Humanities Test-Out 02 – Visual Art

Competency
Develop a vocabulary for criticizing, evaluating, and describing works of art.

For this assessment task, you are asked to act as an art critic and analyze a series of works. When art critics discuss art, they describe art works in terms of style and medium. Art critics interpret meanings of art and make judgements of a work’s validity to the importance of a piece in the larger context of art history and culture. Art critics also evaluate art in the context of aesthetics.

Please watch the presentation below as a refresher on this deliverable’s content. The presentation will not tell you everything you need to know to pass this test-out, but it should serve as a refresher.

Assessment 2 PPT

 

Competency

Develop a vocabulary for criticizing, evaluating, and describing works of art.

Instructions

For this competency, you will assume the role of a critic. View each piece of work listed below and analyze it as a piece of art, identifying key elements of the work and using terminology common to the discipline. Using a few concise paragraphs for each piece, your analysis should discuss each work as a critic would and include, using the proper vocabulary, what you think the work is about.

Grading Rubric (for each response)

0

1

2

3

4

Category

Not Submitted

No pass

Competence

Proficiency

Mastery

Elements

Not Submitted

Does not identify key elements of the piece of art

Identifies the key elements of that piece of art.

Identifies the key elements of that piece of art and explains them.

Identifies the key elements of that piece of art and explains them, referencing other works of art.

Vocabulary

Not Submitted

Does not use the vocabulary common to that field of art.

Uses the common vocabulary of that field of art.

Uses the common vocabulary of that field of art with explanation.

Uses the common vocabulary of that field of art with a detailed explanation.

Subject/Movement

Not Submitted

Does not offer an explanation as to what the piece is about or the movement the piece represents.

Explains what the piece is about or the movement the piece represents.

Explains what the piece is about or the movement the piece represents in detail.

Explains what the piece is about or the movement the piece represents in detail, referencing other works of art.

Coverage

No pieces discussed.

Pieces discussed, but not enough detail provided.

Pieces discussed, and details provided.

Pieces thoroughly discussed, and insightful details provided.

Pieces thoroughly discussed, and insightful details provided, making reference to additional works.

  

Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment

How healthy is your workplace?

You may think your current organization operates seamlessly, or you may feel it has many issues. You may experience or even observe things that give you pause. Yet, much as you wouldn’t try to determine the health of a patient through mere observation, you should not attempt to gauge the health of your work environment based on observation and opinion. Often, there are issues you perceive as problems that others do not; similarly, issues may run much deeper than leadership recognizes.

There are many factors and measures that may impact organizational health. Among these is civility. While an organization can institute policies designed to promote such things as civility, how can it be sure these are managed effectively? In this Discussion, you will examine the use of tools in measuring workplace civility.

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).

· Review and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.

Post a brief description of the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Based on the results, how civil is your workplace? Explain why your workplace is or is not civil. Then, describe a situation where you have experienced incivility in the workplace. How was this addressed? Be specific and provide examples.

Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment

Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.

In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).

· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.

· Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.

· Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:

o Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)

o Clark (2018)

o Clark (2015)

o Griffin and Clark (2014)

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.

· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.

· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.

· Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

· Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.

· Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.

· Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

· Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

Resources to Use

Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

• Chapter 5, “Collaborative      Leadership Contexts: Networks, Communication, Decision Making, and      Motivation” (pp. 121–144)
• Chapter 9, “Creating and      Shaping the Organizational Environment and Culture to Support Practice      Excellence” (pp. 247–278)
• Chapter 10, “Building Cohesive and Effective      Teams” (pp. 279–298)

Select at least ONE of the following:

Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leader perspectives. Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324–330. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4

Clark, C. M. (2018). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000563

Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf 

Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542. doi:10.3928/00220124-20141122-02

Document: Work Environment Assessment Template (Word document)

          

Work Environment Assessment  

Template

Work Environment Assessment Template

Use this document to complete the Module 4 Workplace Environment Assessment.

  

Summary of Results – Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory 

 

Identify two things that surprised   you about the results. Also identify one idea that you believed prior to   conducting the Assessment that was confirmed. 

 

What do the results of the Assessment   suggest about the health and civility of your workplace?

 

Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the   article(s) you selected. 

Explain how the theory or concept   presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment   Assessment.

 

Explain how your organization   could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve   organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide   examples.

 

General Notes/Comments

The Affordable Care Act was signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 2010. Many of the provisions of the law directly affect health care providers. Review the following topic materials:

1. “About the Affordable Care Act”
2. “Health Care Transformation: The Affordable Care Act and More”

What are the most important elements of the Affordable Care Act in relation to community and public health? What is the role of the nurse in implementing this law?

Patient Introduction

Kenneth Bronson is a 27-year-old male who was just admitted to the Medical Unit from the Emergency Department. He presented to the Emergency Department two hours ago with chest tightness, difficulty breathing, a productive cough for a week, and fever. Chest x-ray revealed right lower lobe pneumonia. IV was started of normal saline at 75 mL per hour. He is receiving oxygen at 2 L/min per nasal cannula. SpO2 on room air was 90%, which increased to 95% with supplemental oxygen. He had a temp of 102.6°F and was given acetaminophen 1,000 mg in the Emergency Department. Pharmacy just delivered the antibiotics to be given.

 

Discuss how the Tuskegee Study started out and the intent of the research (3 points).

o   Cite additional source(s) and include on reference page in APA (1 point)

·         What was unique about the population of Tuskegee, Alabama, as it relates to this study? (2 points)

·         Why do you believe Dr. Douglas chose Dr. Brodus and Miss Evers to participate in this study? (2 points)

8

·         Describe at least three distinct approaches Miss Evers used to convince the men of Tuskegee to participate in the study? (3 points)

·         For each activity by Miss Evers – identify if you feel the activity constituted use of coercion, power (implicit or explicit), advocacy, or a mixture of these and explain why? (6 points)

9

·         In what ways did the United States government use power to influence and propel this study to continue for several decades? (2 points)

·         In what ways did roles (e.g. physician, nurse), race, economics, education, or other factors contribute to this study continuing and to Miss Evers staying with the study? (6 points)

8

·         How do you feel about Miss Evers participation in the Tuskegee Study?  (2 points)

·         What would you have done the same or differently? (3 points)

·         Why? (3 points)

8

·         Locate another research study that violated ethical standards.

o   Describe the study itself (3 points).

o   Which ethical standards did it violate and how? (4 points)

o   Cite additional source(s) and include on reference page in APA (1 point)

8

·         Compare and contrast the ethical violations of the study you describe and the Tuskegee Study. In what specific ways are they similar or different?) (4 points)

4

·         Describe specific research ethics, laws or practices (names, descriptions of protections) that exist now to prevent the issues that arose from the Tuskegee Study and other unethical studies. (4 points)

o   Cite additional source(s) and include on reference page in APA (1 point)

5

·         Written as a paper in APA, not as a bulleted list of answers

·         Paper format (correct APA 7th ed.): font (½ pt), margins/double-spacing (½ pt), page numbers (½ pt), cover page & reference page formats (½ pt)

·         Correct spelling and grammar (4 points)

·         Citations & References (correct APA 7th ed – graded in sections above with these criteria): all references are cited in paper; each reference includes all required elements (author, year, title, journal name, volume, issue if available, page number or electronic locator, URL/doi

·         Turnitin score reflective of original thought (4 points)

10

Total

60