 15-22

Next, review the literature review and summarize the findings of their evidence search.  How does it relate to the problem they are studying?  Share what interested you about the lit review and how you might go about creating a literature review.  You may keep in mind your clinical question from week 2, if that is helpful.  Why must the literature review be thorough?

This week we will be working toward the following Course Outcomes:

  • Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. 
  • Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. 
  • Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice. 

week 10 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – 2025 Students are required to maintain weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to combine into one course long reflective journal that

by

Nursing Assignment Help

week 10 Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – 2025

Students are required to maintain weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to combine into one course-long reflective journal that integrates leadership and inquiry into current practice as it applies to the Professional Capstone and Practicum course.

In your journal, you will reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout this course. The journal should address a variable combination of the following, depending on your specific practice immersion clinical experiences:

You must place them in one document, but you can break it up in weeks.

  1. New practice approaches
  2. Intraprofessional collaboration
  3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
  4. Ethical considerations in health care
  5. Population health concerns
  6. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
  7. Health policy
  8. Leadership and economic models
  9. Health disparities

Students will outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and finally, how the student met the competencies aligned to this course.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. 

Rubric

  • New practice approaches are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. 10%
  • Intraprofessional collaboration information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. 10%
  • Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. 10%
  • Ethical considerations in health care information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. 10%
  • Population health concerns information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. 10%
  • Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. 10%
  • Health policy information content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. 10%
  • Information on leadership and economic models is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. 10%
  • Information on health disparities is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader 10%
  • The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. 5%
  • Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5%

The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation – 2025 APA format 350 words scholar authors and see references at the bottom Some nurses may be hesitant to get

by

Nursing Assignment Help

The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation – 2025

APA format, 350 words, scholar authors, and see references at the bottom

Some nurses may be hesitant to get involved with policy evaluation. The preference may be to focus on the care and well-being of their patients; some nurses may feel ill-equipped to enter the realm of policy and political activities. However, as you have examined previously, who better to advocate for patients and effective programs and polices than nurses? Already patient advocates in interactions with doctors and leadership, why not with government and regulatory agencies?

In this Discussion, you will reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.

By Day 3 of Week 9

Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities. Be specific and provide examples. 

References

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 7, “Health Policy and Social Program Evaluation” (pp. 116–124 only)
 

Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
 

Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4(5), 983–991. doi:10.1007/s40615-016-0302-4
 

Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 386–393. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2018.05.003
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.