Journal Entry – 2025 PLEASE FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS BELOW 4 REFERENCES ZERO PLAGIARISM TOPIC Tourette Syndrome Learning disorders and motor disorders can

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Journal Entry – 2025

PLEASE FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS BELOW

4 REFERENCES

ZERO PLAGIARISM

TOPIC: Tourette Syndrome

Learning disorders and motor disorders can be difficult for parents to understand. They often have many questions that go unanswered and can create considerable misunderstanding. This misunderstanding can damage the child/parent relationship. The PMHNP can answer questions and provide guidance for the family in order to help reduce the uncertainty of the disorders.

For the Discussion, you will work with your group again to develop a Parent Guide for your assigned disorder.

Learning Objectives

Students will:
  • Analyze signs and symptoms of learning and motor disorders in childhood
  • Analyze pathophysiology of learning and motor disorders in childhood
  • Analyze diagnosis and treatment methods for learning and motor disorders in childhood
  • Evaluate Parent Guides

To Prepare for this Discussion:

  • Your Instructor will assign you to a group and a disorder by Day 1 of Week 2.
  • Review the resources concerning your assigned disorder.
  • Use your group’s Discussion Board to design and develop the Parent Guide before posting to the group wiki. For further guidance, refer to the Accessing Group Discussions instructions below.

Using evidence-based research, design and develop a Parent Guide for your assigned disorder including:

  • Signs and symptoms
  • Pathophysiology
  • How the disorder is diagnosed
  • Treatment options

Project Scholar Practioner – 2025 Project Scholar Practitioner Project Health Care Administration Leadership Theory For your final written Assignment you refine and develop

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Project Scholar Practioner – 2025

 

Project: Scholar-Practitioner Project: Health Care Administration Leadership Theory

For your final written Assignment, you refine and develop your Health Care Administration Leadership Theory based on insights gained in this course about leadership theories and a systems thinking approach. For this Assignment, your theory should reflect Instructor feedback, researched studies, introspection, innovation, and literature analysis.

The Assignment (15–20 pages):

Section 1: Abstract and Introduction (1–2 pages)

Section 2: Revised Literature Review and Problem Statement (5–7 pages):

  • Literature Review to include:
    • A synthesis of the literature of 15–20 peer reviewed, scholarly resources
    • A description of theoretical gaps in the research
  • Problem Statement to include:
    • An explanation of the specific problem that addresses identified gaps within the literature
    • An explanation of how your problem statement incorporates implications for positive social change

Section 3: Personal Health Care Administration Leadership Theory (2–3 pages):

  • An articulation of your personal Health Care Administration Leadership Theory

Section 4: Revised Visual Representation of Your Health Care Administration Leadership Theory (3–4 pages):

Your visual representation should include:

  • Your personal Health Care Administration Leadership Theory to address the gaps identified in the literature
  • A visual representation of the theory (e.g., table, graph, matrix)
  • An explanation on how the theory addresses the literature gaps identified in Week 5
  • A description of how your theory incorporates aspects of systems thinking

Section 5: Empirical Evaluation Plan for a Health Care Administration Leadership Theory (3–4 pages):

You will assess if the newly developed leadership theory addresses the problem you have been working on. What methodological steps will you use? How will you collect data? Suggestion: start with how theories in our text are evaluated. It does not have to be detailed, but it must include the methods, measures, and analytic techniques.

If the Assignments are done correctly, there should be an alignment from the topic of choice to the evaluation:

  • The topic is researched in the literature. The literature review points out a theoretical gap that needs to be addressed by leadership.
  • The gap is turned into a problem statement.
  • A leadership theory to address the problem is proposed.
  • The theory is depicted in a visual.
  • An evaluation plan describes how the newly developed theory resolves the problem identified in the literature.

Section 6: Conclusion (1–2 pages)

Section 7: References:

  • An APA-formatted reference list of 15–20 peer-reviewed, scholarly journals

Discussion 1 And 2 ,250 Words,add References And Citations By 01/11/2020 At 6: 00 Pm,please Add References And Citattions – 2025 Discussion 1 The four principles especially in the context of bioethics in the United States has often

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Discussion 1 And 2 ,250 Words,add References And Citations By 01/11/2020 At 6: 00 Pm,please Add References And Citattions – 2025

Discussion 1

 The four principles, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical narrative? Refer to the topic study materials in your response 

Discussion 2

 What do the four parts of the Christian biblical narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) say about the nature of God and of reality in relation to the reality of sickness and disease? From where would one find comfort and hope in the light of illness according to this narrative? Explain in detail each part of the narrative above and analyze the implications. 

Topic 5 DQ1 – 2025 Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation Consider your internal stakeholders such as the facility unit or health

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Topic 5 DQ1 – 2025

Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation. Consider your internal stakeholders, such as the facility, unit, or health care setting where the change proposal is being considered, and your external stakeholders, like an individual or group outside the health care setting. Why is their support necessary to the success of your change proposal, and how you will go about securing that support?

Facility is Perdue Medical Center, a rehab and long term care center.

Critical Appraisal Of Research – 2025 Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals conducted using appraisal tools to assign market values to houses and

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Critical Appraisal Of Research – 2025

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.

To Prepare:

  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.
  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.
  • Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool      Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.

(Evidence-Based Project)

Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer-reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 2-3 page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

Types of Study Designs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzEyl-VrhKU

Levels of Evidence video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqQ94s-3dCc

Reliability and Validity video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ltvDNAsO-I

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

· Chapter 5, “Critically Appraising Quantitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 124–188)

· Chapter 6, “Critically Appraising Qualitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 189–218)

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010a). Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010b). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II: Digging deeper—examining the “keeper” studies. American Journal of Nursing, 110(9), 41–48. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010c). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III: The process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000390523.99066.b5

Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202–207. doi:10.1177/1078390309338733

Local Practice Problem Exploration ( DIABETES MELLITUS ) – 2025 Local Practice Problem Exploration DIABETES MELLITUS Reflect upon the selected national practice problem in Week 1 to address

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Local Practice Problem Exploration ( DIABETES MELLITUS ) – 2025

 Local Practice Problem Exploration  ( DIABETES MELLITUS )

Reflect upon the selected national practice problem in Week 1 to address the following.

·  From a local perspective, how does the practice problem impact nurses, nursing care, healthcare organizations, and the quality of care being provided?

·  Identify the local key stakeholders related to the selected practice problem.

·  Describe one approach used at your unique setting to address this problem. From your perspective, is this intervention effective in addressing the problem? Why or why not? If this practice problem is not addressed at your workplace, propose an intervention that could be implemented on a local scale to address the problem.

APA FORMATE 

I NEED A COMMENT FOR THIS POST WITH AT LEAST TWO PAGE ( 4-6  PARAGRAPH AND  SOURCES NO LATER THAN FIVE YEARS

Discussion #1 – 2025 In previous weeks we have been reviewing the prevalence mortality and morbidity associated with breast cancer This is a topic

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Discussion #1 – 2025

 In previous weeks we have been reviewing the prevalence, mortality and morbidity associated with breast cancer. This is a topic of extreme public and personal interest. Primary care providers deal with the diagnosis, and the screening of breast cancer on a daily basis. Therefore, in this discussion we will discuss about the importance of understanding the advantages and limitations of its screening .

3 references 

NRS 493 -0503 Professional Capstone – 2025 Students maintained and submitted weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to explore the personal knowledge and skills

by

Nursing Assignment Help

NRS 493 -0503 Professional Capstone – 2025

Students maintained and submitted weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to explore the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout this course. This assignment combines those entries into one course-long reflective journal that integrates leadership and inquiry into current practice as it applies to the Professional Capstone and Practicum course.

This final submission should also outline what students have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced during the process, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and, finally, how the student met the competencies aligned to this course.

The final journal should address a variable combination of the following while incorporating your specific clinical practice experiences:

  1. New practice approaches
  2. Interprofessional collaboration
  3. Health care delivery and clinical systems
  4. Ethical considerations in health care
  5. Practices of culturally sensitive care
  6. Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
  7. Population health concerns
  8. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
  9. Health policy
  10. Leadership and economic models
  11. Health disparities

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN to BSN

2.3:     Understand and value the processes of critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and decision making.

4.1:     Utilize patient care technology and information management systems.

4.3:     Promote interprofessional collaborative communication with health care teams to provide safe and effective care.

5.3:     Provide culturally sensitive care.

5.4:     Preserve the integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients.

Discussion Board – 2025 Please read the following article https www nursingwor ld org practicepolicy nursingexcellence ethics Describe how your future practice as

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Discussion Board – 2025

 

Please read the following article: https://www.nursingwor ld.org/practicepolicy/nursingexcellence/ethics/

Describe how your future practice as an advanced practice nurse can promote access to health care in your area. Initial Post Due on 01/13/21 at 11:59 pm Peer Post DUE on 01/23/21 at 11:59 pm Be specific about the interventions that you will do?

350words, APA style, 2 references not older than 5 years

Group Processes – 2025 Students will Analyze group processes and stages of formation Analyze curative factors of groups Analyze the impact of curative

by

Nursing Assignment Help

Group Processes – 2025

 Students will:

  • Analyze group processes and stages of formation
  • Analyze curative factors of groups
  • Analyze the impact of curative factors on client progress
  • Recommend strategies for managing intragroup conflict
To prepare:
  • Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide on group processes.
  • View the media, Group Therapy: A Live Demonstration, and consider the group dynamics.

 

The Assignment

In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:

  • Explain the group’s processes and stage of formation.
  • Explain curative factors that occurred in the group. Include how these factors might impact client progress.
  • Explain intragroup conflict that occurred and recommend strategies  for managing the conflict. Support your recommendations with  evidence-based literature.

  

Please follow the instruction below for this assignment.

** MUST REVIEW THE ATTACHED LEARNING RESOURCES TO COMPLETE THE ASSIGNMENT

ZERO PLAGIARISM

3 PAGES

FIVE REFERENCES